Search Spectral Audio Signal Processing
Book Index | Global Index
Would you like to be notified by email when Julius Orion Smith III publishes a new entry into his blog?
Conclusions
In the window-method filter design:
- The passband ripple is much smaller than 0.1 dB, which is
``over designed'' and therefore wasting of taps.
- The stopband response ``droops'' which ``wastes'' filter taps
when stopband attenuation is the only stopband specification. In
other words, the first stopband ripple drives the spec (
dB),
while all higher-frequency ripples are over-designed. On the other
hand, a high-frequency ``roll-off'' of this nature is quite natural in
the frequency domain, and it corresponds to a ``smoother pulse'' in
the time domain. Sometimes making the stopband attenuation uniform
will cause small impulses at the beginning and end of the
impulse response in the time domain. (The passband and stopband
ripple can ``add up'' under the inverse Fourier transform integral.)
- The passband is degraded by early roll-off. The passband edge
is not exactly in the desired place.
- The filter length can be thousands of taps long without running
into numerical failure. Filters this long are actually needed for
sampling rate conversion [247,201].
In the optimal Remez-exchange filter:
- The stopband is ideal, equiripple.
- The transition bandwidth is close to half that of the
window method.
- The pass-band is ideal, though over-designed for static audio spectra.
- The expected time-domain ``ears'' due to passband ripple
are quite small.
- The computational design time is orders of magnitude larger
than that for window method.
- The design fails to converge for filters much longer than 256 taps.
(Need to increase working precision to get longer filters.)
Previous:
Comparison to Optimal Chebyshev FIR FilterNext:
Comparison to use of the hilbert function
written by Julius Orion Smith III
Julius Smith's background is in electrical engineering (BS Rice 1975, PhD Stanford 1983). He is presently Professor of Music and Associate Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering at
Stanford's Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), teaching courses and pursuing research related to signal processing applied to music and audio systems. See
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ for details.
No comments yet for this page
Add a Comment
You need to login before you can post a comment (best way to prevent spam). ( Not a member? )