Example Chebyshev Windows and Transforms

Figure 3.25 shows the Dolph-Chebyshev window and its transform as designed by chebwin(31,40) in Matlab, and Fig.3.26 shows the same thing for chebwin(31,200). As can be seen from these examples, higher side-lobe levels are associated with a narrower main lobe and more discontinuous endpoints.

Figure 3.27 shows the Dolph-Chebyshev window and its transform as designed by chebwin(101,40) in Matlab. Note how the endpoints have actually become impulsive for the longer window length. The Hamming window, in contrast, is constrained to be monotonic away from its center in the time domain.

The ``equal ripple'' property in the frequency domain perfectly satisfies worst-case side-lobe specifications. However, it has the potentially unfortunate consequence of introducing ``impulses'' at the window endpoints. Such impulses can be the source of ``pre-echo'' or ``post-echo'' distortion which are time-domain effects not reflected in a simple side-lobe level specification. This is a good lesson in the importance of choosing the right error criterion to minimize. In this case, to avoid impulse endpoints, we might add a continuity or monotonicity constraint in the time domain (see §3.13.2 for examples).

---

Previous: Matlab for the Dolph-Chebyshev Window
Next: Chebyshev and Hamming Windows Compared

Order a Hardcopy of Spectral Audio Signal Processing

---

About the Author: Julius Orion Smith III
Julius Smith's background is in electrical engineering (BS Rice 1975, PhD Stanford 1983). He is presently Professor of Music and Associate Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering at Stanford's Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), teaching courses and pursuing research related to signal processing applied to music and audio systems. See http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ for details.