Bilinear Frequency-Warping for Audio Spectrum Analysis over a Bark Frequency Scale
Simple Approximations to Various Frequency WarpingsSearch Spectral Audio Signal Processing
Would you like to be notified by email when Julius Orion Smith III publishes a new entry into his blog?
In [31], Camacho and Harris propose a number of simple approximations for the most often-used frequency scales. The general formula is
Additionally, the Bark scale was approximated by
More recently, the authors have compared results for an approximation
of the Greenwood scale with
.
In their study of pitch estimation over a warped frequency scale, the
ERB setting of
was found to yield best performance. Moving
either up or down from that value degraded performance. The
authors generally recommend
for use with their SWIPE
pitch estimation algorithm.
Note that the Camacho-Harris frequency-warping approximations for mel, ERB, and Greenwood scales are identical in form to mu-law amplitude compression:
All mappings of the form
, for
, can be viewed as
mappings which are linear for small
and logarithmic
for large
, where ``large'' and ``small'' are defined by the
mapping parameter
.
This linear-log mapping also arises in loudness perception (§6.3.3). For example, the sone amplitude scale is defined in terms of actual loudness perception experiments [259]. At 1kHz and above, loudness perception is approximately logarithmic above 50 dB SPL or so. Below that, it tends toward being more linear. Thus, the use of a dB scale for signal amplitude display can be viewed as a high-amplitude approximation to the sone scale.
