Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search audiodsp



Search tips

Subscribe to audiodsp



audiodsp by Keywords

AAC | ADPCM | Convolution | DAFx | FFT | IIR | Mixer | MP3 | MPEG | MPEG-4

Sponsor

NEW! TMS320C6474: 3x the performance. 1/3 the cost. Three 1 GHz cores on 1 chip.

Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | Audio Signal Processing | Re: Block Floating point FFT or 32 bits precision FFT

Technical discussions related to Audio Signal Processing (digital effects, acoustics, noise reduction, musical signal processing, etc).

  

Post a new Thread

Re: Block Floating point FFT or 32 bits precision FFT - Suciu Radu - Dec 11 11:00:00 2001



Since we are on this topic,

I think that there is a serious dillema, while practically realising an FFT 
core: fixed point vs. floating point.
I have stated some pro's and con's, and I would like to know what you all 
think about it:
floating point, IEEE standard:
pro:
-for the same number of bits, higher dynamic range
-more resistance to overflows (no need to do scaling, block floating point, 
convergent BFP, etc)
con:
-more area than a fixed - point implementation (bigger add-subtractors, 
multipliers)
-more sensible to the nature of the signal

fixed point:
pro:
-smaller area (add/subtractors, mult.)
con:
-more prone to overflow, therefore the need to scale, BFP, CBFP, etc.

Of course, it all may depend on your implementation technique, if it's on a 
DSP, FPGA, or directly in ASIC.

If I'm wrong on any of the above, please let me know.

Radu
	


(You need to be a member of audiodsp -- send a blank email to audiodsp-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )