Sign in

Not a member? | Forgot your Password?


Search audiodsp

Search tips

Subscribe to audiodsp

Search tips

Discussion Groups

FIR Filter Design Software

See Also

Embedded SystemsFPGA

Technical discussions related to Audio Signal Processing (digital effects, acoustics, noise reduction, musical signal processing, etc).

  

Post a new Thread



Is this thread worth a thumbs up?

0

FPGA or DSP - Ariel Hernandez - May 5 8:04:38 2009

Hello there! People of the Audio Digital Processing..
I have a big problem!!! Jejeje. No. I have a problem. I want to work in
ProAudio, and my question is, DSP or FPGA?

My idea is to improve the Audio Quality in several aplicattions. I have to
work with THD, SNR and DA/AD Converters. I don't know if the FPGA works for
these parameters..

Someone can help me?

Vielen Dank!


_____________________________
 Free pdf download: Digital Signal Processor Fundamentals and System Design.




Re: FPGA or DSP - Jaime Andres Aranguren Cardona - May 15 12:25:25 2009

Hello Ariel,

That seems to be a typical application of a DSP; floating point is nowadays=
 the standard for Pro Audio applications. The nicest family would be a SHAR=
C from ADI, although you also have TI's C67x. On the other hand, you can al=
so do it on an FPGA, but in such a case you will not be dealing with the im=
plementation the algorithms in Software, but in Hardware instead.

This is a tradeoff between maximum flexibility (FPGA) and ease of use / max=
imum productivity (DSP). For instance, if you need to connect different dig=
ital audio streams in rather weird manners, it would be worth going the FPG=
A path, provided that you already have much knowledge of how to implement y=
our Signal Processing algorithms in the FPGA fabric. Enven in such a case, =
a smaller FPGA or even a CPLD plus a decent DSP would do the job in a more =
efficient and easier manner.

BTW, from your name I infer that you could be a spanish speaking guy, but f=
rom your "Thank you" it seems like you are located in Germany, kind of
my s=
ituation nowadays. If you want, send me a private email and we can further =
discuss.

Regards.

=20
Jaime Andr=E9s Aranguren Cardona
j...@ieee.org
j...@computer.org

________________________________
From: Ariel Hernandez <a...@gmail.com>
To: Grupo de DSP Audio Digital <A...@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2009 9:18:29 PM
Subject: [audiodsp] FPGA or DSP

Hello there! People of the Audio Digital Processing..

I have a big problem!!! Jejeje. No. I have a problem. I want to work in Pro=
Audio, and my question is, DSP or FPGA?

My idea is to improve the Audio Quality in several aplicattions. I have to =
work with THD, SNR and DA/AD Converters. I don't know if the FPGA works for=
 these parameters..

Someone can help me?

Vielen Dank!=20
=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20

_____________________________________


_____________________________
 Free pdf download: Complex Digital Signal Processing in Telecommunications.




Re: FPGA or DSP - palm...@hotmail.com - May 18 9:41:28 2009

Hi, 
I agree. DSP is a good choice.
However, a FPGA's manufacturer doesn't think the same way:
http://www.altera.com/literature/wp/wp-01023.pdf

I'm spanish speaker too. If you both want, contact me.

Regards,
Pablo
---------------------------------------------------------------
>That seems to be a typical application of a DSP; floating point is
nowadays=
 the standard for Pro Audio applications. The nicest family would be a SHAR=
C from ADI, although you also have TI's C67x. On the other hand, you can al=
so do it on an FPGA, but in such a case you will not be dealing with the im=
plementation the algorithms in Software, but in Hardware instead.

This is a tradeoff between maximum flexibility (FPGA) and ease of use / max=
imum productivity (DSP). For instance, if you need to connect different dig=
ital audio streams in rather weird manners, it would be worth going the FPG=
A path, provided that you already have much knowledge of how to implement y=
our Signal Processing algorithms in the FPGA fabric. Enven in such a case, =
a smaller FPGA or even a CPLD plus a decent DSP would do the job in a more =
efficient and easier manner.

BTW, from your name I infer that you could be a spanish speaking guy, but f=
rom your "Thank you" it seems like you are located in Germany, kind
of
my s=
ituation nowadays. If you want, send me a private email and we can further =
discuss.

Regards.

Hello there! People of the Audio Digital Processing..
>I have a big problem!!! Jejeje. No. I have a problem. I want to work in
>ProAudio, and my question is, DSP or FPGA?
>
>My idea is to improve the Audio Quality in several aplicattions. I have to
>work with THD, SNR and DA/AD Converters. I don't know if the FPGA works for
>these parameters..
>
>Someone can help me?
>
>Vielen Dank!


_____________________________
 Free pdf download: Digital Signal Processor Fundamentals and System Design.




Re: Re: FPGA or DSP - Al Clark - May 18 9:47:07 2009

I think in most cases, a DSP will be the best choice. We make a SHARC 
21369 & Cyclone III FPGA module that lets you do both. Checkout our 
website if interested.

Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
www.danvillesignal.com

p...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I agree. DSP is a good choice.
> However, a FPGA's manufacturer doesn't think the same way:
> http://www.altera.com/literature/wp/wp-01023.pdf 
> <http://www.altera.com/literature/wp/wp-01023.pdf> I'm spanish
speaker too. If you both want, contact me.
>
> Regards,
> Pablo
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >That seems to be a typical application of a DSP; floating point is 
> nowadays=
> the standard for Pro Audio applications. The nicest family would be a 
> SHAR=
> C from ADI, although you also have TI's C67x. On the other hand, you 
> can al=
> so do it on an FPGA, but in such a case you will not be dealing with 
> the im=
> plementation the algorithms in Software, but in Hardware instead.
>
> This is a tradeoff between maximum flexibility (FPGA) and ease of use 
> / max=
> imum productivity (DSP). For instance, if you need to connect 
> different dig=
> ital audio streams in rather weird manners, it would be worth going 
> the FPG=
> A path, provided that you already have much knowledge of how to 
> implement y=
> our Signal Processing algorithms in the FPGA fabric. Enven in such a 
> case, =
> a smaller FPGA or even a CPLD plus a decent DSP would do the job in a 
> more =
> efficient and easier manner.
>
> BTW, from your name I infer that you could be a spanish speaking guy, 
> but f=
> rom your "Thank you" it seems like you are located in Germany,
kind of
> my s=
> ituation nowadays. If you want, send me a private email and we can 
> further =
> discuss.
>
> Regards.
>
> Hello there! People of the Audio Digital Processing..
> >I have a big problem!!! Jejeje. No. I have a problem. I want to work
in
> >ProAudio, and my question is, DSP or FPGA?
> >
> >My idea is to improve the Audio Quality in several aplicattions. I 
> have to
> >work with THD, SNR and DA/AD Converters. I don't know if the FPGA 
> works for
> >these parameters..
> >
> >Someone can help me?
> >
> >Vielen Dank!
> >
> > 

_____________________________
 Free pdf download: Digital Signal Processor Fundamentals and System Design.