Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search audiodsp



Search tips

Subscribe to audiodsp



audiodsp by Keywords

AAC | ADPCM | Convolution | DAFx | FFT | IIR | Mixer | MP3 | MPEG | MPEG-4

Ads

Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | Audio Signal Processing | 1-Bit Goertzel Algorithm Performance

Technical discussions related to Audio Signal Processing (digital effects, acoustics, noise reduction, musical signal processing, etc).

  

Post a new Thread

1-Bit Goertzel Algorithm Performance - dn...@newelltech.com - May 14 8:35:26 2007



I'm implementing a DTMF detector using the Goertzel Algorithm.
I have raw simulations built using Excel (I know...) and am getting some interesting results.

I don't see a lot of differences in the frequency response using 10, 8 or 1 bit ADC's and
floating point arithmetic. I would have expected to see significantly poorer performance with
the 1-bit.

I also ran some simulations using float and 16-bit arithmetic (with an 8x8 multiply) and don't
see a lot of differences there.

In many discussions I've read, everyone seems focused on squeezing out the maximum number of
bits (float or fixed). I can understand this with a high order IIR, but is my little 2nd order
IIR going to be that sensitive? I don't seem to see it in my simulations.

I'm hoping someone has implemented a 1-bit and has some performance data he's willing to share
or some insight into these effects.

Thanks.



(You need to be a member of audiodsp -- send a blank email to audiodsp-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: 1-Bit Goertzel Algorithm Performance - Jeff Brower - May 15 9:23:44 2007

Dennis-

> I'm implementing a DTMF detector using the Goertzel Algorithm.
> I have raw simulations built using Excel (I know...) and am getting some
> interesting results.
> 
> I don't see a lot of differences in the frequency response using 10, 8 or
> 1 bit ADC's and floating point arithmetic. I would have expected to see
> significantly poorer performance with the 1-bit.
> 
> I also ran some simulations using float and 16-bit arithmetic (with an
> 8x8 multiply) and don't see a lot of differences there.
> 
> In many discussions I've read, everyone seems focused on squeezing out the
> maximum number of bits (float or fixed). I can understand this with a high
> order IIR, but is my little 2nd order IIR going to be that sensitive? I
> don't seem to see it in my simulations.
> 
> I'm hoping someone has implemented a 1-bit and has some performance data
> he's willing to share or some insight into these effects.

A 1-bit ADC means you've built sort of a zero-crossing detector, not really an ADC. 
Your IIR filter shouldn't have any issues with that if it's using 16-bit precision
(coefficients and delay storage elements).  A general rule of thumb is that for "high
Q" IIR filters (narrow pass/stop band, sharp cut-offs, significant attenuation),
maintaining filter precision as twice data precision will avoid the notorious IIR
stability issues (applies to 2nd order or higher).

-Jeff



(You need to be a member of audiodsp -- send a blank email to audiodsp-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )