Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search c55x



Search tips

Subscribe to c55x



c55x by Keywords

AIC23 | C5509 | CCS | CSL | EMIF | EVM | GEL | GPIO | HPI | Interfacing | JTAG | McBSP | OMAP | Omap15 | OMAP59 | RTDX | SDRAM | TMS320VC5509 | USB | XDS5


Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | TMS320C55x | 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact

Technical discussions about the TI C55x DSPs (including the c5501, c5502, c5503, c5507, c5509, c5510 and OMAP5910).

  

Post a new Thread

5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - mgor...@yahoo.com - Oct 30 8:45:39 2007



Does anyone know if it's possible to use Xilinx's Impact and usb platform cable to do a
boundary scan on the 5509a? Specifically the spectrum digital TMS320VC5509a DSK board.



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - Jeff Brower - Oct 30 11:33:15 2007

M Gora-

> Does anyone know if it's possible to use Xilinx's Impact and usb platform
> cable to do a boundary scan on the 5509a? Specifically the spectrum
> digital TMS320VC5509a DSK board.

It may not work because the iMPACT setup doesn't handle EMU0 and EMU1 connections.

But what's the point of a boundary scan on a DSK board?  The DSK board is a "known
good" -- it works.  JTAG is used with this board in conjunction with Code Composer
Studio (CCS) software, in order to debug run-time DSP code.  Certainly the Xilinx
tools can't be used with CCS for this purpose.

-Jeff



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - mgor...@yahoo.com - Oct 30 15:07:15 2007

Well long story short I need to test the effects of a JTAG boundary scan on certain system
software that has been developed. I was hoping to have a more controlled boundary scan than
using code composer studio as I don't know exactly what it's doing when it connects to the
board.



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - Jeff Brower - Oct 30 15:20:03 2007

M Gora-

> Well long story short I need to test the effects of a JTAG boundary scan on certain system
software that has been developed. I was hoping to have a more controlled boundary scan than
using code composer studio as I don't know exactly what it's doing when it connects to the
board.

You're going to run boundary scan with DSP software running, correct?  Hope not --
that's a sure recipe for disaster.  You must mean host software or other external
software connect to I/O (USB, McBSP etc).  Please clarify.

-Jeff



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - mgor...@yahoo.com - Oct 31 9:06:04 2007

The software that will be running is very simple, this is rather an attempt to look at the
behavior of the DSP during a boundary scan. Specifically I am curious as to the activity of the
watchdog timer and it's ability to reset the DSP or fire an interrupt during a boundary scan.

-Mike



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: Re: 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - Jeff Brower - Oct 31 10:47:57 2007

M Gora-

> The software that will be running is very simple, this is rather an
> attempt to look at the behavior of the DSP during a boundary scan.
> Specifically I am curious as to the activity of the watchdog timer
> and it's ability to reset the DSP or fire an interrupt during a
> boundary scan.

My understanding is that in boundary scan mode (indicated to the DSP by state of EMU0
+ EMU1 lines on the JTAG interface) no circuitry on the DSP will be running.

This could be wrong, or newer TI DSPs may act differently -- if that's the case
hopefully someone like Mike Dunn who knows more about JTAG interface than I do would
provide correct information.

-Jeff



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: 5509a JTAG and Xilinx Impact - mgor...@yahoo.com - Nov 1 9:26:45 2007

Yes that is my understanding as well when boundary scan is done but I have not been able
to find the stated behavior anywhere in the processor specifications or elsewhere. I am just
trying to verify if this is true or not and if not test it's possibilities.



(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )