Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search c55x



Search tips

Subscribe to c55x



c55x by Keywords

AIC23 | C5509 | CCS | CSL | EMIF | EVM | GEL | GPIO | HPI | Interfacing | JTAG | McBSP | OMAP | Omap15 | OMAP59 | RTDX | SDRAM | TMS320VC5509 | USB | XDS5

Sponsor

NEW! TMS320C6474: 3x the performance. 1/3 the cost. Three 1 GHz cores on 1 chip.

Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | TMS320C55x | Possible Bug in CCS-2.1 assembler???

Technical discussions about the TI C55x DSPs (including the c5501, c5502, c5503, c5507, c5509, c5510 and OMAP5910).

  

Post a new Thread

Re: Possible Bug in CCS-2.1 assembler??? - Suyog Deshpande - Jun 21 17:36:00 2002



Hello Gaurav:

I have faced similar problems before....with both the versions (CCS 2.0/2.1)
of TI tools :-(

Suyog. ----Original Message Follows----
From: "Gaurav" <>
To: <>
Subject: [c55x] Possible Bug in CCS-2.1 assembler???
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 20:42:14 +0530

Hi,
I am using CCS ver 2.1 and faced some problem on using algebraic
version
of assembly instruction for BTST.

Mnemonic instruction "BTST AR6,AC0,TC1" compiles successfully.

Algebraic equivalent of the above instruction "TC1 = bit (AC0,AR6)" gives
compilation error (parse ERROR).
"test.asm", ERROR! at line 9: [E0000] parse error
TC1 = bit(AC0,AR6)
^

However, the instruction "TC1 = bit (AC0,@#12)" works.
Infact no Bit operation on registers is working in Algerbric form.
I tried the similar thing in CCS ver 2.0 also and the result was same.
Has anyone faced a similar problem??

Thanks in advance

With Regards,
Gaurav
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx





(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )