Sign in
Search c55x
Subscribe to c55x
c55x by Keywords
AIC23 | C5509 | CCS | CSL | EMIF | EVM | GEL | GPIO | HPI | Interfacing | JTAG | McBSP | OMAP | Omap15 | OMAP59 | RTDX | SDRAM | TMS320VC5509 | USB | XDS5
Discussion Groups
Discussion Groups | TMS320C55x | Re: ACE USB 2.0
Technical discussions about the TI C55x DSPs (including the c5501, c5502, c5503, c5507, c5509, c5510 and OMAP5910).
ACE USB 2.0 - rumian - Jan 21 15:00:00 2004
|
Hi, what is your opinion about this emulator from Softronics ? regards Roman Rumian |
|
|
(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: ACE USB 2.0 - gagan singh - Jan 22 4:48:00 2004
|
Hi , Generally You will find USB interface emulator cheap in price. But for a professional project, I find they not that suitable. As one have to keep on reconfiguring the driver interface with the Windows machine & host of other problems. That loose professional people time in big project. Comparatively PCI interface emulators are more stable. But are expansive. However on the other hand for educational purpose project, or for mobile expert they (USB interface) are fine. Please note (USB interface ) emulators provide same feature as are in the PCI interface emulators. Hope this helps. For this particular emulator I do not have experience so can't comment but should be okay if in TI 's third party list. Bye Gagan --- rumian <> wrote: > Hi, > > what is your opinion about this emulator from > Softronics ? > > regards > > Roman Rumian __________________________________ |
|
|
(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: ACE USB 2.0 - Indrek Rebane - Jan 22 9:37:00 2004
|
Hi Gagan, gagan singh wrote: > Generally You will find USB interface emulator cheap in price. > But for a professional project, I find they not that suitable. > As one have to keep on reconfiguring the driver interface with > the Windows machine & host of other problems. Not true. We have been using Blackhawk USB emulator for almost a year now and have seen not reason to reconfigure driver yet. Speed of our USB emulator is slower then for example FlexDS PCI card we also have, but that might have been changed with newer USB emulators. Indrek -- Indrek Rebane | Borthwick-Pignon Electronics Engineer | Tartu Science Park Phone: (+372) 7 302 641 | Riia 185, 51014 Tartu Fax: (+372) 7 383 041 | Estonia | www.bps.co.ee |
|
|
(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: ACE USB 2.0 - Roman Rumian - Jan 22 13:31:00 2004
|
Thank you all for remarks ! Indrek Rebane wrote: > Hi Gagan, > > gagan singh wrote: > >> Generally You will find USB interface emulator cheap in price. >> But for a professional project, I find they not that suitable. >> As one have to keep on reconfiguring the driver interface with >> the Windows machine & host of other problems. > Not true. We have been using Blackhawk USB emulator for almost a > year now and have seen not reason to reconfigure driver yet. Speed > of our USB emulator is slower then for example FlexDS PCI card we > also have, but that might have been changed with newer USB emulators. > > Indrek ACE one has USB version 2.0 interface, so the speed should be good - see: http://www.softronx.com/Products/emulator_comparison.asp Regards Roman |
|
|
(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: ACE USB 2.0 - gagan singh - Jan 22 19:41:00 2004
|
Well, I hope I am wrong. We use Blackhawk USB, Flexds USB, Flexds PCI & last but not lest TI PCI. All four types with even larger numbers in our single project. USB interface is hot swap stuff. U manage time sharing of emulators on diffrent cards with diffrent developers in short timelines. U will know what is wrong what is right. --Gagan --- Indrek Rebane <> wrote: > Hi Gagan, > > gagan singh wrote: > > Generally You will find USB interface emulator > cheap in price. > > But for a professional project, I find they not > that suitable. > > As one have to keep on reconfiguring the driver > interface with > > the Windows machine & host of other problems. > > Not true. We have been using Blackhawk USB emulator > for almost a > year now and have seen not reason to reconfigure > driver yet. Speed > of our USB emulator is slower then for example > FlexDS PCI card we > also have, but that might have been changed with > newer USB emulators. > > Indrek > > -- > Indrek Rebane | Borthwick-Pignon > Electronics Engineer | Tartu Science Park > Phone: (+372) 7 302 641 | Riia 185, 51014 Tartu > Fax: (+372) 7 383 041 | Estonia > | www.bps.co.ee __________________________________ |
(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )
Re: ACE USB 2.0 - Indrek Rebane - Jan 22 21:08:00 2004
|
Hi, Roman Rumian wrote: > ACE one has USB version 2.0 interface, so the speed should be > good - see: > http://www.softronx.com/Products/emulator_comparison.asp Speed of emulator and of its interface are quite different things. Due low bandwidth of XDS510 protocol, USB 2.0 high-speed interface (equal to USB 1.0 high-speed, 12Mbps) is not limiting factor by any means. I can tell for sure that PCI flexds is faster then USB2.0 BlackHawk. Have not tested ACE (yet). With blackhawk I really love remote debugging capability (emulator sharing over tcp/ip) Indrek -- Indrek Rebane | Borthwick-Pignon Electronics Engineer | Tartu Science Park Phone: (+372) 7 302 641 | Riia 185, 51014 Tartu Fax: (+372) 7 383 041 | Estonia | www.bps.co.ee |
(You need to be a member of c55x -- send a blank email to c55x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )