Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search c6x



Search tips

Subscribe to c6x



c6x by Keywords

AD535 | BIOS | Booting | Bootloader | C621 | C6211 | C6415 | C671 | C6711 | C6711DSK | C6713 | CCS | Chassaing | COFF | DAT | DM64 | DM642 | DMA | DSK671 | DSK6711 | EDM | EDMA | EMIF | Emulator | EVM | EVM620 | FFT | FIR | GPIO | Halting | HPI | HWI | IDK | JTAG | LDB | LDH | LDW | Linker | LMS | LOG_printf | Matlab | McBSP | MEM_alloc | MIPS | PCI | PCM3003 | Pipeline | Profiling | QDM | Reset | ROM | RTDX | Sampling | SDRAM | Stack | TEB | THS1206 | TMS320C621 | TMS320C6416 | TMS320C6711 | TMS320C6713 | UART | Vector Table | XBUS | XDS560


Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | TMS320C6x | CCS Performance

Technical discussions about the TI C6000 DSPs (including the c62x, c64x and c67x DSPs).

  

Post a new Thread

CCS Performance - Bernhard 'Gustl' Bauer - Oct 22 10:36:00 2004




Hi,

at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB RAM.
I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it needs about
10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I wonder if it is
because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks DSK over USB for
permission to continue compiling. In other words is a full CCS 2.2
faster than a CCS 2.2 that comes with DSK?

I've read the minimum requirements for CCS 3.0 are:
PII/600MHz
128 MB RAM

What would those of you who use CCS 3.0 recommend?

Gustl






(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Jeff Brower - Oct 22 20:00:00 2004

Gustl-

> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB RAM.
> I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it needs about
> 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I wonder if it is
> because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks DSK over USB for
> permission to continue compiling.

Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't compile? For
real?

-Jeff






(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Mike Dunn - Oct 22 20:03:00 2004

Hello Gustl,

This is only an opinion, but I have always gotten
marginal performance when I used a machine that barely
met a vendor's minimum requirements. Also, compiler
optimization, how you count source lines, etc. can
make a difference.

As a point of reference, I just recompiled a project
that I am working on...

CCS 2.1, 20 source files, -o0 -ml3 options, a little
over 200k of compiled code, Win 2k, 384 Mb ram, 730
Mhz - it took about 90 seconds.

It doesn't mean much, but it may give you a vague
idea.

mikedunn
--- Bernhard 'Gustl' Bauer <> wrote: >
> Hi,
>
> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a
> PIII/600MHz 128MB RAM.
> I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To
> compile it needs about
> 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
> wonder if it is
> because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks DSK
> over USB for
> permission to continue compiling. In other words is
> a full CCS 2.2
> faster than a CCS 2.2 that comes with DSK?
>
> I've read the minimum requirements for CCS 3.0 are:
> PII/600MHz
> 128 MB RAM
>
> What would those of you who use CCS 3.0 recommend?
>
> Gustl > _____________________________________ > Yahoo! Groups Links




(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Bernhard Gustl Bauer - Oct 24 8:41:00 2004


Hi Jeff,

I sometimes get an error that CCS couldn't connect to the DSK board. In
this case I can't compile anymore. The only thing that helps is a reboot.

Gustl Jeff Brower wrote:
> Gustl- >> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB
>> RAM. I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it
>> needs about 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
>> wonder if it is because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks
>> DSK over USB for permission to continue compiling. > Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't
> compile? For real?
>
> -Jeff





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Shucheng Wang - Oct 24 14:50:00 2004


Gustle:
If you have problems to connect to DSK, CCS should inform you
"Abort","Retry" or "Ignore". If you choose Ignore, you can enter CCS ,
edit and compile your project. It is not important to succesfully
connect to DSK. The compiler is independent of DSK.
I think the time you mentioned is mostly depend on the code,
build options, and your computer. On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:41:32 +0200, Bernhard Gustl Bauer
<> wrote: > Hi Jeff,
>
> I sometimes get an error that CCS couldn't connect to the DSK board. In
> this case I can't compile anymore. The only thing that helps is a reboot.
>
> Gustl >
>
> Jeff Brower wrote:
> > Gustl-
> >
> >
> >> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB
> >> RAM. I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it
> >> needs about 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
> >> wonder if it is because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks
> >> DSK over USB for permission to continue compiling.
> >
> >
> > Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't
> > compile? For real?
> >
> > -Jeff
>
> _____________________________________ > Yahoo! Groups Links

--
Shucheng Wang
State Key Lab of Fluid Power
ZheJiang University,HangZhou
PR.China






(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Tarang Dadia - Oct 24 16:32:00 2004


Gustl,

I have had similar problem earlier. If you just want to *just compile*
your code then u can disconnect the DSK and then open CCS. An error
dialog will pop up saying no dsk is connected .. ABORT ... RETRY ..
IGNORE. .. you can hit ignore and continue with ur normal tasks such
as compile and build.. but you wont b able to load ur code.
I am not sure tho whether u want to just compile or what.

Hope this helps,
Tarang On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:41:32 +0200, Bernhard Gustl Bauer
<> wrote: > Hi Jeff,
>
> I sometimes get an error that CCS couldn't connect to the DSK board. In
> this case I can't compile anymore. The only thing that helps is a reboot.
>
> Gustl >
>
> Jeff Brower wrote:
> > Gustl-
> >
> >
> >> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB
> >> RAM. I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it
> >> needs about 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
> >> wonder if it is because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks
> >> DSK over USB for permission to continue compiling.
> >
> >
> > Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't
> > compile? For real?
> >
> > -Jeff
>
> _____________________________________ > Yahoo! Groups Links




(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Jeff Brower - Oct 24 22:14:00 2004

Shucheng-

> If you have problems to connect to DSK, CCS should inform you
> "Abort","Retry" or "Ignore". If you choose Ignore, you can enter CCS ,
> edit and compile your project. It is not important to succesfully
> connect to DSK. The compiler is independent of DSK.
> I think the time you mentioned is mostly depend on the code,
> build options, and your computer.

Some other group members have let me know offline that for DSK C6713, CCS 3.x
does
check for the DSK board during compile. It is a new "feature".

For lower CCS versions, or DSK C6711, choosing 'Ignore' is still Ok.

-Jeff

> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:41:32 +0200, Bernhard Gustl Bauer
> <> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > I sometimes get an error that CCS couldn't connect to the DSK board. In
> > this case I can't compile anymore. The only thing that helps is a reboot.
> >
> > Gustl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeff Brower wrote:
> > > Gustl-
> > >
> > >
> > >> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB
> > >> RAM. I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it
> > >> needs about 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
> > >> wonder if it is because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks
> > >> DSK over USB for permission to continue compiling.
> > >
> > >
> > > Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't
> > > compile? For real?
> > >
> > > -Jeff
> >
> > _____________________________________
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Shucheng Wang
> State Key Lab of Fluid Power
> ZheJiang University,HangZhou
> PR.China
>
> _____________________________________ > Yahoo! Groups Links





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Bernhard 'Gustl' Bauer - Oct 25 5:19:00 2004


Shucheng,

this is true. I seem to always hit the wrong button :-(

I always thought the DSK board is a kind of dongle for CCS.

But this also shows that my computer is way to slow.

Gustl

Shucheng Wang wrote:
> Gustle:
> If you have problems to connect to DSK, CCS should inform you
> "Abort","Retry" or "Ignore". If you choose Ignore, you can enter CCS ,
> edit and compile your project. It is not important to succesfully
> connect to DSK. The compiler is independent of DSK.
> I think the time you mentioned is mostly depend on the code,
> build options, and your computer.





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Shucheng Wang - Oct 25 8:35:00 2004


Jeff:
I am not familiar with CCS3.x. Do you mean it's a feature of CCS
3.x? or CCS3.x with DSK6713?
thanks!

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:14:51 -0500, Jeff Brower <> wrote:
> Shucheng-
>
> > If you have problems to connect to DSK, CCS should inform you
> > "Abort","Retry" or "Ignore". If you choose Ignore, you can enter CCS ,
> > edit and compile your project. It is not important to succesfully
> > connect to DSK. The compiler is independent of DSK.
> > I think the time you mentioned is mostly depend on the code,
> > build options, and your computer.
>
> Some other group members have let me know offline that for DSK C6713, CCS 3.x
does
> check for the DSK board during compile. It is a new "feature".
>
> For lower CCS versions, or DSK C6711, choosing 'Ignore' is still Ok.
>
> -Jeff
>
> > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:41:32 +0200, Bernhard Gustl Bauer
> > <> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > >
> > > I sometimes get an error that CCS couldn't connect to the DSK board. In
> > > this case I can't compile anymore. The only thing that helps is a reboot.
> > >
> > > Gustl
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeff Brower wrote:
> > > > Gustl-
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB
> > > >> RAM. I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it
> > > >> needs about 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
> > > >> wonder if it is because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks
> > > >> DSK over USB for permission to continue compiling.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't
> > > > compile? For real?
> > > >
> > > > -Jeff
> > >
> > > _____________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Shucheng Wang
> > State Key Lab of Fluid Power
> > ZheJiang University锛孒angZhou
> > PR.China > >
> > _____________________________________
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Shucheng Wang
State Key Lab of Fluid Power
ZheJiang University, HangZhou
PR.China





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - Jeff Brower - Oct 25 12:41:00 2004

Shucheng-

> I am not familiar with CCS3.x. Do you mean it's a feature of CCS
> 3.x? or CCS3.x with DSK6713?

When used together.

-Jeff

> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:14:51 -0500, Jeff Brower <>
wrote:
> > Shucheng-
> >
> > > If you have problems to connect to DSK, CCS should inform you
> > > "Abort","Retry" or "Ignore". If you choose Ignore, you can enter CCS ,
> > > edit and compile your project. It is not important to succesfully
> > > connect to DSK. The compiler is independent of DSK.
> > > I think the time you mentioned is mostly depend on the code,
> > > build options, and your computer.
> >
> > Some other group members have let me know offline that for DSK C6713, CCS
3.x does
> > check for the DSK board during compile. It is a new "feature".
> >
> > For lower CCS versions, or DSK C6711, choosing 'Ignore' is still Ok.
> >
> > -Jeff
> >
> > > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:41:32 +0200, Bernhard Gustl Bauer
> > > <> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jeff,
> > > >
> > > > I sometimes get an error that CCS couldn't connect to the DSK board. In
> > > > this case I can't compile anymore. The only thing that helps is a
reboot.
> > > >
> > > > Gustl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Brower wrote:
> > > > > Gustl-
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> at the moment I'm using DSK6713 with CCS 2.2 on a PIII/600MHz 128MB
> > > > >> RAM. I have a C source file with about 2000 lines. To compile it
> > > > >> needs about 10 Minutes. Which in my opinion is pretty long. I
> > > > >> wonder if it is because of a slow processor, or because CCS asks
> > > > >> DSK over USB for permission to continue compiling.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you saying that if you disconnect the DSK board, it won't
> > > > > compile? For real?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jeff





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )

Re: CCS Performance - eewizard_1 - Oct 26 1:03:00 2004

Hi Shucheng Wang

I wonder if we're not having 2 versions of CCS talked about. I have
the CCS 2.2 that comes from Spectrum Digital with the C6713 DSK and
the "Ignore" button is not an option when it starts up. Also, when
it's running the thing will halt if you unplug the USB cable and not
give you the "Ignore" option. No chance to edit anything. The Full
3.0 will run without the board as I expect the full V2.2 will.

-Al

--- In , "Bernhard 'Gustl' Bauer" <gustl@q...> wrote:
>
> Shucheng,
>
> this is true. I seem to always hit the wrong button :-(
>
> I always thought the DSK board is a kind of dongle for CCS.
>
> But this also shows that my computer is way to slow.
>
> Gustl
>
> Shucheng Wang wrote:
> > Gustle:
> > If you have problems to connect to DSK, CCS should inform you
> > "Abort","Retry" or "Ignore". If you choose Ignore, you can enter CCS ,
> > edit and compile your project. It is not important to succesfully
> > connect to DSK. The compiler is independent of DSK.
> > I think the time you mentioned is mostly depend on the code,
> > build options, and your computer.
>





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )