AD535 | BIOS | Booting | Bootloader | C621 | C6211 | C6415 | C671 | C6711 | C6711DSK | C6713 | CCS | Chassaing | COFF | DAT | DM64 | DM642 | DMA | DSK671 | DSK6711 | EDM | EDMA | EMIF | Emulator | EVM | EVM620 | FFT | FIR | GPIO | Halting | HPI | HWI | IDK | JTAG | LDB | LDH | LDW | Linker | LMS | LOG_printf | Matlab | McBSP | MEM_alloc | MIPS | PCI | PCM3003 | Pipeline | Profiling | QDM | Reset | ROM | RTDX | Sampling | SDRAM | Stack | TEB | THS1206 | TMS320C621 | TMS320C6416 | TMS320C6711 | TMS320C6713 | UART | Vector Table | XBUS | XDS560

Hi,
I am using 6711 DSK in my work, and I used both CCS and MatLab to display signals in real-time. I know that the CCS faster than MatLab in processing but I would like to know what is the different in time processing to get final result MatLab or CCS? Where MatLab is used just to display signal and use ready functions like FFT algorithm or time frequency representation to make the analysis of capture signal in real-time.
Is there big different?





(You need to be a member of c6x -- send a blank email to c6x-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )