Sign in

username:

password:



Not a member?

Search speechcoding



Search tips

Subscribe to speechcoding



speechcoding by Keywords

ACELP | ADPCM | AMBE | AMR | AMR-NB | CELP | Codebook | DTMF | G.723 | G.726 | G.729 | GSM | Interpolation | LPC | LSF | LSP | MELP | PCM | Perceptual | Pitch | PSOL | QCELP | Quantization | SMV | VAD | Vocoder

Ads

Discussion Groups

Discussion Groups | Speech Coding | MELP: peakiness thresholds

Technical discussions related to Speech Coding (all itu and other vocoders, ACELP, CELP, AMR, etc)

  

Post a new Thread

MELP: peakiness thresholds - Ilya Druker - Jul 21 12:08:00 2005



Ladies & Gentlemen

The additional criterion for voicing measure in MELP is peakiness. For
r=1.4 the voicing in the first band is set 1 (strong voicing), for
r=1.6 the voicing at second and third bands also set to 1.

According to the classical paper
"Selective Modeling of the LPC residual during unvoiced frames: White
noise or pulse excitation" by D. Thomson & D. Prezas
for gaussian noise r=sqrt(pi/2)=1.2533. You can easily check that for
noise +1,-1,+1,-1,... r=sqrt(2)=1.41....

Thus it is not quite clear why MELP's developers chose this threshold
for voiced/unvoiced discrimination which may classify ordinary noise
as voiced what leads to buzziness.

Does anybody know what was the reason to choose these thresholds in MELP?

Thanks, Ilya Druker




(You need to be a member of speechcoding -- send a blank email to speechcoding-subscribe@yahoogroups.com )