Tweets by @dsprelated

A Quadrature Signals Tutorial: Complex, But Not Complicated

Understanding the 'Phasing Method' of Single Sideband Demodulation

Complex Digital Signal Processing in Telecommunications

Introduction to Sound Processing

Introduction of C Programming for DSP Applications

Markus received his Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering / communications in 1999. Work interests include RF transceiver system design, implementation, modeling an...show full bio

**Would you like to be notified by email when mnentwig publishes a new blog?**

Follow @DSPRelated

**Summary:**

A floating point model for a CIC decimator, including the frequency response.

**Description:**

A CIC filter relies on a peculiarity of its fixed-point implementation: Normal operation involves repeated internal overflows that have no effect to the output signal, as they cancel in the following stage.

One way to put it intuitively is that only the speed (and rate of change) of every little "wheel" in the clockworks carries information, but its absolute position is arbitrary.

Modeling a CIC filter without use of bit-accurate numbers is not completely straightforward. Here, I'll show some "instant" solution for the decimating variant. Just add water and stir.

**The good. The bad. The ugly.**

Let's start with "ugly".

The "time domain" implementation (complete code below) is what I get when I close my eyes to the numerical overflow problem and simply write the CIC difference equations with floats.

Now double precision arithmetics are quite forgiving, and it works well enough.

It should do fine for a classroom demo (and please don't use it in the next Mars mission).

Then, the "frequency domain" implementation:

- Take the FFT of the signal (assuming for simplicity it wraps around at the end - one cycle of an infinitely periodic signal - Fourier theory applies)
- evaluate the known frequency response of a CIC filter at the FFT frequency bins. Reference: [1], eq. 3
- Multiply
- Use IFFT to go back to the time domain
- Decimate

This is only "bad", as taking the FFT of the whole signal all at once might be inconvenient.

Finally, what I'd consider a "good" solution:

- Evaluate the impulse response before decimation
- Apply the impulse response using an off-the-shelf FIR filter component, i.e. filter() command in Octave / Matlab
- Decimate

The approach is accurate, as despite its internal recursion, the impulse response of a CIC filter has a finite length (it is of FIR type, not IIR).

To apply the impulse resonse *b* to an input sequence *x,* use y = filter*(b, 1, x)*;

**Plot:**

The plot shows that all three methods give exactly the same impulse response (accurate to ~10^{-15}). Decimating discards three samples out of four, leaving only red-trace samples that coincide with the other two traces.

**Frequency response**:

The frequency response is evaluated on the higher (input) rate. Therefore, it is straightforward to investigate the rejection on input frequencies that will cause aliasing, once decimated.

**Conclusion**

The example shows how to model a CIC decimator in floating point as a conventional FIR filter by sampling the finite-length impulse response.

**Download:**

**Code:**

% CIC decimator example% includes% - time domain implementation% - frequency domain model via z-domain transfer function% Parameters:% R = rate change factor% N = nStages% M = differential delay% reference: [1] http://www.altera.com/literature/an/an455.pdffunction instantCIC()close all;testvec = zeros(1, 43);R = 4;testvec(1) = 1;N = 3;M = 2;a = CICdec_timeDomainModel(testvec, N, M, R);[b, H] = CICdec_freqDomainModel(testvec, N, M, R, false);[c, H] = CICdec_freqDomainModel(testvec, N, M, R, true);figure(1); grid on; hold on;plot(1:R:R*numel(a), a, 'bx');plot(b, 'ro');plot(1:R:R*numel(c), c, 'k+');title('CIC decimator impulse response');legend('time domain', 'freq. domain', 'freq. domain decimated');% plotH = fft([ifft(H), zeros(1, 1000)]); % zero-paddingfigure(2); clf(); grid on; hold on;plot(linspace(-0.5, 0.5, numel(H)), fftshift(20*log10(abs(H) + 1e-15)), 'b');xlim([-0.5, 0.5]);title('frequency response');xlabel('f/fs');ylabel('dB');endfunction [vec, H] = CICdec_freqDomainModel(vec, N, M, R, doDecim)flag = isreal(vec);

% evaluate frequency response (z-domain transfer function)n = numel(vec);zInv = exp(-2i*pi*(0:(n-1))/n);b = ones(1, R * M);H = polyval(b, zInv) .^ N;H = H / H(1);% apply frequency responsevec = ifft(fft(vec) .* H);

% decimateif doDecimvec = vec(1:R:end);end

% don't let FFT roundoff error turn real signal into complexif flagvec = real(vec);endendfunction vec = CICdec_timeDomainModel(vec, N, M, R)nLeadIn = M * N * R;nLeadOut = nLeadIn / R;ix = mod(-nLeadIn:-1, numel(vec)) + 1;

% prepend end of cyclic signalvec = [vec(ix) vec];

% integratorfor ix = 1:Nvec = cumsum(vec);end% decimatorvec = vec(1:R:end);

% differentiatorfor ix = 1:Nvec = vec - circshift(vec, [0, M]);end% remove the added lengthvec = vec(nLeadOut+1:end);% scale gaingain = (R * M) .^ N;vec = vec / gain;end

Markus received his Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering / communications in 1999. Work interests include RF transceiver system design, implementation, modeling and verification. He works as senior architect for Renesas Mobile Europe in Finland.

Previous post by Markus Nentwig:

Next post by Markus Nentwig:

Comments / Replies

stephaneb

Said:

It looks like the image instantCIC3.png is too wide for the blog container. Great post Markus!

2 years ago

0

Sorry, you need javascript enabled to post any comments.

Sorry, you need javascript enabled to post any comments.