A Quadrature Signals Tutorial: Complex, But Not Complicated

Understanding the 'Phasing Method' of Single Sideband Demodulation

Complex Digital Signal Processing in Telecommunications

There are **13** messages in this thread.

You are currently looking at messages 1 to .

**Is this discussion worth a thumbs up?**

Hello, Can CRC be used for error correction (not just detection)? In particular, if the CRC-8 generator polynomial is x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 , can it be used for single error correction ?

_____________________________

edim wrote: > Hello, > Can CRC be used for error correction (not just detection)? Yes. CRCs are essentially Hamming or BCH codes, so they can be used for error correction. However by using them for error correction you are compromising the error detection capacity. > In particular, if the CRC-8 generator polynomial is x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 > , can it be used for single error correction ? If this is a prime polynomial, then it can correct a single bit error in a block of up to 255 bits. Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant http://www.abvolt.com

edim <e...@walla.com> wrote: > Can CRC be used for error correction (not just detection)? > In particular, if the CRC-8 generator polynomial is x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 > , can it be used for single error correction ? It depends on how much data you have. To be able to do single error correction the word size with ECC bits must be less than or equal to 2**N where N is the number of ECC bits. In addition, it is usually desirable to detect (but not correct) double bit errors, which requries one more check bit. (Usually the parity bit for the rest.) For magnetic tapes in the past, one used one parity bit per character, and a CRC (or some other type of check word) at the end of a block. If the CRC failed then the character with the wrong parity bit was likely the one in error. Given that, you might be able to correct the error. -- glen

_____________________________

Thanks, My message length is 72bits and I add 8bits for CRC using this generator polynomial. Is there a way to correct one bit in the received block of 80bits ?

_____________________________

Vladimir, The polynomial x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 is not prime because: x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 = (x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x+1)

edim <e...@walla.com> wrote: > My message length is 72bits and I add 8bits for CRC using > this generator polynomial. Is there a way to correct one bit > in the received block of 80bits ? Yes, absolutely. A plain vanilla single-error-correcting BCH code with 7 check bits can correct a single error for block lengths up to 127 bits. With 8 check bits, properly constructed, you can also detect all 2-error cases. See Sloane et. al, "A Survey of Constructive Coding Theory, and a Table of Binary Codes of Highest Known Rate", in _Discrete Math._, V. 3, pp 265-294, Sept 1972 for the full details for any similar problem, especially if you need to go beyond the BCH limit. Steve

_____________________________

edim <e...@walla.com> wrote: >The polynomial x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 is not prime because: >x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 = (x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+1)(x^2+x+1)(x+1) In this case you should measure the distance of the resulting shortened code; if it is at least three, then you can still do single error correction. This may be most rapidly done by simulation. Steve

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:31:50 -0600, Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote: > edim wrote: > >> Hello, >> Can CRC be used for error correction (not just detection)? > > Yes. CRCs are essentially Hamming or BCH codes, so they can be used for > error correction. However by using them for error correction you are > compromising the error detection capacity. > >> In particular, if the CRC-8 generator polynomial is >> x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 , can it be used for single error correction ? > > If this is a prime polynomial, then it can correct a single bit error in > a block of up to 255 bits. > > > Vladimir Vassilevsky > DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant http://www.abvolt.com BUT In the real world errors often come in bursts, so the value of the CRC as an indication that your whole message is probably corrupted gets totally lost. Serious FEC schemes use much higher correction bit/data bit ratios. -- Tim Wescott Control systems and communications consulting http://www.wescottdesign.com Need to learn how to apply control theory in your embedded system? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" by Tim Wescott Elsevier/Newnes, http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

_____________________________

edim <e...@walla.com> wrote: > My message length is 72bits and I add 8bits for CRC > using this generator polynomial. > Is there a way to correct one bit in the received block of 80bits ? Maybe. Since 2**8 >= 80 it is enough. It would be more usual to use Hamming codes, which directly indicate the bit in error. You need to find out that the CRC values are unique for each possible bit error, including errors in the transmitted CRC. If you find the dependence of each CRC bit on the 72 data bits, you can find out which one has to change based on the received CRC bits. I believe, but haven't verified, that each CRC bit is formed as an exclusive OR of a set of data bits. If you find that set, you can find which bit is in error. (If homework, be sure to reference the newsgroup.) -- glen

Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com> wrote: (snip) >>> In particular, if the CRC-8 generator polynomial is >>> x^8+x^7+x^6+x^4+x^2+1 , can it be used for single error correction ? (snip) > In the real world errors often come in bursts, so the value of the CRC as > an indication that your whole message is probably corrupted gets totally > lost. > Serious FEC schemes use much higher correction bit/data bit ratios. Actually, 8 bits as ECC for 64 bit RAM is fairly common. It is especially convenient as it is the same number of bits needed for byte parity, which may already be available. -- glen

_____________________________