There are 8 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 8.
Hi All, Does anyone have a good link to the theory behind why DCT is used for MFCC feature vectors? What exactly is it about the DCT values of the mel frequency spectrum that makes it so appealing for voice recognition. I understand it makes the values less sensitive to frequency, but how is that so? Thanks Rael______________________________
Hey stupident. Everybody is already sick of your idiotic questions. Why don't you start with some ABC book on digital processing before venturing into the complicated matters of voice recognition? Raeldor wrote: > Hi All, > > Does anyone have a good link to the theory behind why DCT is used for > MFCC feature vectors? What exactly is it about the DCT values of the > mel frequency spectrum that makes it so appealing for voice > recognition. I understand it makes the values less sensitive to > frequency, but how is that so? > > Thanks > Rael______________________________
nice to see you back in form, Vlad. sorta was wondering where you were during the DFT periodicity debate. r b-j On Mar 14, 10:21=A0am, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote: > Hey stupident. Everybody is already sick of your idiotic questions. Why > don't you start with some ABC book on digital processing before > venturing into the complicated matters of voice recognition? > > Raeldor wrote: > > Hi All, > > > Does anyone have a good link to the theory behind why DCT is used for > > MFCC feature vectors? =A0What exactly is it about the DCT values of the > > mel frequency spectrum that makes it so appealing for voice > > recognition. =A0I understand it makes the values less sensitive to > > frequency, but how is that so? > > > Thanks > > Rael > >______________________________
On Mar 14, 7:21=A0am, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote: > Hey stupident. Everybody is already sick of your idiotic questions. Why > don't you start with some ABC book on digital processing before > venturing into the complicated matters of voice recognition? > > > > > > > > Raeldor wrote: > > Hi All, > > > Does anyone have a good link to the theory behind why DCT is used for > > MFCC feature vectors? =A0What exactly is it about the DCT values of the > > mel frequency spectrum that makes it so appealing for voice > > recognition. =A0I understand it makes the values less sensitive to > > frequency, but how is that so? > > > Thanks > > Rael Feel like a big man now?______________________________
And I will solve the problem I'm trying to solve, with or without your useless comments. I always do.______________________________
Raeldor wrote: > And I will solve the problem I'm trying to solve, with or without your > useless comments. I always do. Sure. To start with, get down from the tree and try walking on the back paws.______________________________
On Mar 15, 7:13=A0am, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote: > Raeldor wrote: > > And I will solve the problem I'm trying to solve, with or without your > > useless comments. =A0I always do. > > Sure. To start with, get down from the tree and try walking on the back > paws. You know, I feel a little sorry for you. It's obvious you've been bullied or abused at some point and now feel like you need to prove yourself by name-calling people who are taking an interest in a subject you know something about. It doesn't make you look any smarter, it just makes you look like someone who needs help. I've met people like you before. You might know a lot, and you might even be smart, but you will never be content until you start treating people with respect, because no matter how much you know or how clever you are they'll never respect YOU until you do.______________________________
On Mar 13, 10:07=A0pm, Raeldor <rael...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Does anyone have a good link to the theory behind why DCT is used for > MFCC feature vectors? =A0What exactly is it about the DCT values of the > mel frequency spectrum that makes it so appealing for voice > recognition. =A0I understand it makes the values less sensitive to > frequency, but how is that so? > > Thanks > Rael You might try googling on the title of the thread. After a couple of pages of hits from this thread itself, there are a number of potentially useful hits in the top 100. I think some of the papers by Rosell may be responsive. Dale B. Dalrymple______________________________