Hi guys.

I want to learn about the Fractional Fourier Transform. Therefore  would
you be kind enough to suggest some "good" resources, if you are aware of
any (like tutorials on the topic)


I checked out Brent's website but did not find information on this one. 


Does Rick discuss FrFT in the newer edition of his book?



Any help would be appreciated.

On May 21, 9:07 pm, "third_person"
<t...@n_o_s_p_a_m.ymail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I want to learn about the Fractional Fourier Transform. Therefore  would
> you be kind enough to suggest some "good" resources, if you are aware of
> any (like tutorials on the topic)
>
> I checked out Brent's website but did not find information on this one.
>
> Does Rick discuss FrFT in the newer edition of his book?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.


I typed fractional fft into Google. Got 518,000 hits.
The first one was wikipedia.

Why not try that 1st?

Greg

On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:07:01 -0500, "third_person"
<t...@n_o_s_p_a_m.ymail.com> wrote:

>Hi guys.
>
>I want to learn about the Fractional Fourier Transform. Therefore  would
>you be kind enough to suggest some "good" resources, if you are aware of
>any (like tutorials on the topic)
>
>
>I checked out Brent's website but did not find information on this one. 
>
>Does Rick discuss FrFT in the newer edition of his book?
>
>Any help would be appreciated.
>
Hello third_person,
  Nope, I'm not familiar with fractional 
Fourier transforms.  But they do look interesting.
Ah, ...so much to learn, huh?

[-Rick-]

>Hi guys.
>
>I want to learn about the Fractional Fourier Transform. Therefore  would
>you be kind enough to suggest some "good" resources, if you are aware of
>any (like tutorials on the topic)
>
>
>I checked out Brent's website but did not find information on this one. 
>
>
>Does Rick discuss FrFT in the newer edition of his book?
>
>
>
>Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
>

"The Fractional Fourier Transform: with Applications in Optics and Signal"

Is a pretty complete book on the topic... slightly pricy though.

Just as a side note, there are multiple versions of the FrFt out there.
Most of which do not possess *all* of the qualitilies that was first posed
that the FrFt must posess. Very interesting topic, most of which got alot
of attention in the 80s in optics