
There are 4 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 0 to 4.
Hi all, First of all, let me state that this is not a joke and I'm perfectly serious. I'm researching design options for a proposed device to facilitate two-way language-based communication with bottlenose dolphins. One of the requirements is that this device is wearable by a swimmer in the water, and totally stand alone. As I see it, for the dolphin-to-human side of the system, I have need of a spacial filtering, target discrimination and tracking subsystem, in order to get a clean enough signal from a particular dolphin to make it through a recognition process. My thought for this is to use a head mounted line array of small hydrophones and a beam former. But I also wish to seperate the signals from multiple targets. So I'm thinking that I not only need several beam formers (one per target), but I also divide up the spectrum into many bands and for any given target, reject bands which do not have a strong signal coming from the same direction as a particular target. Obviously, I have to aim the beam former based upon the current target vector as either the dolphin or the swimmer moves around. So my question is this: do I put the filter bank before or after the beam former for a particular target ? If I filter before, doesn't that mean I need one bank per line array element per target ? What DSP chips might be able to handle this problem without needing Hoover Dam to power them ? I'm not only an newbie amateur in DSP matters. Any advice would be appreciated. Regards, Michael A. Hobson warrior (underline) mike (Y2K+1) (at) yahoo (dot) com Michael A. Hobson email: thesneakster (at) gmail (dot) com icq: #2186709 yahoo: warrior_mike2001______________________________
Michael A. Hobson wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all, let me state that this is not a joke and I'm perfectly > serious. > > I'm researching design options for a proposed device to facilitate > two-way language-based communication with bottlenose dolphins. One > of the requirements is that this device is wearable by a swimmer in > the water, and totally stand alone. > > As I see it, for the dolphin-to-human side of the system, I have need > of a spacial filtering, target discrimination and tracking subsystem, > in order to get a clean enough signal from a particular dolphin to > make it through a recognition process. > > My thought for this is to use a head mounted line array of small > hydrophones and a beam former. But I also wish to seperate the > signals from multiple targets. So I'm thinking that I not only need > several beam formers (one per target), but I also divide up the > spectrum into many bands and for any given target, reject bands > which do not have a strong signal coming from the same direction > as a particular target. Obviously, I have to aim the beam former based > upon the current target vector as either the dolphin or the swimmer > moves around. > > So my question is this: do I put the filter bank before or after the > beam former for a particular target ? > > If I filter before, doesn't that mean I need one bank per line array > element per target ? > > What DSP chips might be able to handle this problem without needing > Hoover Dam to power them ? > > I'm not only an newbie amateur in DSP matters. > > Any advice would be appreciated. > > Regards, > > Michael A. Hobson > warrior (underline) mike (Y2K+1) (at) yahoo (dot) com > > > Michael A. Hobson > email: thesneakster (at) gmail (dot) com > icq: #2186709 > yahoo: warrior_mike2001 Didn't you post something like this a few years back? Get a copy of Richard O. Nielsen, "Sonar Signal Processing". It will answer a bunch of questions. You need to tell us what the frequencies you intend to commune with the Dolphins are. It's not clear if you wish to transmit as well as recieve. I think that power is likely to be a problem. I also tend to think that an array might be too heavy.______________________________
Michael A. Hobson wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all, let me state that this is not a joke and I'm perfectly > serious. > > I'm researching design options for a proposed device to facilitate > two-way language-based communication with bottlenose dolphins. One > of the requirements is that this device is wearable by a swimmer in > the water, and totally stand alone. > > As I see it, for the dolphin-to-human side of the system, I have need > of a spacial filtering, target discrimination and tracking subsystem, > in order to get a clean enough signal from a particular dolphin to > make it through a recognition process. > > My thought for this is to use a head mounted line array of small > hydrophones and a beam former. But I also wish to seperate the > signals from multiple targets. So I'm thinking that I not only need > several beam formers (one per target), but I also divide up the > spectrum into many bands and for any given target, reject bands > which do not have a strong signal coming from the same direction > as a particular target. Obviously, I have to aim the beam former based > upon the current target vector as either the dolphin or the swimmer > moves around. > > So my question is this: do I put the filter bank before or after the > beam former for a particular target ? > > If I filter before, doesn't that mean I need one bank per line array > element per target ? > > What DSP chips might be able to handle this problem without needing > Hoover Dam to power them ? > > I'm not only an newbie amateur in DSP matters. > > Any advice would be appreciated. > > Regards, > > Michael A. Hobson > warrior (underline) mike (Y2K+1) (at) yahoo (dot) com > > > Michael A. Hobson > email: thesneakster (at) gmail (dot) com > icq: #2186709 > yahoo: warrior_mike2001 I'd look at placing your hydrophones in a more stable location than on the head. I have no strict evidence to suggest this, but I feel that the constant movement of the head might cause some issues with the beamformer. Instead I'd look at placing an array of hydrophones on the front and back of the swimmer, and then use a set of beamforming filters/processors to combine the signals to perform the same effect. There's quite a bit of information available for a similar situation using rf antenna, so there is a base of theory out there on it. The more targets you would wish to 'track' with the system would determine how many beamforming processors would be required. As for the filter bank you mention, I'm not 100% sure on what this filtering is for. If it is to simply attenuate out of band signals then it could be placed either before the beamforming processor or after, though after would probably make more sense if the filter has high performance requirements. Otherwise if it's a simple filter (such as low pass / bandpass and only order 2->4) then you could place it before the beamforming processor and allow it to act as an anti-aliasing filter for the likely digital sampled beamforming processor.______________________________
"Michael A. Hobson" <m...@crusader-services.com> wrote in message news:p...@4ax.com... > Hi all, > > First of all, let me state that this is not a joke and I'm perfectly > serious. > > I'm researching design options for a proposed device to facilitate > two-way language-based communication with bottlenose dolphins. You need to buy Dragon Dictate (Dolphin edition). I find it works well though the Dolphins have to train their voice by reading a passage of Jules Verne. Try it and see. McC______________________________