Tweets by @dsprelated

A Quadrature Signals Tutorial: Complex, But Not Complicated

Understanding the 'Phasing Method' of Single Sideband Demodulation

Complex Digital Signal Processing in Telecommunications

Introduction to Sound Processing

Introduction of C Programming for DSP Applications

There are **10** messages in this thread.

You are currently looking at messages 1 to .

**Is this discussion worth a thumbs up?**

Hai, I am in need of a frequency interpolator algorithm, which can find the arbitrary points "beteween the frequency bins". When I was going through the discussions in this group, I found few mails related to that but many of them are related to finding a particular peak frequency in the Spectrum. But my interest is representing a "N-point" spectrum as a "M-point" spectrum so that when taken IFFT of it I get back a resampled signal. Is this possible? Thanks in advance, Balaji

"balaji" <s...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message news:a...@posting.google.com... > Hai, > > I am in need of a frequency interpolator algorithm, which can find the > arbitrary points "beteween the frequency bins". When I was going > through the discussions in this group, I found few mails related to > that but many of them are related to finding a particular peak > frequency in the Spectrum. But my interest is representing a > "N-point" spectrum as a "M-point" spectrum so that when taken IFFT of > it I get back a resampled signal. Is this possible? > > Thanks in advance, > Balaji Your question isn't completely clear to me, but zero-padding of the time domain data before peforming the FFT might give you the additional interpolated points you are looking for. Note that you will not get increased frequency 'resolution' using this method. Cheers Bhaskar

"balaji" <s...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message news:a...@posting.google.com... > Hai, > > I am in need of a frequency interpolator algorithm, which can find the > arbitrary points "beteween the frequency bins". When I was going > through the discussions in this group, I found few mails related to > that but many of them are related to finding a particular peak > frequency in the Spectrum. But my interest is representing a > "N-point" spectrum as a "M-point" spectrum so that when taken IFFT of > it I get back a resampled signal. Is this possible? Balaji, It appears you're confusing two concepts: - interpolation in frequency and - interpolation in time. So, you need to have that straight..... To interpolate in frequency, you can do this: Start with a sampled time sequence of N samples. FFT this sequence for reference purposes. Now, append zeros to the original time sequence so there are now M samples; N generally nonzero samples and M-N zeros at the end. FFT this new sequence of M samples. The comparison of the first FFT and the second FFT is that the length N frequency sequence is interpolated into a length M frequency sequence. If you IFFT the length M sequence, you will get the original time sequence of N samples with M-N zeros appended. So, there is no resampling to be had by interpolating in frequency in this manner. If what you really want to do is increase the temporal sample rate then you can do this: Start with the original length N frequency samples. Repeat those samples until there are M frequency samples. That's a repeat of M/N - so M/N has to be an integer. This is a periodic spectrum with period N samples but we are now going to treat it as if it is periodic with period M samples. Multiply by the frequency response of a lowpass filter so that the bandwidth remains no greater than the original fs/2 which is now normalized to Mfs/2N. After lowpass filtering, IFFT. The result will be a time-interpolated sequence. If you really want to do both then: Add zeros to the original time sequence in order to interpolate in frequency. This does nothing to the temporal sample rate. FFT Repeat the frequency samples as above. This increases the temporal sample rate. Lowpass filter by multiplying. IFFT The result is a time sequence with a higher sample rate with a corresponding interpolated transform. It still has the zeros that were appended however..... probably perturbed by the filtering but perhaps not by much. (er... I think) There are some good articles at DSPGuru on interpolation. Fred

In article <a...@posting.google.com>, balaji <s...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: >I am in need of a frequency interpolator algorithm, which can find the >arbitrary points "beteween the frequency bins". When I was going >through the discussions in this group, I found few mails related to >that but many of them are related to finding a particular peak >frequency in the Spectrum. But my interest is representing a >"N-point" spectrum as a "M-point" spectrum so that when taken IFFT of >it I get back a resampled signal. Is this possible? Convolving the output of the N-point FFT with a Sinc function will interpolate a curve between the sample points related to the frequency bins. Of course, quantization and S/N ratio of the original data will limit the resolution of the interpolation. You will have to adjust the width of the Sinc function so that both N-point and M-point signal end up filtered to meet Nyquist criteria (different cases for M < N and M >= N). IMHO. YMMV. -- Ron Nicholson rhn AT nicholson DOT com http://www.nicholson.com/rhn/ #include <canonical.disclaimer> // only my own opinions, etc.

Hai, I think I did not put my question clearly. Aim of this exercise is resampling the signal. I can do this in time domain, by adding zeros followed by filtering. Can I bring about the same effect of resampling "in the frequency domain". That is 1. Take a block of input signals 2. Apply DFT to the above 3. Now if you have taken N points of DFT interpolate these N points to M points 4. Apply IDFT and get back the signal. Is the above process possible? You have nearly answered my question like this: > Start with the original length N frequency samples. > Repeat those samples until there are M frequency samples. That's a repeat > of M/N - so M/N has to be an integer. > This is a periodic spectrum with period N samples but we are now going to > treat it as if it is periodic with period M samples. > Multiply by the frequency response of a lowpass filter so that the bandwidth > remains no greater than the original fs/2 which is now normalized to Mfs/2N. > After lowpass filtering, IDFT. > The result will be a time-interpolated sequence. Problem is that M/N is not an interger. For instance, for a conversion from 44.1kHz to 48kHz the ratio is 160/147. In fact, for an oversampling by 2 I am presently using what you have told above. For ratios like 160/147, I have to know or interpolate the points between the DFT points. i.e I have to get values corresponding to points 0.91875, 1.8375, 2.75625 ... If this is a normal data, I can use polynomial interpolators. But my doubt is for a Spectal data(DFT), are there any special algorithms which will do this job? Thanks, Balaji "Fred Marshall" <f...@remove_the_x.acm.org> wrote in message news:<V...@centurytel.net>... > "balaji" <s...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message > news:a...@posting.google.com... > > Hai, > > > > I am in need of a frequency interpolator algorithm, which can find the > > arbitrary points "beteween the frequency bins". When I was going > > through the discussions in this group, I found few mails related to > > that but many of them are related to finding a particular peak > > frequency in the Spectrum. But my interest is representing a > > "N-point" spectrum as a "M-point" spectrum so that when taken IFFT of > > it I get back a resampled signal. Is this possible? > > Balaji, > > It appears you're confusing two concepts: > - interpolation in frequency > and > - interpolation in time. > So, you need to have that straight..... > > To interpolate in frequency, you can do this: > Start with a sampled time sequence of N samples. > FFT this sequence for reference purposes. > Now, append zeros to the original time sequence so there are now M samples; > N generally nonzero samples and M-N zeros at the end. > FFT this new sequence of M samples. > The comparison of the first FFT and the second FFT is that the length N > frequency sequence is interpolated into a length M frequency sequence. > > If you IFFT the length M sequence, you will get the original time sequence > of N samples with M-N zeros appended. So, there is no resampling to be had > by interpolating in frequency in this manner. > > If what you really want to do is increase the temporal sample rate then you > can do this: > > Start with the original length N frequency samples. > Repeat those samples until there are M frequency samples. That's a repeat > of M/N - so M/N has to be an integer. > This is a periodic spectrum with period N samples but we are now going to > treat it as if it is periodic with period M samples. > Multiply by the frequency response of a lowpass filter so that the bandwidth > remains no greater than the original fs/2 which is now normalized to Mfs/2N. > After lowpass filtering, IFFT. > The result will be a time-interpolated sequence. > > If you really want to do both then: > > Add zeros to the original time sequence in order to interpolate in > frequency. This does nothing to the temporal sample rate. > FFT > Repeat the frequency samples as above. This increases the temporal sample > rate. > Lowpass filter by multiplying. > IFFT > The result is a time sequence with a higher sample rate with a corresponding > interpolated transform. > It still has the zeros that were appended however..... probably perturbed by > the filtering but perhaps not by much. (er... I think) > > There are some good articles at DSPGuru on interpolation. > > Fred

s...@yahoo.co.in (balaji) wrote in message news:<a...@posting.google.com>... > Hai, > > I think I did not put my question clearly. Aim of this exercise is > resampling the signal. I can do this in time domain, by adding zeros > followed by filtering. Can I bring about the same effect of > resampling "in the frequency domain". That is > 1. Take a block of input signals > 2. Apply DFT to the above > 3. Now if you have taken N points of DFT interpolate these N points to > M points > 4. Apply IDFT and get back the signal. > Is the above process possible? Yes it is. Fred Marshall gave a very clear explanation in his reply to your first post. In fact, you quote his recipe here so I am sure you must have read it: > You have nearly answered my question like this: > > Start with the original length N frequency samples. > > Repeat those samples until there are M frequency samples. That's a repeat > > of M/N - so M/N has to be an integer. > > This is a periodic spectrum with period N samples but we are now going to > > treat it as if it is periodic with period M samples. > > Multiply by the frequency response of a lowpass filter so that the bandwidth > > remains no greater than the original fs/2 which is now normalized to Mfs/2N. > > After lowpass filtering, IDFT. > > The result will be a time-interpolated sequence. > > Problem is that M/N is not an interger. For instance, for a > conversion from 44.1kHz to 48kHz the ratio is 160/147. In fact, for > an oversampling by 2 I am presently using what you have told above. > For ratios like 160/147, I have to know or interpolate the points > between the DFT points. i.e I have to get values corresponding to > points 0.91875, 1.8375, 2.75625 ... > If this is a normal data, I can use polynomial interpolators. But my > doubt is for a Spectal data(DFT), are there any special algorithms > which will do this job? I am sure there are people out there who know this better than me, but I can vaguely remember hearing that the 44.1/48 ratio was deliberately chosen so as to make conversions between the CD and DAT digital formats particularily difficult. Rune

"balaji" <s...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message news:a...@posting.google.com... > Hai, > > I think I did not put my question clearly. Aim of this exercise is > resampling the signal. I can do this in time domain, by adding zeros > followed by filtering. Can I bring about the same effect of > resampling "in the frequency domain". That is > 1. Take a block of input signals > 2. Apply DFT to the above > 3. Now if you have taken N points of DFT interpolate these N points to > M points > 4. Apply IDFT and get back the signal. > Is the above process possible? Balaji, Yes. You can do something in the frequency domain. It might look like this: Instead of interpolating in frequency, you need to *extend* in frequency. (This is exactly the same type of operation as extending in time with zeros in order to interpolate in frequency while keeping the sample rate unchanged. That's what I explained before). Now the operations are flipped from time to frequency and from frequency to time and the zeros are put in the middle instead of at one end. So, add a sequence of zeros in the frequency domain that are equally distributed around fs/2 - that is, add them in the middle of the sequence. For example, if there are N samples, add N zeros from the N/2th sample. The new sample rate is at 2N. Then IFFT. The sample rate will be 2x higher than before. More zeros, higher temporal sample rate. The temporal epoch will remain unchanged because you have not changed the frequency resolution..... Fred

```
balaji wrote:
> Hai,
>
> I think I did not put my question clearly. Aim of this exercise is
> resampling the signal. I can do this in time domain, by adding zeros
> followed by filtering. Can I bring about the same effect of
> resampling "in the frequency domain". That is
> 1. Take a block of input signals
> 2. Apply DFT to the above
> 3. Now if you have taken N points of DFT interpolate these N points to
> M points
> 4. Apply IDFT and get back the signal.
> Is the above process possible?
>
I don't see why not. I did something similar by adding zeros in the freq
domain when going up in fs. The problem is that you probably want to do
this using 2^n length fft's (instead of prime fft's). Also use
overlap-add if you're processing blocks of data but my guess is that I
don't need to tell you.
```

```
Rune wrote:
...
> I am sure there are people out there who know this better than me,
> but I can vaguely remember hearing that the 44.1/48 ratio was
> deliberately chosen so as to make conversions between the CD and DAT
> digital formats particularily difficult.
When you look at the lowest common multiples of 44100 and 44100 +
k*100, for k in {0,1,...,50 } you'll see that 48000 is not at either
extreme (best case is 49000, worst case is 49100, worst case below
48000 is 47900).
I don't know the exact reason either. It would be interesting to hear
this from somebody who knows.
Regards,
Andor
```

hai, > Convolving the output of the N-point FFT with a Sinc function will > interpolate a curve between the sample points related to the frequency > bins. Of course, quantization and S/N ratio of the original data will > limit the resolution of the interpolation. You will have to adjust the > width of the Sinc function so that both N-point and M-point signal end up > filtered to meet Nyquist criteria (different cases for M < N and M >= N). Can you elaborate this idea a bit more? I didnot get the essence of this sync convolution yet. balaji r...@mauve.rahul.net (Ronald H. Nicholson Jr.) wrote in message news:<cbcn2h$5pl$2...@blue.rahul.net>... > In article <a...@posting.google.com>, > balaji <s...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > >I am in need of a frequency interpolator algorithm, which can find the > >arbitrary points "beteween the frequency bins". When I was going > >through the discussions in this group, I found few mails related to > >that but many of them are related to finding a particular peak > >frequency in the Spectrum. But my interest is representing a > >"N-point" spectrum as a "M-point" spectrum so that when taken IFFT of > >it I get back a resampled signal. Is this possible? > > Convolving the output of the N-point FFT with a Sinc function will > interpolate a curve between the sample points related to the frequency > bins. Of course, quantization and S/N ratio of the original data will > limit the resolution of the interpolation. You will have to adjust the > width of the Sinc function so that both N-point and M-point signal end up > filtered to meet Nyquist criteria (different cases for M < N and M >= N). > > > IMHO. YMMV.