Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- sooners? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Demodu-sooners
Started by ●April 13, 2015
Reply by ●April 13, 20152015-04-13
On 4/13/15 9:00 PM, Tim Wescott wrote:> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? > > Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- > sooners?<groan> listening to AC/DC with a DC-blocking filter. -- r b-j rbj@audioimagination.com "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
Reply by ●April 13, 20152015-04-13
On 14.04.2015 4:00, Tim Wescott wrote:> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? > > Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- > sooners? >I think, because DSP work tends to be completed later (not sooner) than expected. Evgeny.
Reply by ●April 13, 20152015-04-13
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:58:49 +0300, Evgeny Filatov wrote:> On 14.04.2015 4:00, Tim Wescott wrote: >> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on >> demodulators? >> >> Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing >> demodu- >> sooners? >> >> > I think, because DSP work tends to be completed later (not sooner) than > expected.Perhaps that's an effect of designing demodulators, though. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●April 13, 20152015-04-13
Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> writes:> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? > > Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- > sooners?You had better then design a modu-sooner sooner than later. -- Randy Yates Digital Signal Labs http://www.digitalsignallabs.com
Reply by ●April 13, 20152015-04-13
On 14.04.2015 5:07, Tim Wescott wrote:> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:58:49 +0300, Evgeny Filatov wrote: > >> On 14.04.2015 4:00, Tim Wescott wrote: >>> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on >>> demodulators? >>> >>> Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing >>> demodu- >>> sooners? >>> >>> >> I think, because DSP work tends to be completed later (not sooner) than >> expected. > > Perhaps that's an effect of designing demodulators, though. >May be. (Sigh.) Why real time systems cannot be designed in real time, too? Evgeny.
Reply by ●April 14, 20152015-04-14
Tim Wescott wrote:> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? > > Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- > sooners? >Only in Oklahoma. -- Les Cargill
Reply by ●April 14, 20152015-04-14
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 8:00:38 PM UTC-5, Tim Wescott wrote:> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? > > Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- > sooners? > > -- > > Tim Wescott > Wescott Design Services > http://www.wescottdesign.comI dunno, but to me, a non-native speaker of English (and Martian too!), "Iludium Q-36 explosive space modusooner" doesn't sound as good as "Ilidium Q-36 explosive space modulator."
Reply by ●April 15, 20152015-04-15
On 14.04.2015 22:39, dvsarwate wrote:> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 8:00:38 PM UTC-5, Tim Wescott wrote: >> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? >> >> Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- >> sooners? >> >> -- >> >> Tim Wescott >> Wescott Design Services >> http://www.wescottdesign.com > > I dunno, but to me, a non-native speaker of English (and > Martian too!), "Iludium Q-36 explosive space modusooner" > doesn't sound as good as "Ilidium Q-36 explosive space > modulator." >And what about "explosive space demodulator"? I know it's offtopic for this group, but there are some crazy theorists claiming that it's feasible to create portable emitters / detectors of high-frequency gravitational waves. But who said DSP is to be confined to the effects of the electromagnetic interaction, anyway? Regards, Evgeny.
Reply by ●April 15, 20152015-04-15
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:21:48 +0300, Evgeny Filatov <e.v.filatov@ieee.org> wrote:>On 14.04.2015 22:39, dvsarwate wrote: >> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 8:00:38 PM UTC-5, Tim Wescott wrote: >>> Why are comms professionals concentrating their efforts on demodulators? >>> >>> Wouldn't it be better to get ahead of the game and start designing demodu- >>> sooners? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Tim Wescott >>> Wescott Design Services >>> http://www.wescottdesign.com >> >> I dunno, but to me, a non-native speaker of English (and >> Martian too!), "Iludium Q-36 explosive space modusooner" >> doesn't sound as good as "Ilidium Q-36 explosive space >> modulator." >> > >And what about "explosive space demodulator"? I know it's offtopic for >this group, but there are some crazy theorists claiming that it's >feasible to create portable emitters / detectors of high-frequency >gravitational waves. But who said DSP is to be confined to the effects >of the electromagnetic interaction, anyway? > >Regards, >Evgeny. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuUJfYcn3V4 Eric Jacobsen Anchor Hill Communications http://www.anchorhill.com
