> thanks for the reply :-)
>
> what my point is..,
>
> If I shouted this line(" �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am
> " )
>
> think that the sound signal is sampled and played;
>
> and you too shouted the same line and the sample is
> captured and played;
>
> now the problem is while we are playing the 2 files we will hear the
> sound
> " �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am "
>
> my tone is different from yours; how that information is captured ?
It is captured in the sampling process. It is made apparent by
determining the harmonic structure and location of formants.
> Is the(tone) information is related to the amplitude of a wave ?
No.
...
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by Nimo●May 19, 20092009-05-19
thanks for the reply :-)
what my point is..,
If I shouted this line(" �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am
" )
think that the sound signal is sampled and played;
and you too shouted the same line and the sample is
captured and played;
now the problem is while we are playing the 2 files we will hear the
sound
" �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am "
my tone is different from yours; how that information is captured ?
Is the(tone) information is related to the amplitude of a wave ?
greetings
nimo
_____
�cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am
Ren� Descartes(1596�1650)
On May 19, 2:01�am, "wiltonmagik" <wilton.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't get what you mean by
>
> sampling a sound by some X tone.
>
> cud u simplify the case by using two different frequency sinusoids, or you
> want to deal with human voices only?
>
> >On May 17, 12:03=A0pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On May 17, 7:08=A0am, Nimo <azeez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Hi..,
>
> >> > well, in frequency domain if we sample a "sound" signal,
>
> >> > actually we are sampling "amplitude values" at discrete places
> >> > of the wave.
>
> >> > what my point is..,
>
> >> > if we sample this simple sound wave shouted by 2 persons
>
> >> > =3D> " =91cogito ergo sum=92 =96 I think therefore I am "
>
> >> > the sentences is same, but their "tones" are different
>
> >> > how that information( tone difference ) is captured ?
>
> >> > (1) =A0is the tone of a person is dependent on the amplitude
> >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 of that wave ?
> >> > ______
>
> >> > greetings
> >> > =A0 =A0nimo
>
> >> > Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are
> >> > impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax.
>
> >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -PHYSICIST LORD KELVIN , 1899
>
> >> This is a complex process when two voices are mixed. Voices are non-
> >> stationary and random in nature.
>
> >> Hardy
>
> >thanks Hardy for the reply :-)
>
> >basically, what my point is
>
> >first we will sample a sound signal by a person A's tone,
>
> >and then we will sample the 'same' sound signal by person B' s tone;
>
> >we will play the 2 files separately shouted by 2 persons;
>
> >same sound signal, but different tones;
>
> >what my doubt is..,
>
> >=3D> How that "different" tones information was captured ?
>
> >=3D> Is the tone information related to the amplitude of the wave ?
>
> >greetings
> > �nimo
> >______
>
> >If time travel is possible, then where are the tourists from the
> >future?
>
> > � � � � � � � � � � � � �-STEPHEN HAWKING
Reply by wiltonmagik●May 19, 20092009-05-19
I don't get what you mean by
sampling a sound by some X tone.
cud u simplify the case by using two different frequency sinusoids, or you
want to deal with human voices only?
>On May 17, 12:03=A0pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 17, 7:08=A0am, Nimo <azeez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi..,
>>
>> > well, in frequency domain if we sample a "sound" signal,
>>
>> > actually we are sampling "amplitude values" at discrete places
>> > of the wave.
>>
>> > what my point is..,
>>
>> > if we sample this simple sound wave shouted by 2 persons
>>
>> > =3D> " =91cogito ergo sum=92 =96 I think therefore I am "
>>
>> > the sentences is same, but their "tones" are different
>>
>> > how that information( tone difference ) is captured ?
>>
>> > (1) =A0is the tone of a person is dependent on the amplitude
>> > =A0 =A0 =A0 of that wave ?
>> > ______
>>
>> > greetings
>> > =A0 =A0nimo
>>
>> > Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are
>> > impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax.
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -PHYSICIST LORD KELVIN , 1899
>>
>> This is a complex process when two voices are mixed. Voices are non-
>> stationary and random in nature.
>>
>> Hardy
>
>thanks Hardy for the reply :-)
>
>basically, what my point is
>
>first we will sample a sound signal by a person A's tone,
>
>and then we will sample the 'same' sound signal by person B' s tone;
>
>we will play the 2 files separately shouted by 2 persons;
>
>same sound signal, but different tones;
>
>what my doubt is..,
>
>=3D> How that "different" tones information was captured ?
>
>=3D> Is the tone information related to the amplitude of the wave ?
>
>
>greetings
> nimo
>______
>
>If time travel is possible, then where are the tourists from the
>future?
>
> -STEPHEN HAWKING
>
>
Reply by wiltonmagik●May 19, 20092009-05-19
I don't get what you mean by
sampling a sound by some X tone.
cud u simplify the case by using two different frequency sinusoids, or you
want to deal with human voices only?
>On May 17, 12:03=A0pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 17, 7:08=A0am, Nimo <azeez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi..,
>>
>> > well, in frequency domain if we sample a "sound" signal,
>>
>> > actually we are sampling "amplitude values" at discrete places
>> > of the wave.
>>
>> > what my point is..,
>>
>> > if we sample this simple sound wave shouted by 2 persons
>>
>> > =3D> " =91cogito ergo sum=92 =96 I think therefore I am "
>>
>> > the sentences is same, but their "tones" are different
>>
>> > how that information( tone difference ) is captured ?
>>
>> > (1) =A0is the tone of a person is dependent on the amplitude
>> > =A0 =A0 =A0 of that wave ?
>> > ______
>>
>> > greetings
>> > =A0 =A0nimo
>>
>> > Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are
>> > impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax.
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -PHYSICIST LORD KELVIN , 1899
>>
>> This is a complex process when two voices are mixed. Voices are non-
>> stationary and random in nature.
>>
>> Hardy
>
>thanks Hardy for the reply :-)
>
>basically, what my point is
>
>first we will sample a sound signal by a person A's tone,
>
>and then we will sample the 'same' sound signal by person B' s tone;
>
>we will play the 2 files separately shouted by 2 persons;
>
>same sound signal, but different tones;
>
>what my doubt is..,
>
>=3D> How that "different" tones information was captured ?
>
>=3D> Is the tone information related to the amplitude of the wave ?
>
>
>greetings
> nimo
>______
>
>If time travel is possible, then where are the tourists from the
>future?
>
> -STEPHEN HAWKING
>
>
Reply by Nimo●May 18, 20092009-05-18
On May 17, 12:03�pm, HardySpicer <gyansor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 7:08�am, Nimo <azeez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi..,
>
> > well, in frequency domain if we sample a "sound" signal,
>
> > actually we are sampling "amplitude values" at discrete places
> > of the wave.
>
> > what my point is..,
>
> > if we sample this simple sound wave shouted by 2 persons
>
> > => " �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am "
>
> > the sentences is same, but their "tones" are different
>
> > how that information( tone difference ) is captured ?
>
> > (1) �is the tone of a person is dependent on the amplitude
> > � � � of that wave ?
> > ______
>
> > greetings
> > � �nimo
>
> > Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are
> > impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax.
>
> > � � � � � � -PHYSICIST LORD KELVIN , 1899
>
> This is a complex process when two voices are mixed. Voices are non-
> stationary and random in nature.
>
> Hardy
thanks Hardy for the reply :-)
basically, what my point is
first we will sample a sound signal by a person A's tone,
and then we will sample the 'same' sound signal by person B' s tone;
we will play the 2 files separately shouted by 2 persons;
same sound signal, but different tones;
what my doubt is..,
=> How that "different" tones information was captured ?
=> Is the tone information related to the amplitude of the wave ?
greetings
nimo
______
If time travel is possible, then where are the tourists from the
future?
-STEPHEN HAWKING
Reply by HardySpicer●May 17, 20092009-05-17
On May 17, 7:08�am, Nimo <azeez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi..,
>
> well, in frequency domain if we sample a "sound" signal,
>
> actually we are sampling "amplitude values" at discrete places
> of the wave.
>
> what my point is..,
>
> if we sample this simple sound wave shouted by 2 persons
>
> => " �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am "
>
> the sentences is same, but their "tones" are different
>
> how that information( tone difference ) is captured ?
>
> (1) �is the tone of a person is dependent on the amplitude
> � � � of that wave ?
> ______
>
> greetings
> � �nimo
>
> Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are
> impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax.
>
> � � � � � � -PHYSICIST LORD KELVIN , 1899
This is a complex process when two voices are mixed. Voices are non-
stationary and random in nature.
Hardy
Reply by Nimo●May 17, 20092009-05-17
Hi..,
well, in frequency domain if we sample a "sound" signal,
actually we are sampling "amplitude values" at discrete places
of the wave.
what my point is..,
if we sample this simple sound wave shouted by 2 persons
=> " �cogito ergo sum� � I think therefore I am "
the sentences is same, but their "tones" are different
how that information( tone difference ) is captured ?
(1) is the tone of a person is dependent on the amplitude
of that wave ?
______
greetings
nimo
Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are
impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax.
-PHYSICIST LORD KELVIN , 1899