On Aug 19, 4:47&#4294967295;pm, Venu <venugop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at using Matlab RTW & TC6 for prototyping a design on a TI
> DSP. Wanted to hear what other people's experiences have been with
> this approach. Looking to get feedback on potential downsides and
> pitfalls to look out for. Would also wlecome any suggestions for
> alternatives.
>
> Thanks,
> Venugopal

we use Matlab RTW/Simulink for SHARC processors for prototype and
design almost exclusively now. Code generation can get out of hand if
you don't know what you doing, but we never had algorithms that didn't
work when deployed.

>
>
>Venu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm looking at using Matlab RTW & TC6 for prototyping a design on a TI
>> DSP. Wanted to hear what other people's experiences have been with
>> this approach. Looking to get feedback on potential downsides and
>> pitfalls to look out for. Would also wlecome any suggestions for
>> alternatives.
>
>All you need is pencil and paper.
>
>VLV
>

After you get the pencil and paper Vladimir is talking about, you should
know the compatibility issues with the version of Matlab and the version of
Code Composer Studio. For eg, CCS 3.1 is only compatible with Matlab 2006a
and 2006b, for any later version you need to have CCS 3.3

Venu wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking at using Matlab RTW & TC6 for prototyping a design on a TI
> DSP. Wanted to hear what other people's experiences have been with
> this approach. Looking to get feedback on potential downsides and
> pitfalls to look out for. Would also wlecome any suggestions for
> alternatives.

All you need is pencil and paper.

VLV

Hi,

I'm looking at using Matlab RTW & TC6 for prototyping a design on a TI
DSP. Wanted to hear what other people's experiences have been with
this approach. Looking to get feedback on potential downsides and
pitfalls to look out for. Would also wlecome any suggestions for
alternatives.

Thanks,
Venugopal