Jimmy J. wrote:

> Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam@nowhere.com> wrote in
> news:U4udnQO40O-bVgDXnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@giganews.com:
> absolutely nothing. 
>  
> 
> Name-calling is cheap, dirtbag.  My allegation that you are an arrogant, 
> disrespectful, verbally-abussive asshole is backed up by your own posting 
> record in this thread alone.  Have a nice day. 
> 

Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:U4udnQO40O-bVgDXnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@giganews.com:
absolutely nothing. 
 

Name-calling is cheap, dirtbag.  My allegation that you are an arrogant, 
disrespectful, verbally-abussive asshole is backed up by your own posting 
record in this thread alone.  Have a nice day. 

Jimmy J. wrote:

> Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam@nowhere.com> wrote in
> news:U4udnQK40O-KVgDXnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@giganews.com: 
> absolutely nothing. 
> 
> 
> Name-calling is cheap, dirtbag.  My allegation that you are an arrogant, 
> disrespectful, verbally-abussive asshole is backed up by your own posting 
> record in this thread alone.  Have a nice day. 
> 

Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:U4udnQK40O-KVgDXnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@giganews.com: 
absolutely nothing. 


Name-calling is cheap, dirtbag.  My allegation that you are an arrogant, 
disrespectful, verbally-abussive asshole is backed up by your own posting 
record in this thread alone.  Have a nice day. 

Jimmy J. wrote:

> "JAlbertoDJ" <nietorosdj@yahoo.es> wrote in 
> news:dPudnTrYroqomADXnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@giganews.com:
> 
> 
>>>
>>>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just to add to what Steve Pope noted, your channel coding is very 
>>>>>>>unoptimal. Consider convolutional base 4 code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>base 4??? i dont understand. Could you explain better?
>>>>>
>>>>>Dual-K codes.
>>>>>Proakis 8.2.6.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Unfortunally, i have not that book and i dont find information about
>>>>Dual-K codes.
>>>>
>>>>But i am reading something about TURBO-CODES and Tutbo-Codes have an
>>>>interleaver inside.  
>>>>
>>>>Then, could be it the solution?  Are turbo-codes efficients for
>>
>>16CPFSK?
>>
>>>The chasm of your ignorance is really bottomless.
>>>
>>>If you don't have The Book Of Proakis, then you should go and get it. 
>>>And don't ask any questions before you read The Book from the first to 
>>>the last page.
>>>
>>>
>>>Vladimir Vassilevsky
>>>DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
>>>http://www.abvolt.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Thank you very much
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Don't give a second thought to the comments made by this arrogant, 
> disrespectful asshole.  I received exactly the same sort of verbal abuse 
> from him when, like you, I naively came here a couple of weeks ago 
> looking for information and help.  
> 
> 

Jimmy J wrote:

> Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam@nowhere.com> wrote in news:MfqdnYYF2sD-
> ygHXnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@giganews.com:
> 
> 
>>The chasm of your ignorance is really bottomless.
>>
>>If you don't have The Book Of Proakis, then you should go and get it. 
>>And don't ask any questions before you read The Book from the first to 
>>the last page.
> 
> 
> 
> As a previous victim of your verbal abuse, I don't feel so bad because I 
> now know that you didn't specifically single me out. Given your above 
> comment, there is no longer any doubt whatsoever my mind that arrogance and 
> verbal abuse are the primary, if not the only ingredients that comprise 
> your sad and pathetic MO.  The bottomless ignorance, which you assign to 
> the persone who naively came here for help, is only overshadowed by your 
> unbounded arrogance and your uncontrolled abusive tongue.  It is beyond me 
> to comprehend why you are here and why you respond in the offensive manner 
> that you do, but then I'm not a psychiatrist.
>    
> 
> 

"JAlbertoDJ" <nietorosdj@yahoo.es> wrote in 
news:dPudnTrYroqomADXnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@giganews.com:

>>
>>
>>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Just to add to what Steve Pope noted, your channel coding is very 
>>>>>>unoptimal. Consider convolutional base 4 code.
>>>>>
>>>>>base 4??? i dont understand. Could you explain better?
>>>>
>>>>Dual-K codes.
>>>>Proakis 8.2.6.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Unfortunally, i have not that book and i dont find information about
>>> Dual-K codes.
>>> 
>>> But i am reading something about TURBO-CODES and Tutbo-Codes have an
>>> interleaver inside.  
>>> 
>>> Then, could be it the solution?  Are turbo-codes efficients for
> 16CPFSK?
>>
>>The chasm of your ignorance is really bottomless.
>>
>>If you don't have The Book Of Proakis, then you should go and get it. 
>>And don't ask any questions before you read The Book from the first to 
>>the last page.
>>
>>
>>Vladimir Vassilevsky
>>DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
>>http://www.abvolt.com
>>
>>
>>
> Thank you very much



Don't give a second thought to the comments made by this arrogant, 
disrespectful asshole.  I received exactly the same sort of verbal abuse 
from him when, like you, I naively came here a couple of weeks ago 
looking for information and help.  

Vladimir Vassilevsky <nospam@nowhere.com> wrote in news:MfqdnYYF2sD-
ygHXnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@giganews.com:

> 
> The chasm of your ignorance is really bottomless.
> 
> If you don't have The Book Of Proakis, then you should go and get it. 
> And don't ask any questions before you read The Book from the first to 
> the last page.


As a previous victim of your verbal abuse, I don't feel so bad because I 
now know that you didn't specifically single me out. Given your above 
comment, there is no longer any doubt whatsoever my mind that arrogance and 
verbal abuse are the primary, if not the only ingredients that comprise 
your sad and pathetic MO.  The bottomless ignorance, which you assign to 
the persone who naively came here for help, is only overshadowed by your 
unbounded arrogance and your uncontrolled abusive tongue.  It is beyond me 
to comprehend why you are here and why you respond in the offensive manner 
that you do, but then I'm not a psychiatrist.
   

>
>
>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>
>>>
>>>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Just to add to what Steve Pope noted, your channel coding is very 
>>>>>unoptimal. Consider convolutional base 4 code.
>>>>
>>>>base 4??? i dont understand. Could you explain better?
>>>
>>>Dual-K codes.
>>>Proakis 8.2.6.
>>>
>> 
>> Unfortunally, i have not that book and i dont find information about
>> Dual-K codes.
>> 
>> But i am reading something about TURBO-CODES and Tutbo-Codes have an
>> interleaver inside.  
>> 
>> Then, could be it the solution?  Are turbo-codes efficients for
16CPFSK?
>
>The chasm of your ignorance is really bottomless.
>
>If you don't have The Book Of Proakis, then you should go and get it. 
>And don't ask any questions before you read The Book from the first to 
>the last page.
>
>
>Vladimir Vassilevsky
>DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
>http://www.abvolt.com
>
>
>
Thank you very much

JAlbertoDJ wrote:

>>
>>JAlbertoDJ wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Just to add to what Steve Pope noted, your channel coding is very 
>>>>unoptimal. Consider convolutional base 4 code.
>>>
>>>base 4??? i dont understand. Could you explain better?
>>
>>Dual-K codes.
>>Proakis 8.2.6.
>>
> 
> Unfortunally, i have not that book and i dont find information about
> Dual-K codes.
> 
> But i am reading something about TURBO-CODES and Tutbo-Codes have an
> interleaver inside.  
> 
> Then, could be it the solution?  Are turbo-codes efficients for 16CPFSK?

The chasm of your ignorance is really bottomless.

If you don't have The Book Of Proakis, then you should go and get it. 
And don't ask any questions before you read The Book from the first to 
the last page.


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com