Hi again,
I thought it might be useful to point out the following:
The working code I developed using CCS V3.3 (evaluation version) works on
both 5509 and 5509A boards when compiled in V3.3.
If I then compile it with V2.21 it will work on the 5509 board but not the
5509A board.
It appears to be hanging in one of the three IMG_xxxxxxx functions.
(unless I process a basic test pattern, in which case they all work ok)
is there a version V2.22 of the compiler?
Gwyn
Gwyn Evans
Mobile Video Systems
Drachenseestr 12
81373 Mchen
+4989491689 (Tel)
+491733510658 (Mobile)
+498936105615 (Fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Gwyn Evans [mailto:g...@gmx.net]
Sent: 28 March 2007 10:53
To: 'Jeff Brower'; 'Gwyn Evans'
Cc: 'c...'
Subject: RE: [c55x] Migration problems 5509 to 5509A
-Hi all, and Jeff
Thanks for the suggestion.
Since I sent that last email I have made a little progress:
I had previously tried the system at various CPU Speeds. I am able to test
the kernel up to 192Mhz(12Mhz*16) the core and USB all appeared to work
fine.
I downloaded the CCS V3.3 which incidentally only arrived with V2.0 if the
C55xx image lib. When I updated to V2.3 of the image lib I eventually found
that my DCT buffers were not correctly aligned causing the DCT to work but
process the data incorrectly. I now have a system that is working with the
CCS V3.3 a result... sort of. (I have a batch of 300x 5509A boards on their
way at least I know I can get these working)
My original CCS V2.21 will not compile working code. I find that the
routines
IMG_fdct_8x8(data, tmpBuffer);
IMG_jpeg_quantize(data, zig_zag, Q_table, outData);
IMG_jpeg_vlc(outData, pOutBuffer, VLC_status, 0);
All exhibit some sort of "hanging" behaviour.
With a probe on XF I can set XF H before the routine and L after, when I run
my test, XF will remain H and the system will re-boot.
I have all interrupts disabled.
EPIC suggested -vcore:2.2 and I also have -d:CHIP_5509A instead of
-d:CHIP_5509 set in the compiler.
Any bright ideas?
Gwyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Brower [mailto:j...@signalogic.com]
Sent: 26 March 2007 18:33
To: Gwyn Evans
Cc: c...
Subject: Re: [c55x] Migration problems 5509 to 5509A
Gwyn-
> I wonder if there is any one out there who has run in
to the same problems
> that I have while upgrading from 5509 to 5509A.
>
> My system is stable and works well with the 5509 but I recently had a
sample
> batch of boards back with the 5509A and they caused
some problems, most of
> which I Was able to solve. (I2C and DMA)
>
> The DSP is running at 96Mhz so I reduced the core voltage to 1.2v.
My guess would be there is no compiler, library, or other tools related
issue, as the two devices run exactly the same
instruction set. What happens if you take the 5509 cards and run at 100 MHz
(still under limit for 5509A at 1.2V).
You should have enough real-time margin in your code to do that. Do you
then see flaky behavior with original 5509
cards?
As you can see, I'm speculating that your "code dependent" issues are
actually there on both processors, but you're
just getting lucky not to see them on 5509 because some code or memory
timing is so close to the edge.
-Jeff
> The three routines in question are:
>
> IMG_fdct_8x8(data, tmpBuffer);
>
> IMG_jpeg_quantize(data, zig_zag, Q_table, outData);
>
> IMG_jpeg_vlc(outData, (int*)pOutBuffer, VLC_status, 0);
>
> Since I am capturing still images I get pseudo random data, I have known
the
> IMG_fdct_8x8 to be flaky when presented with 0x00 and
0xff but that was
> sorted out in a release some time ago.
>
> Is there anything special I need to do when compiling for the 5509A?
>
> Are the imageLib V2.3 compiled for the 5509A?
>
> Is there something Im missing?
>
> I have an embedded system which uses the 55ximagex.lib V2.3, and CCS 2.21
> (Integrated Development V2.20)
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Gwyn
>
> Gwyn Evans
> Mobile Video Systems
> Drachenseestr 12
> 81373 Mchen
> +4989491689 (Tel)
> +491733510658 (Mobile)
> +498936105615 (Fax)