Reply by Fred Marshall January 2, 20112011-01-02
On 12/25/2010 5:54 AM, Jerry Avins wrote:
> T see neither interpolation nor extrapolation when a CD player replace a missed with the previous one to fill in the time. I see it as just filling time with what is most likely a better value than one chosen at random. Is that too simplistic? > > Jerry
Jerry, FYI. This message has no "References" in the source. So, it splits the thread. I've just been starting to see this happen. Other messages from you have the "Reference" line. Best regards and Happy New Year! Fred
Reply by Eric Jacobsen December 25, 20102010-12-25
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:53:06 -0800 (PST), Clay <clay@claysturner.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 25, 11:03=A0am, eric.jacob...@ieee.org (Eric Jacobsen) wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:54:39 -0800 (PST), Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> >> wrote: >> >> >T see neither interpolation nor extrapolation when a CD player replace a= > missed with the previous one to fill in the time. I see it as just filling= > time with what is most likely a better value than one chosen at random. Is= > that too simplistic? >> >> >Jerry >> >> I think that's neither interpolation or extrapolation; that's an error >> control strategy. >> >> Eric Jacobsen >> Minister of Algorithms >> Abineau Communicationshttp://www.abineau.com > >It is a form of zero order hold albeit not being uniformly applied. > >Clay
A CD player often does it a codeword at a time, though, not a sample at a time. So it's not a ZOH in that sense. Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms Abineau Communications http://www.abineau.com
Reply by Clay December 25, 20102010-12-25
On Dec 25, 11:03&#4294967295;am, eric.jacob...@ieee.org (Eric Jacobsen) wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:54:39 -0800 (PST), Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> > wrote: > > >T see neither interpolation nor extrapolation when a CD player replace a missed with the previous one to fill in the time. I see it as just filling time with what is most likely a better value than one chosen at random. Is that too simplistic? > > >Jerry > > I think that's neither interpolation or extrapolation; that's an error > control strategy. > > Eric Jacobsen > Minister of Algorithms > Abineau Communicationshttp://www.abineau.com
It is a form of zero order hold albeit not being uniformly applied. Clay
Reply by Eric Jacobsen December 25, 20102010-12-25
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:54:39 -0800 (PST), Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org>
wrote:

>T see neither interpolation nor extrapolation when a CD player replace a missed with the previous one to fill in the time. I see it as just filling time with what is most likely a better value than one chosen at random. Is that too simplistic? > >Jerry
I think that's neither interpolation or extrapolation; that's an error control strategy. Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms Abineau Communications http://www.abineau.com
Reply by Jerry Avins December 25, 20102010-12-25
T see neither interpolation nor extrapolation when a CD player replace a missed with the previous one to fill in the time. I see it as just filling time with what is most likely a better value than one chosen at random. Is that too simplistic?

Jerry