wrote: >Hi all ! > >I'am currently using CCS2 and a TMS320C6711. > >I have a very simple question about the C6x compiler: Why is the ".text" >section much more small when compiling with the "-g" option than without? > >Thanks in advance. > >Cric. The c6x compiler generates different code when invoked with -g. The reason for this that more optimized will be more confusing to debug ( single steping becomes strange when code has been reordered and paralleized). As a rule of thumb , code that is optimized for performance typically has a larger footprint than code the are less optimized and I guess that is what you are seeing. /Regards, P Ligander > >:.________________ >CONFIDENTIALITE : Ce message et les entuelles pies attachs sont >confidentiels. Si vous n'es pas dans la liste des destinataires, veuillez >informer l'expiteur immiatement et ne pas divulguer le contenu une >tierce personne, ne pas l'utiliser pour quelque raison que ce soit, ne pas >stocker ou copier l'information qu'il contient sur un quelconque support. > > >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > |