Reply by richard i pelletier●December 20, 20122012-12-20
In article <kau6sv$n5j$1@speranza.aioe.org>,
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> commsignal <58672@dsprelated> wrote:
> > If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like
> > the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing
> > someone how high you stand?
>
> > I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable
> > folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
>
> You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make
> good suggestions.
>
> -- glen
i've had vlad killfiled for years, because i detest his attitude of
abuse and contempt. i'm lucky to be an interested amateur: if he's the
only person who can answer a question, i just don't need the answer.
rip
--
email address is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t
Reply by rickman●December 20, 20122012-12-20
On 12/20/2012 2:19 PM, rickman wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 8:50 PM, commsignal wrote:
>> If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like
>> the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of
>> showing
>> someone how high you stand?
>>
>> I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable
>> folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
>
> Your questions read like a homework assignment or a test. In fact,
> rereading your initial post makes me think this even more-so. "What has
> been/can be a good approach" has to be from a book or test.
>
> Give us a little background into who you are or why you are asking and I
> bet you get some reasonable responses.
>
> Meanwhile, wear a thick skin here. This group has it's share of ugly as
> you have seen, not as bad as some others for sure.
>
> Rick
Oh, I forgot. Feel free to edit the subject back to anything you want.
Stupident is as stupident does, to paraphrase Forrest Gump.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MT3CihStFQ
Rick
Reply by rickman●December 20, 20122012-12-20
On 12/19/2012 8:50 PM, commsignal wrote:
> If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like
> the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing
> someone how high you stand?
>
> I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable
> folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
Your questions read like a homework assignment or a test. In fact,
rereading your initial post makes me think this even more-so. "What has
been/can be a good approach" has to be from a book or test.
Give us a little background into who you are or why you are asking and I
bet you get some reasonable responses.
Meanwhile, wear a thick skin here. This group has it's share of ugly as
you have seen, not as bad as some others for sure.
Rick
Reply by Dave●December 20, 20122012-12-20
On Dec 20, 9:59�am, "Vladimir Vassilevsky" <nos...@nowhere.com>
wrote: Nothing worth remembering
Reply by Vladimir Vassilevsky●December 20, 20122012-12-20
"Dave" <dspguy2@netscape.net> wrote:
On Dec 20, 12:15 am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu>
wrote:
>> You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make
>> good suggestions.
>No Glen, I don't get used to him after awhile.
You just have to quit being stupident. That's all it takes.
Reply by Dave●December 20, 20122012-12-20
On Dec 20, 12:15�am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu>
wrote:
>
> You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make
> good suggestions.
>
No Glen, I don't get used to him after awhile.
Dave
Reply by glen herrmannsfeldt●December 20, 20122012-12-20
commsignal <58672@dsprelated> wrote:
> If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like
> the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing
> someone how high you stand?
> I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable
> folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make
good suggestions.
-- glen
Reply by commsignal●December 19, 20122012-12-19
If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like
the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing
someone how high you stand?
I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable
folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
>On 12/6/2012 9:48 AM, johan_mozart wrote:
>>>
>>> "commsignal"<58672@dsprelated> wrote in message
>>> news:pNWdnSbWhfI_pV3NnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I would be very grateful if some experts can give me their
opinions
>>>> about the following questions (from algorithmic perspective).
>>>>
>>>> (1) What has been/can be a good approach to a single carrier receiver
>>>> design (synchronization, channel estimation, equalization, etc.)
>> operating
>>>> at low SNRs? How would you go about frquency, timing, phase
>>>> synchronization
>>>> and equalization algorithms?
>>>> (3) What are the practical Es/No limits below which known algorithms
>>>> simply
>>>> don't work?
>>>> (4) Finally, how important can the role of decoders be in something
>> like
>>>> iterative decoding and synchronization?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> rude
>
>I'm not clear on what you are saying. Which is rude, the OP's asking
>someone to do his homework/test or Vlad's STUPIDENT comment?
>
>I think they both fall into the same category myself.
>
>Rick
>
Reply by rickman●December 7, 20122012-12-07
On 12/6/2012 9:48 AM, johan_mozart wrote:
>>
>> "commsignal"<58672@dsprelated> wrote in message
>> news:pNWdnSbWhfI_pV3NnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> Hi All,
>>> I would be very grateful if some experts can give me their opinions
>>> about the following questions (from algorithmic perspective).
>>>
>>> (1) What has been/can be a good approach to a single carrier receiver
>>> design (synchronization, channel estimation, equalization, etc.)
> operating
>>> at low SNRs? How would you go about frquency, timing, phase
>>> synchronization
>>> and equalization algorithms?
>>> (3) What are the practical Es/No limits below which known algorithms
>>> simply
>>> don't work?
>>> (4) Finally, how important can the role of decoders be in something
> like
>>> iterative decoding and synchronization?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>
> rude
I'm not clear on what you are saying. Which is rude, the OP's asking
someone to do his homework/test or Vlad's STUPIDENT comment?
I think they both fall into the same category myself.
Rick
Reply by Dave●December 6, 20122012-12-06
On Dec 6, 9:24�am, "Vladimir Vassilevsky" <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> "commsignal" <58672@dsprelated> wrote in message
>