Reply by richard i pelletier December 20, 20122012-12-20
In article <kau6sv$n5j$1@speranza.aioe.org>,
 glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:

> commsignal <58672@dsprelated> wrote: > > If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like > > the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing > > someone how high you stand? > > > I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable > > folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments. > > You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make > good suggestions. > > -- glen
i've had vlad killfiled for years, because i detest his attitude of abuse and contempt. i'm lucky to be an interested amateur: if he's the only person who can answer a question, i just don't need the answer. rip -- email address is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t
Reply by rickman December 20, 20122012-12-20
On 12/20/2012 2:19 PM, rickman wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 8:50 PM, commsignal wrote: >> If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like >> the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of >> showing >> someone how high you stand? >> >> I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable >> folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments. > > Your questions read like a homework assignment or a test. In fact, > rereading your initial post makes me think this even more-so. "What has > been/can be a good approach" has to be from a book or test. > > Give us a little background into who you are or why you are asking and I > bet you get some reasonable responses. > > Meanwhile, wear a thick skin here. This group has it's share of ugly as > you have seen, not as bad as some others for sure. > > Rick
Oh, I forgot. Feel free to edit the subject back to anything you want. Stupident is as stupident does, to paraphrase Forrest Gump. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MT3CihStFQ Rick
Reply by rickman December 20, 20122012-12-20
On 12/19/2012 8:50 PM, commsignal wrote:
> If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like > the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing > someone how high you stand? > > I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable > folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
Your questions read like a homework assignment or a test. In fact, rereading your initial post makes me think this even more-so. "What has been/can be a good approach" has to be from a book or test. Give us a little background into who you are or why you are asking and I bet you get some reasonable responses. Meanwhile, wear a thick skin here. This group has it's share of ugly as you have seen, not as bad as some others for sure. Rick
Reply by Dave December 20, 20122012-12-20
On Dec 20, 9:59&#4294967295;am, "Vladimir Vassilevsky" <nos...@nowhere.com>
wrote:  Nothing worth remembering

Reply by Vladimir Vassilevsky December 20, 20122012-12-20
"Dave" <dspguy2@netscape.net> wrote:
On Dec 20, 12:15 am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu>
wrote:

>> You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make >> good suggestions.
>No Glen, I don't get used to him after awhile.
You just have to quit being stupident. That's all it takes.
Reply by Dave December 20, 20122012-12-20
On Dec 20, 12:15&#4294967295;am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu>
wrote:

> > You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make > good suggestions. >
No Glen, I don't get used to him after awhile. Dave
Reply by glen herrmannsfeldt December 20, 20122012-12-20
commsignal <58672@dsprelated> wrote:
> If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like > the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing > someone how high you stand?
> I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable > folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.
You get used to him after a while, and pretty often he does make good suggestions. -- glen
Reply by commsignal December 19, 20122012-12-19
If I know less about something, I ask a question. If someone doesn't like
the question, s/he simply shouldn't respond. What is the benefit of showing
someone how high you stand? 

I have seen much simpler questions than this being answered by reasonable
folks here. And all I needed here was just some educated comments.



>On 12/6/2012 9:48 AM, johan_mozart wrote: >>> >>> "commsignal"<58672@dsprelated> wrote in message >>> news:pNWdnSbWhfI_pV3NnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>> Hi All, >>>> I would be very grateful if some experts can give me their
opinions
>>>> about the following questions (from algorithmic perspective). >>>> >>>> (1) What has been/can be a good approach to a single carrier receiver >>>> design (synchronization, channel estimation, equalization, etc.) >> operating >>>> at low SNRs? How would you go about frquency, timing, phase >>>> synchronization >>>> and equalization algorithms? >>>> (3) What are the practical Es/No limits below which known algorithms >>>> simply >>>> don't work? >>>> (4) Finally, how important can the role of decoders be in something >> like >>>> iterative decoding and synchronization? >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >> >> rude > >I'm not clear on what you are saying. Which is rude, the OP's asking >someone to do his homework/test or Vlad's STUPIDENT comment? > >I think they both fall into the same category myself. > >Rick >
Reply by rickman December 7, 20122012-12-07
On 12/6/2012 9:48 AM, johan_mozart wrote:
>> >> "commsignal"<58672@dsprelated> wrote in message >> news:pNWdnSbWhfI_pV3NnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@giganews.com... >>> Hi All, >>> I would be very grateful if some experts can give me their opinions >>> about the following questions (from algorithmic perspective). >>> >>> (1) What has been/can be a good approach to a single carrier receiver >>> design (synchronization, channel estimation, equalization, etc.) > operating >>> at low SNRs? How would you go about frquency, timing, phase >>> synchronization >>> and equalization algorithms? >>> (3) What are the practical Es/No limits below which known algorithms >>> simply >>> don't work? >>> (4) Finally, how important can the role of decoders be in something > like >>> iterative decoding and synchronization? >>> >>> Thank you. >> >> >> > > rude
I'm not clear on what you are saying. Which is rude, the OP's asking someone to do his homework/test or Vlad's STUPIDENT comment? I think they both fall into the same category myself. Rick
Reply by Dave December 6, 20122012-12-06
On Dec 6, 9:24&#4294967295;am, "Vladimir Vassilevsky" <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> "commsignal" <58672@dsprelated> wrote in message >