Shyju The silicon rev on the DSP package (i.e 1.1) and the rev in the register returned by CHIP_getRevId() are unrelated, in my experience. regards ------------------------ Stephen Turner AudioScience, Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shyju" <> To: <>; "Andrew Elder" <> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:17 AM Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > Continuing our discussion about RTDX and chip version... > I will list my findings.. > > 1.I tried the software version for getting the Rev Id- that is > CHIP_getRevId() CSL function on my C6416 chip .. which returned 1. More over > the return value of the the CSL call is of unsigned int which cannot take a > floating value(if chip is of ver 1.1 how it is reflected?). I have tried > the CSL call on a 6201evm PCI ver (PC-P-86M-94V-0 ) which supports RTDX > returned the value 2.. > 2.C6416 chip can be detected only using CCS2.2 and using sdgo6400_11 driver > which is supporting RTDX. > 3.It is written TMS320C6416GLZ > D11 - 32A2YEW > 2002 TI 62 > My doubts are whether any of this findings cofirms that this chip is of > PG1.1 silicon? If yes why the chip is not supporting RTDX? Please explain > it... > Thanks in adance... > Shyju > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Elder" <> > To: <> > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:44 PM > Subject: RE: [c6x] RTDX problem > > > > Also, FYI a call to CSL function CHIP_getRevId() will do the trick. > > The hardware way (below) is much simpler ! > > > > - Andrew E. > > > > > > At 10:22 AM 6/6/2003 +0200, Jean-Michel MERCIER wrote: > > > > >2 ways to identifiy silicon revision > > > > > >- The software way : > > > * If you are using CCS 2.1x, then it is a 1.0x silicon revision > > > * If you are using CCS 2.2x, you have a different driver > > > for v1.0x and v1.1. So as said by Par, depending on which > > > driver works for you, you will now the revision > > > > > >- The hardware way : it is simply written on > > > the DSP > > > The 1st line of the DSP should be something like TMS320C6415GLZ > > > The 2nd line should be D103 - <numbers> > > > This is a 1.03 silicon > > > v1.1 silicon have <letter>11 marking at the start of the 2nd line > > > > > > > > > Jean-Michel MERCIER > > > > > >-- > > >dsp & imaging - www.ateme.com > > >ATEME - 26 Burospace - 91573 BIEVRES > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Message d'origine----- > > >> De : Par Ligander [mailto:] > > >> Envoy: vendredi 6 juin 2003 08:31 > > >> : Shyju > > >> Cc : ; > > >> Objet : Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > > >> > > >> > > >> Shyju wrote: > > >> > > >> >Thanks for the fast response from P Ligander & Jeff Brower > > >> >I have tried RTDX in 6416 TEB from TI and also the board we > > >> designed using > > >> >C6416( Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3).How do I know the core is > > >> PG1.1 silicon ? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> http://focus.ti.com/lit/er/sprz011j/sprz011j.pdf > > >> Section 1.2 Revision Identifiaction > > >> > > >> Also, in CCS setup you should be using > > >> "C64xx Rev 1.1 XDS5x0......." > > >> > > >> /Regards, P Ligander > > >> > > >> >Pls clarify. The C6x series is more exiting with it's uncaomparable > > >> >features. But As a biginner I do have some difficulties in getting > alonmg > > >> >with C6416. Can any one send me any tutorial/Workshop material/ > > >> or any good > > >> >pdfs on these. Now I am exploring the examples of the CCS studio. > > >> > Thanks once again. Ur suggestions are very important to me... > > >> > > > >> >Shyju P.V > > >> >ERDCI > > >> > > > >> >----- Original Message ----- > > >> >From: "P Ligander" <> > > >> >To: "Shyju" <> > > >> >Cc: <> > > >> >Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:37 AM > > >> >Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >>Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... > > >> >> > > >> >>/Regards, P Ligander > > >> >> > > >> >>Shyju wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >>>Hello friends , > > >> >>> I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 > and > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described > > >> it here. Hope > > >> >any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >>> I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 > from > > >> >Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the > > >> tutorial section of > > >> >CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS > > >> >details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either > > >> we have to > > >> >put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform > the > > >> >step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create > > >> a Channel > > >> >for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB > and > > >> >our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no > > >> TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However > > >> >these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting > > >> EXE graph and > > >> >other things while the target is running.. We think the problem > > >> is with the > > >> >6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the > > >> very purpose > > >> >of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious > > >> problem as far > > >> >as we are concerned.Pls! > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >>> give us a clear answer to this . > > >> >>> > > >> >>>The programs we tried are... > > >> >>>Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. > > >> >>> > > >> >>>Doubts are.. > > >> >>>1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target > > >> for the data > > >> >transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >>>2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code > which > > > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >>>Best Regards, > > >> >>> > > >> >>>"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, > > >> >>>Jr. > > >> >>> > > > > > > _____________________________________ > > Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author > of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if > you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > > > _____________________________________ > > About this discussion group: > > > > To Join: Send an email to > > > > To Post: Send an email to > > > > To Leave: Send an email to > > > > Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > > > > Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > > > > > > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > ______________________________________ > Scanned and protected by Email scanner > _____________________________________ > Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > _____________________________________ > About this discussion group: > > To Join: Send an email to > > To Post: Send an email to > > To Leave: Send an email to > > Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > > Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > |