Reply by x-guy September 9, 20032003-09-09
> Seems like many folks like to correlate a copy of what is received > with a delayed copy of itself, but this method is not robust esp in > the presence of multipath.
Who told you that? It is easy to see that without other impairments, delay correlation will cancel channel effect! Write down some equations and you should see why!
Reply by santosh nath September 5, 20032003-09-05
wongchichian@hotmail.com (wong) wrote in message news:<34a4fe15.0309042210.17839aeb@posting.google.com>...
> Hi > Would like to know how to do frame synchronization in OFDM systems. > Seems like many folks like to correlate a copy of what is received > with a delayed copy of itself, but this method is not robust esp in > the presence of multipath. What is the best way? > Thanks all.
If you use double correlation method it will improve against multipath. In one correlation, you calculate cross correlation using known short preambles and find the peaks(Fine time sync.) Another you do auto correlation(Coarse sync.) of received samples with its delayed copy. This one will give plateau. You have take a joint decision point based on both correlations. Look at Cox's Paper. Regards, Santosh
Reply by wong September 5, 20032003-09-05
Hi
Would like to know how to do frame synchronization in OFDM systems.
Seems like many folks like to correlate a copy of what is received
with a delayed copy of itself, but this method is not robust esp in
the presence of multipath. What is the best way?
Thanks all.