Reply by HSDPA Discussions●January 10, 20052005-01-10
HI SANTHOSH,
I am studnet pursing Ms in Telecommunication .I need to know a
practical example with numberic valuies for turbo encoding and
decoing.Any materials pls send me..
I wanna kow in detial abt Sysytematic bit,Mother codes etc..
could u help me
my mail id
mahe2020@gmail.com
Reply by Andrew Reilly●February 27, 20042004-02-27
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:24:44 -0700, kbc wrote:
> Do i look like an idiot to think that ieee conducts an yearly auction
> to give away these designations ??
Your question about the purpose of the newsgroup gave exactly that
impression.
--
Andrew
Reply by Rune Allnor●August 13, 20032003-08-13
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message news:<3F381962.74B4704D@ieee.org>...
> Steve Underwood wrote:
> >
> > The less neat something really is, is the more it needs a good name.
> >
> > When someone says "how does your error handling work" do you really want
> > to say "the receiver gropes around in the dark, trying endless
> > possibilities, until it stumbles on its best guess at the actual
> > transmitted data". Isn't "we use Viterbi techniques to evaluate the
> > maximum likelihood sequence" better? Better still "we use Viterbi
> > techniques to evaulate the MLS" avoids a phrase that still sounds like
> > vague guessing.
> >
> > Regards
> > Steve
> >
> > Peter Brackett wrote:
> > >
> > > OTOH... any literature search will uncover the many unique contributions of
> > > Andrew Viterbi to communications sciences! It's just that the only one
> > > named
> > > for him is not that important and was not even discovered or invented by
> > > him!
>
> I don't know about the last improvement. Whenever I see "MLS", I think
> "PMS". I don't know why.
>
> Jerry
Perhaps because "MLS" puts an end to any discussion almost as efficiently
as "PMS" does...
Rune
Reply by Jerry Avins●August 13, 20032003-08-13
Eric Jacobsen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:32:02 -0400, Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> >Steve Underwood wrote:
> >>
> >> The less neat something really is, is the more it needs a good name.
> >>
> >> When someone says "how does your error handling work" do you really want
> >> to say "the receiver gropes around in the dark, trying endless
> >> possibilities, until it stumbles on its best guess at the actual
> >> transmitted data". Isn't "we use Viterbi techniques to evaluate the
> >> maximum likelihood sequence" better? Better still "we use Viterbi
> >> techniques to evaulate the MLS" avoids a phrase that still sounds like
> >> vague guessing.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Steve
> >
> >I don't know about the last improvement. Whenever I see "MLS", I think
> >"PMS". I don't know why.
> >
> >Jerry
>
> I sometimes think of realtors.
>
That at least make sense.
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by Peter J. Kootsookos●August 12, 20032003-08-12
kbc32@yahoo.com (kbc) writes:
> Do i look like an idiot to think that ieee conducts an yearly auction
> to give away these designations ??
Yes.
Ciao,
Peter K.
--
Peter J. Kootsookos
"Na, na na na na na na, na na na na"
- 'Hey Jude', Lennon/McCartney
Reply by Didier A. Depireux●August 12, 20032003-08-12
Clay S. Turner <physicsNOOOOSPPPPAMMMM@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> p.s. Trivia question??? What is the only (known to someone with one or two
> year's worth of physics/ e-mag) unit named for an American (non-immigrant)
> scientist?
Henry.
Didier
--
Didier A Depireux ddepi001@umaryland.edu didier@isr.umd.edu
685 W.Baltimore Str http://neurobiology.umaryland.edu/depireux.htm
Anatomy and Neurobiology Phone: 410-706-1272 (off)
University of Maryland -1273 (lab)
Baltimore MD 21201 USA Fax: 1-410-706-2512
Reply by Clay S. Turner●August 12, 20032003-08-12
"Stan Pawlukiewicz" <stanp@nospam_mitre.org> wrote in message
news:bhb8am$olt$1@newslocal.mitre.org...
> >
> Henry?
>
Stan,
Yes - you get the prize. I don't know what it is, but you get it.
I remember seeing some of his magnets at the Smithsonian. Pretty impressive.
See
http://www.si.edu/archives/ihd/jhp/
for more details on this man
Clay
Reply by Clay S. Turner●August 12, 20032003-08-12
"Jim Thomas" <jthomas@bittware.com> wrote in message
news:3F391E41.87031FE6@bittware.com...
> > p.s. Trivia question??? What is the only (known to someone with one or
two
> > year's worth of physics/ e-mag) unit named for an American
>
> --
> Jim Thomas Principal Applications Engineer Bittware, Inc
> jthomas@bittware.com http://www.bittware.com (703) 779-7770
> There's a fine line between clever and stupid
Reply by Stan Pawlukiewicz●August 12, 20032003-08-12
Jim Thomas wrote:
> "Clay S. Turner" wrote:
>
>>"Jonathan Y Stein" <author@dspcsp.com> wrote in message
>>news:bhb4su$590$1@news2.netvision.net.il...
>>
>>>However, the real champion of AC when Edison was out pushing DC
>>>was Nikola Tesla. And all he ever got was an infrequently used
>>>unit of magnetic field, and his initials were blasphemed with a non-Unix
>>>server operating system.
>>
>>Jonathan,
>>I don't know about the OS, but the unit, tesla, is hardly infrequently used!
>>When one first encounters magnetic flux density in first year physics, he
>>learns this unit. I know that I assign many problems that use teslas. A
>>common equivalent is webers per square meter. Some old schoolers may use
>>gauss for field strength, but the standard unit for field strength is tesla.
>>(1 tesla = 10000 gauss). A gauss is convenient when describing the Earth's
>>field near the surface. The density there is about 1/2 gauss.
>>
>>E-Mag used to be taught using gaussian units, but the paradigm is to now use
>>rationalized MKSA units, so the tesla has become the natural one.
>>
>>Clay
>>
>>p.s. Trivia question??? What is the only (known to someone with one or two
>>year's worth of physics/ e-mag) unit named for an American (non-immigrant)
>>scientist?
>
>
> Watt do you mean?
>
Henry?
Reply by Jim Thomas●August 12, 20032003-08-12
"Clay S. Turner" wrote:
>
> "Jonathan Y Stein" <author@dspcsp.com> wrote in message
> news:bhb4su$590$1@news2.netvision.net.il...
> >
> > However, the real champion of AC when Edison was out pushing DC
> > was Nikola Tesla. And all he ever got was an infrequently used
> > unit of magnetic field, and his initials were blasphemed with a non-Unix
> > server operating system.
>
> Jonathan,
> I don't know about the OS, but the unit, tesla, is hardly infrequently used!
> When one first encounters magnetic flux density in first year physics, he
> learns this unit. I know that I assign many problems that use teslas. A
> common equivalent is webers per square meter. Some old schoolers may use
> gauss for field strength, but the standard unit for field strength is tesla.
> (1 tesla = 10000 gauss). A gauss is convenient when describing the Earth's
> field near the surface. The density there is about 1/2 gauss.
>
> E-Mag used to be taught using gaussian units, but the paradigm is to now use
> rationalized MKSA units, so the tesla has become the natural one.
>
> Clay
>
> p.s. Trivia question??? What is the only (known to someone with one or two
> year's worth of physics/ e-mag) unit named for an American (non-immigrant)
> scientist?
Watt do you mean?
--
Jim Thomas Principal Applications Engineer Bittware, Inc
jthomas@bittware.com http://www.bittware.com (703) 779-7770
There's a fine line between clever and stupid