"yong" <yqin_99@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:be3c7875.0307170505.506cf2d3@posting.google.com...
> I am starting to learn the DSP by using the Analog DSP. I am wondering
> which one is "best" - I do not have target application now. just for
> learning DSP. What I mean "best" is that the chip architecture is
> current, stable, widely used, easy use(?), and the support for the
> chip last longer - some chip might be outdated.
>
> TigerSharc?
> Sharc? - will be replaced by TigerSharc?
> Blackfin?
As a fellow amateur, I found the ADSP-21065 to be a decent starting point.
It is a floating point "SHARC" and it has nice C/C++ development tools and a
cheap development board from ADI an also from other vendors. It seems to be
positioned as a high-volume, low-end floating point chip for consumer audio.
It is very active, so it is well supported and likely to stay around for a
little while.
Reply by yong●July 17, 20032003-07-17
I am starting to learn the DSP by using the Analog DSP. I am wondering
which one is "best" - I do not have target application now. just for
learning DSP. What I mean "best" is that the chip architecture is
current, stable, widely used, easy use(?), and the support for the
chip last longer - some chip might be outdated.
TigerSharc?
Sharc? - will be replaced by TigerSharc?
Blackfin?
Reply by yong●July 17, 20032003-07-17
I am starting to learn the DSP by using the Analog DSP. I am wondering
which one is "best" - I do not have target application now. just for
learning DSP. What I mean "best" is that the chip architecture is
current, stable, widely used, easy use(?), and the support for the
chip last longer - some chip might be outdated.
TigerSharc?
Sharc? - will be replaced by TigerSharc?
Blackfin?