
rob.hutchins wrote:
> Hello list,
> 
> I realize that this may be a very elementary problem, but I'm new to
> DSP and would very much appreciate your help.

Did you see my answer on the music-dsp list?


Bob
-- 

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no 
simpler."

                                              A. Einstein

Randy Yates wrote:

> Richard Owlett <rowlett@atlascomm.net> writes:
> 
> 
>>rob.hutchins wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm extremely sorry for the 4 redundant posts.  Google groups gave me 4
>>>server time out messages and my post was accepted on the fifth try.  I
>>>had no idea that the 4 earlier messages would show up.  Sorry!
>>>
>>
>>
>>When you use "free"
>>you get what you "pay" for ;]
> 
> 
> I'd ask for my money back...

They'll gladly give you double!

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;

"rob.hutchins" wrote:
> 
> I'm extremely sorry for the 4 redundant posts.  Google groups gave me 4
> server time out messages and my post was accepted on the fifth try.  I
> had no idea that the 4 earlier messages would show up.  Sorry!

Google is good for looking up old posts, but is otherwise an
extremely poor interface to usenet. I suggest that you might
want to looking into getting direct access to usenet. Maybe
ask you ISP how to do this.

Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc,
informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of
CommonLisp." -- Greenspuns Tenth Rule Of Programming

Richard Owlett <rowlett@atlascomm.net> writes:

> rob.hutchins wrote:
> 
> > I'm extremely sorry for the 4 redundant posts.  Google groups gave me 4
> > server time out messages and my post was accepted on the fifth try.  I
> > had no idea that the 4 earlier messages would show up.  Sorry!
> >
> 
> 
> When you use "free"
> you get what you "pay" for ;]

I'd ask for my money back...
-- 
Randy Yates
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
randy.yates@sonyericsson.com, 919-472-1124

Richard Owlett wrote:

> rob.hutchins wrote:
> 
>> I'm extremely sorry for the 4 redundant posts.  Google groups gave me 4
>> server time out messages and my post was accepted on the fifth try.  I
>> had no idea that the 4 earlier messages would show up.  Sorry!
>>
> 
> When you use "free"
> you get what you "pay" for ;]
> 
> [ not dumping on Google, same applies to Yahoo et al ]

The chances are that some server along the way -- not necessarily
Google's -- timed out on the confirmation.

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;

rob.hutchins wrote:

> I'm extremely sorry for the 4 redundant posts.  Google groups gave me 4
> server time out messages and my post was accepted on the fifth try.  I
> had no idea that the 4 earlier messages would show up.  Sorry!
> 

When you use "free"
you get what you "pay" for ;]

[ not dumping on Google, same applies to Yahoo et al ]

I'm extremely sorry for the 4 redundant posts.  Google groups gave me 4
server time out messages and my post was accepted on the fifth try.  I
had no idea that the 4 earlier messages would show up.  Sorry!

Hello list,

I realize that this may be a very elementary problem, but I'm new to
DSP and would very much appreciate your help.

If you are given a frequency response and you know that:

1. the part of the curve you're interested in can be modeled using a
narrow bandpass IIR filter

2.  you want to flatten that part of the curve

how would you design the inverse filter? Also, how would you achieve
the desired flat response?  

Thanks in advance,
Rob