Jim wrote:

>But if you've ever tried to
>get to sleep on a hot night without A/C, you might be willing to take
>the short view (at least until morning).

I guess it's easy for me to complain about airconditioning. We don't
really need it much around here (=Switzerland) ...

> Failure is always an option 

Oh well.

:-)

Regards,
Andor

Andor wrote:
> Jim Thomas wrote:
> ...
> 
>>Air conditioning may have destroyed the ozone layer - but it's been
>>worth it!
> 
> 
> That's got to be the dumbest signature I have ever seen. Jim, have you
> been exposed to ultra-violet radiation for too long :-) ?
> 

Thank you, and maybe.  An old friend of mine said that to me on a very 
hot day a long time ago.  I thought it was funny, and for the record, I 
do not really subscribe to the sentiment.  But if you've ever tried to 
get to sleep on a hot night without A/C, you might be willing to take 
the short view (at least until morning).

Maybe it's time to retire that entry.

-- 
Jim Thomas            Principal Applications Engineer  Bittware, Inc
jthomas@bittware.com  http://www.bittware.com    (603) 226-0404 x536
Failure is always an option

Jim Thomas wrote:
...
> Air conditioning may have destroyed the ozone layer - but it's been
> worth it!

That's got to be the dumbest signature I have ever seen. Jim, have you
been exposed to ultra-violet radiation for too long :-) ?

Jim Thomas wrote:
> less wrote:
> 
>> [Error li2523]  '__done_execution': Multiply defined symbol.
>> Initial definition:     '.\Debug\061__ezkit_hdr.doj'.
>> Attempted redefinition: '061_hdr.doj'.
> 
> 
> It looks like 061__ezkit_hdr.doj and 061_hdr.doj are both defining the 
> same things.  I think there are three ways to attack this problem, but 
> since I don't know the details of this ezkit, I don't know which one is 
> better.
> 
> You can either a) remove the source code from which 061__ezkit_hdr.doj 
> is compiled form your project,  b) tell your ldf file to quit linking in 
> 061_hdr.doj, or c) use an ldr file that already does b) for you.
> 
> My guess is that option c) is best, but I dunno.  If there is a special 
> ldr file that came with the kit, you could specify that.  If you don't 
> spec an ldr file, the IDE chooses a default for you (061_hdr.doj).
> 
> Good luck.

Oops.  Replace "ldr" with "ldf" all through the previous post.  I just 
got off a project that was heavily involved with ldr's.


-- 
Jim Thomas            Principal Applications Engineer  Bittware, Inc
jthomas@bittware.com  http://www.bittware.com    (603) 226-0404 x536
Air conditioning may have destroyed the ozone layer - but it's been 
worth it!

less wrote:
> [Error li2523]  '__done_execution': Multiply defined symbol.
> Initial definition:     '.\Debug\061__ezkit_hdr.doj'.
> Attempted redefinition: '061_hdr.doj'.

It looks like 061__ezkit_hdr.doj and 061_hdr.doj are both defining the 
same things.  I think there are three ways to attack this problem, but 
since I don't know the details of this ezkit, I don't know which one is 
better.

You can either a) remove the source code from which 061__ezkit_hdr.doj 
is compiled form your project,  b) tell your ldf file to quit linking in 
061_hdr.doj, or c) use an ldr file that already does b) for you.

My guess is that option c) is best, but I dunno.  If there is a special 
ldr file that came with the kit, you could specify that.  If you don't 
spec an ldr file, the IDE chooses a default for you (061_hdr.doj).

Good luck.
-- 
Jim Thomas            Principal Applications Engineer  Bittware, Inc
jthomas@bittware.com  http://www.bittware.com    (603) 226-0404 x536
Today is the last day of your life so far.

hi, 

ihave a adsp 21061(ez_kit lite board), and i want to save a few samples
from the line in and play them too. but this failure arrives i don't know
what to do.
can anyone help me please

C:\EZ-KIT\cc21k.exe .\Debug\Init.doj .\Debug\init1847.doj
.\Debug\notEs1.doj .\Debug\061__ezkit_hdr.doj -proc ADSP-21061 -L .\Debug
-flags-link -od,.\Debug -o .\Debug\record.dxe
[Error li2523]  '___lib_prog_term': Multiply defined symbol.
Initial definition:     '.\Debug\061__ezkit_hdr.doj'.
Attempted redefinition: '061_hdr.doj'.

[Error li2523]  '__done_execution': Multiply defined symbol.
Initial definition:     '.\Debug\061__ezkit_hdr.doj'.
Attempted redefinition: '061_hdr.doj'.

Linker finished with 2 error(s) 0 warning(s)
cc21k: Fatal Error: Link failed
Tool failed with exit/exception code: 1.
Build was unsuccessful.



		
This message was sent using the Comp.DSP web interface on
www.DSPRelated.com