> [...]
> shouldnt it be S'(t) = S(vT) instead of S(vt)??????
No.
--
Randy Yates
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
randy.yates@sonyericsson.com, 919-472-1124
Reply by aries44●June 3, 20052005-06-03
>"aries44" <omar_shahid2@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Convolution between A(t) and S (t) is defined as
>>
>> integral (-infinity to +infinity) with inside integral we have
>> A(T)S(t-T)dT, now suppose if we have A(T)S(vt-vT) inside that
intergal,
>> where 'v' is a constant. Can we still call it as a convolution?
>
>No.
>
>> if yes how
>> can we take care of 'v' and if its not a convolution how can we
manipulate
>> it to make it convolution?
>
>Let S'(t) = S(vt). Then what you have expressed is the convolution of
>A(t) with S'(t).
shouldnt it be S'(t) = S(vT) instead of S(vt)??????
>Randy Yates
>Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
>Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
>randy.yates@sonyericsson.com, 919-472-1124
>
This message was sent using the Comp.DSP web interface on
www.DSPRelated.com
Reply by ●June 2, 20052005-06-02
"aries44" <omar_shahid2@hotmail.com> writes:
> Convolution between A(t) and S (t) is defined as
>
> integral (-infinity to +infinity) with inside integral we have
> A(T)S(t-T)dT, now suppose if we have A(T)S(vt-vT) inside that intergal,
> where 'v' is a constant. Can we still call it as a convolution?
No.
> if yes how
> can we take care of 'v' and if its not a convolution how can we manipulate
> it to make it convolution?
Let S'(t) = S(vt). Then what you have expressed is the convolution of
A(t) with S'(t).
--
Randy Yates
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
randy.yates@sonyericsson.com, 919-472-1124
Reply by aries44●June 2, 20052005-06-02
Convolution between A(t) and S (t) is defined as
integral (-infinity to +infinity) with inside integral we have
A(T)S(t-T)dT, now suppose if we have A(T)S(vt-vT) inside that intergal,
where 'v' is a constant. Can we still call it as a convolution? if yes how
can we take care of 'v' and if its not a convolution how can we manipulate
it to make it convolution?
This message was sent using the Comp.DSP web interface on
www.DSPRelated.com