Reply by Gary Sokolich January 22, 20062006-01-22
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dqve6i0g1d@enews2.newsguy.com: 

 
> You are so incredibly predictable (and wrong).
Add pathological liar and hypcrite to incredibly predictable (and wrong) and you have a pretty accurate portrait of yourself. I can crank you any time I wish. :-) As is demonstrated by the fact that you respond to and blame me for every anonymous post,
> BTW: > > "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to > originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are > transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without > disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or > harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined > under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." > > H.R.3402 signed into federal law 1/5/2006
Not surprisingly, you conveniently left out the part about the said communication being obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent. We all know that you have serious trouble with the truth, but if you are going to quote readily accessible legal documents, you should at least quote them in their entirety and in context, and not just concatenate those parts that suit your malicious purposes. Finally, my posts are aimed at providing entertainment and a public service. Anyone who feels annoyed, abused threatened or harassed by my posts needs to get psychiactric help and needs to stop participating in newsgroups that are open to the public.
Reply by Bob Cain January 22, 20062006-01-22

Gary Sokolich wrote:
> Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in > news:dqruf301ac8@enews4.newsguy.com: > >> >> Tim Wescott wrote: >> >>> And you had time left over for writing papers? >> For you younger guys, _TAKE_ that time. That and patents with your name >> on them are an investment in the future that you can't afford not to >> make if you wish to remain technical all the way out. I think quite a >> few of us have learned that the hard way. >> Bob > > > The truth of the matter is that you don't have any patents because you > haven't ever done anything that is patentable. Given your particularly low > level of technical knowledge and competence, that is certainly no surprise.
You are so incredibly predictable (and wrong). I can crank you any time I wish. :-) BTW: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." H.R.3402 signed into federal law 1/5/2006 Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein
Reply by January 21, 20062006-01-21
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in 
news:dqruf301ac8@enews4.newsguy.com:

> > > Tim Wescott wrote: > >> And you had time left over for writing papers? > > For you younger guys, _TAKE_ that time. That and patents with your name > on them are an investment in the future that you can't afford not to > make if you wish to remain technical all the way out. I think quite a > few of us have learned that the hard way. > Bob
The truth of the matter is that you don't have any patents because you haven't ever done anything that is patentable. Given your particularly low level of technical knowledge and competence, that is certainly no surprise.
Reply by Bob Cain January 21, 20062006-01-21

Tim Wescott wrote:

> The topic (and working title) is "Applied Control Theory for Embedded > Systems". > > It's for all those digital guys who are now writing embedded software > for systems that have to implement closed-loop control.
Wish I'd had your book the first time I found myself in that position (in a tiny lab in a cornfield in northern Illinois in 1983 before the internet.) :-) Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein
Reply by Tim Wescott January 21, 20062006-01-21
Bob Cain wrote:

> > > Tim Wescott wrote: > >> Bob Cain wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Tim Wescott wrote: >>> >>>> And you had time left over for writing papers? >>> >>> >>> >>> For you younger guys, _TAKE_ that time. That and patents with your >>> name on them are an investment in the future that you can't afford >>> not to make if you wish to remain technical all the way out. I think >>> quite a few of us have learned that the hard way. >>> >>> >> I'm working on a book -- is that close enough? > > > Very good idea. :-) > > What's the topic? > > > Bob
The topic (and working title) is "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems". It's for all those digital guys who are now writing embedded software for systems that have to implement closed-loop control. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by Bob Cain January 21, 20062006-01-21

Tim Wescott wrote:
> Bob Cain wrote: > >> >> >> Tim Wescott wrote: >> >>> And you had time left over for writing papers? >> >> >> For you younger guys, _TAKE_ that time. That and patents with your >> name on them are an investment in the future that you can't afford not >> to make if you wish to remain technical all the way out. I think >> quite a few of us have learned that the hard way. >> >> > I'm working on a book -- is that close enough?
Very good idea. :-) What's the topic? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein
Reply by Tim Wescott January 20, 20062006-01-20
Bob Cain wrote:

> > > Tim Wescott wrote: > >> And you had time left over for writing papers? > > > For you younger guys, _TAKE_ that time. That and patents with your name > on them are an investment in the future that you can't afford not to > make if you wish to remain technical all the way out. I think quite a > few of us have learned that the hard way. > >
I'm working on a book -- is that close enough? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by Jerry Avins January 20, 20062006-01-20
Tim Wescott wrote:
> Jerry Avins wrote: > >> Joerg wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Here's a good guess: Dr. Gerald Goertzel >>>> >>> >>> Thanks! So it was indeed Gerald. I couldn't find his age anywhere and >>> thought that he couldn't possibly have published that famous filter >>> article back in 1958. But it seems he did. >>> >>> Regards, Joerg >>> >>> http://www.analogconsultants.com >> >> >> >> Hell, man, if I had been on the ball, I could have published in 1958. >> That's when my oldest was born. >> >> Jerry > > > And you had time left over for writing papers?
No. I was in college, trying to learn about continuous convolution from Misha Schwarts, first edition. When I invented the discrete version for myself as a learning tool, it came clear. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;
Reply by Bob Cain January 20, 20062006-01-20

Tim Wescott wrote:

> And you had time left over for writing papers?
For you younger guys, _TAKE_ that time. That and patents with your name on them are an investment in the future that you can't afford not to make if you wish to remain technical all the way out. I think quite a few of us have learned that the hard way. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein
Reply by Tim Wescott January 20, 20062006-01-20
Jerry Avins wrote:

> Joerg wrote: > >>>> >>> >>> Here's a good guess: Dr. Gerald Goertzel >>> >> >> Thanks! So it was indeed Gerald. I couldn't find his age anywhere and >> thought that he couldn't possibly have published that famous filter >> article back in 1958. But it seems he did. >> >> Regards, Joerg >> >> http://www.analogconsultants.com > > > Hell, man, if I had been on the ball, I could have published in 1958. > That's when my oldest was born. > > Jerry
And you had time left over for writing papers? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com