PARTICLEREDDY wrote:
>
> ANY FURTHER AGAIN NO APOLOGIES..i didnt do any mistake. if people
> presume my behaviour as rude, its their mistake.

PARTICLEREDDY> WHO'S THAT WALKING OVER MY BRIDGE?!

little_billy_goat_gruf> only me, only me, little billy goat gruf. i'm
going to the pasture to make myself fat.

PARTICLEREDDY> NO YOU'RE NOT, NO YOU'RE NOT,'CAUSE I'LL GOBBLE YOU UP!

little_billy_goat_gruf> don't take me, don't take me, take my bigger
brother.

PARTICLEREDDY> WHO'S THAT WALKING OVER MY BRIDGE?!


... etc.


--

r b-j

> >4. i have respect for each and everybody in this comp.dsp.
>
> And I'm the Pope.

One would suspect that this is the first-ever mention of the pope on
comp.dsp, but alas it is not.

On 19 Jul 2006 03:05:57 -0700, "PARTICLEREDDY"
<particlereddy@gmail.com> wrote:

>hi rick
>         really pity that i didnt even bothered about the answer or any
>questions i asked. seems you are hovering in a fantastic world that i
>will come to your office and that you do all the so said stuff. To tell
>frankly, you are no engineer by profession. you did talked all the dirt
>and saying that you didnt insult anyone. i think you are trying to
>impress upon the experts in this group. first and last thing, i dont
>involve in tussle with brutes (YOU) (SORRY, I DIDNT INSULT YOU). I
>
>points i would like to expand
>
>1. when somebody called my question funny, i replied that useless
>fellow aptly in a befiting manner, he could have asked "particle,
>please do provide more details instead of calling it as funny question
>and andor i answered well with full respect, i know him very well."
>
>2. second i didnt insult any one..

Well, I saw you do it, and you did it again in your first paragraph in
this post.

>3. i wont get provoked for unecessary and unwanted matters from others
>(as a matter of fact from you). (The say when elephants are marching
>royally, darks will be barking, so you are barking when i am not
>involved in tussle at all ...)
>
>4. i have respect for each and everybody in this comp.dsp.

And I'm the Pope.

>Also you post my reply in this group also.
>
>5. lastly you ask your mom and dad as why didnt they teach YOU
>manners,respect and common sense to you to not interefere in other's
>business.
>
>6. TO all dear respected members, i didnt involve in insult to anyone.
>
>7. Lastly this will be my last post in this topic, i solved my problem.
>
>
>---------------------BYE-----------------------------------

Yikes.



Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms, Intel Corp.
My opinions may not be Intel's opinions.
http://www.ericjacobsen.org

>
> 7. Lastly this will be my last post in this topic, i solved my problem.

How did you solve it? I'm curious, and would like you to help us to all
understand.

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

> 
> With additional explanation it makes slightly more sense, but still
> not much.  If the goal is an FFT of 10000 points, partial FFTs,
> other than those done by the FFT algorithm itself, are not really
> a partial solution.


No actually that is completely incorrect. In fact the opposite may have
been  the complete solution to the problem.

	 If the original signal were homogeneously stationary (as in all
frequencies  not varying over its entire length) and data arrived in the
form of random FFT blocks that were in lengths of powers of 2 (i.e. 128
256 512 ..) then deciphering the length of each individual block and
constructing an FFT (as well as an IFFT) of the entire record is in fact
quite trivial.

	Even if the signal were not completely stationary during the whole
record if it were only  changing very slowly with time the problem would
be fairly simple.

-jim

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"PARTICLEREDDY" <particlereddy@gmail.com> writes:
> before saying it as a funny question, try to put
> your brain into new technologies then you will know, where
> exactly this question has arised.

Maybe he is listening to radio through his teeth and he
is trying to decode the secret message.

> 7. Lastly this will be my last post in this topic, i solved my problem. 

Let me guess: you put your brain into a tinfoil had?
But Particle, this technology is not that new.

Anton

hi rick
         really pity that i didnt even bothered about the answer or any
questions i asked. seems you are hovering in a fantastic world that i
will come to your office and that you do all the so said stuff. To tell
frankly, you are no engineer by profession. you did talked all the dirt
and saying that you didnt insult anyone. i think you are trying to
impress upon the experts in this group. first and last thing, i dont
involve in tussle with brutes (YOU) (SORRY, I DIDNT INSULT YOU). I

points i would like to expand

1. when somebody called my question funny, i replied that useless
fellow aptly in a befiting manner, he could have asked "particle,
please do provide more details instead of calling it as funny question
and andor i answered well with full respect, i know him very well."

2. second i didnt insult any one..

3. i wont get provoked for unecessary and unwanted matters from others
(as a matter of fact from you). (The say when elephants are marching
royally, darks will be barking, so you are barking when i am not
involved in tussle at all ...)

4. i have respect for each and everybody in this comp.dsp.

Also you post my reply in this group also.

5. lastly you ask your mom and dad as why didnt they teach YOU
manners,respect and common sense to you to not interefere in other's
business.

6. TO all dear respected members, i didnt involve in insult to anyone.

7. Lastly this will be my last post in this topic, i solved my problem.


---------------------BYE-----------------------------------

Jerry Avins wrote:
> PARTICLEREDDY wrote:

>> ok andor,
>>              before saying it as a funny question, try to put your
>> brain into new technologies then you will know, where exactly this
>> question has arised. i am sorry, but your idiotic answer is provoking
>> me to say this..have brain and think and then only answer..

>> and further behave has an engineering professional before giving
>> USELESS and WORTHLESS ANSWERS.

> Your frustration is evident, but it doesn't justify rudeness.

I was about to say the same thing before reading your answer.
(I usually read newsgroups in reverse order, which complicates
replies sometimes.)

> Your question as stated is, if not funny, decidedly peculiar. Two 
> possibilities come to mind: either you just don't know what you're 
> asking about, or you're expressing yourself very poorly. I've been 
> trying to elicit the meat of the matter from you, but your rudeness put 
> me off. I'll await your apology before communicating with you again.

With additional explanation it makes slightly more sense, but still
not much.  If the goal is an FFT of 10000 points, partial FFTs,
other than those done by the FFT algorithm itself, are not really
a partial solution.

With a lot more detail of the source of the data it might be that
someone could come up with a reasonable answer.  Otherwise, I
think the answer is no, you can't do that.

-- glen

Andor wrote:
> [...]
> It does seem odd that you have data, but don't know how much of it you
> have.

Yes, quite 2*n + 1.

--Randy

On 17 Jul 2006 21:26:59 -0700, "PARTICLEREDDY"
<particlereddy@gmail.com> wrote:


>
>ANY FURTHER AGAIN NO APOLOGIES..i didnt do any mistake. if people
>presume my behaviour as rude, its their mistake.
>
>particlereddy

Hello Particlereddy, (it's too bad you chose not to 
give your real name.  However, I don't blame you---with 
behavior like yours, I would also be too embarressed to 
give my real name.)

What you must realize is that the fantastically 
talented guys here on comp.dsp are not your Mother, 
who thought anything you did was simply wonderful.

When you crapped in your diaper and smeared it on the 
walls your Mother thought that was really great.  
In that way, she gave you the false impression that 
anything you do is beautiful.  She deluded you into 
thinking that you arwe always correct.  
Well Particle, you are in the real world now.

If you want help from experts, show a little respect.
And if an expert says your question (which was truly weird, 
profoundly weird) was hard to understand then, instead of 
insulting the expert, you should re-phrase your question.

If you came into my office and talked to me the way you 
talked to the experts here, I would have grabbed you by 
the throat, squeezed until your eyeballs popped out, and 
thrown you out of my office.

Please notice how I did not insult you or curse you in 
any way.  I merely stated facts that I believe are true.
You have an opportunity now to better 
yourself and perhaps learn something from the 
gentle-mannered experts here about DSP.  
Don't screw it up!

[-Rick-]