Reply by Andreas Schwarz July 21, 20062006-07-21
Robert Latest schrieb:
> Hello, > > For a laoboratory measurement control / data acquisition system I'd like > to use a DSP board that plugs into a standard PC. A nice, low-cost card > that fits the bill is this one: > > http://www.signalogic.com/index.pl?page=pc32
Are you sure that you even need a DSP? Can't you use a simple AD/DA interface card and do all the calculations on the PC? Any recent PC processor is magnitudes faster than the old TMS320 on this board.
Reply by Robert Latest July 19, 20062006-07-19
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:26:49 -0700,
  Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> wrote
  in Msg. <Tvudnanvo_JaliDZnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@web-ster.com>

> 2. Consider your friendly local sound card. If you can get by with two > channels of AC-coupled data with 16-bit ADCs then your solution may > already be built into your motherboard.
I can't. I need 16-bit (true 16-bit) performance, four channels in, four channels out, from DC up. robert
Reply by Al Clark July 18, 20062006-07-18
Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> wrote in 
news:Tvudnanvo_JaliDZnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@web-ster.com:

> Robert Latest wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> For a laoboratory measurement control / data acquisition system I'd
like
>> to use a DSP board that plugs into a standard PC. A nice, low-cost
card
>> that fits the bill is this one: >> >> http://www.signalogic.com/index.pl?page=pc32 >> >> However, it only comes with an ISA slot. All PCI cards that I could
find
>> are much more expensive and have tons of additional performance that I >> don't need. >> >> Does anybody know of a simpler, cheaper model with PCI? I've actually >> seen stuff for "Compact PCI" or "PC104" buses -- but to use those I'd >> probably have to build te entire PC on this bus system which would
cost
>> more than a high-performance DSP board in a consumer PC. >> >> The board must be supported by Linux drivers. The actual DSP hardware
on
>> the board is of no importance because I'm starting from zero anyway,
as
>> long as the development tools are not prohibitively expensive for a >> University project. >> >> Thanks for any suggestions, >> >> robert >> ~ >> > 1. Analog Devices and Texas Instruments both make DSP chips with PCI > bus interfaces. > > 1.a. I know the TI chips have eval boards (made by Spectrum Digital) > that come with bare-bones drivers. > > 1.b. I strongly suspect that Analog Devices has the same thing > > 1.b.1. Danville Signal Processing -- http://www.danvillesignal.com/ -- > is an Analog Devices Only shop, they may have something. And Al, if > not, why not?
We don't have a PCI card. I worked on a few some years ago but never brought anything to production. If it lives outside the PC Box, we can probably help. Our boards have either high speed or full speed USB ports and RS-232. We have boards with built in EZ-Kit style debuggers. We are in the process of defining a set of PC/104 family Sharc based DSP cards. If you (or anyone) have ideas or an interest, let me know. Al Clark
> > 1.c. Ditto Freescale. > > 2. Consider your friendly local sound card. If you can get by with
two
> channels of AC-coupled data with 16-bit ADCs then your solution may > already be built into your motherboard. >
-- Al Clark Danville Signal Processing, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
Reply by Tim Wescott July 18, 20062006-07-18
Robert Latest wrote:

> Hello, > > For a laoboratory measurement control / data acquisition system I'd like > to use a DSP board that plugs into a standard PC. A nice, low-cost card > that fits the bill is this one: > > http://www.signalogic.com/index.pl?page=pc32 > > However, it only comes with an ISA slot. All PCI cards that I could find > are much more expensive and have tons of additional performance that I > don't need. > > Does anybody know of a simpler, cheaper model with PCI? I've actually > seen stuff for "Compact PCI" or "PC104" buses -- but to use those I'd > probably have to build te entire PC on this bus system which would cost > more than a high-performance DSP board in a consumer PC. > > The board must be supported by Linux drivers. The actual DSP hardware on > the board is of no importance because I'm starting from zero anyway, as > long as the development tools are not prohibitively expensive for a > University project. > > Thanks for any suggestions, > > robert > ~ >
1. Analog Devices and Texas Instruments both make DSP chips with PCI bus interfaces. 1.a. I know the TI chips have eval boards (made by Spectrum Digital) that come with bare-bones drivers. 1.b. I strongly suspect that Analog Devices has the same thing 1.b.1. Danville Signal Processing -- http://www.danvillesignal.com/ -- is an Analog Devices Only shop, they may have something. And Al, if not, why not? 1.c. Ditto Freescale. 2. Consider your friendly local sound card. If you can get by with two channels of AC-coupled data with 16-bit ADCs then your solution may already be built into your motherboard. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
Reply by Robert Latest July 18, 20062006-07-18
Hello,

For a laoboratory measurement control / data acquisition system I'd like
to use a DSP board that plugs into a standard PC. A nice, low-cost card
that fits the bill is this one:

http://www.signalogic.com/index.pl?page=pc32

However, it only comes with an ISA slot. All PCI cards that I could find
are much more expensive and have tons of additional performance that I
don't need.

Does anybody know of a simpler, cheaper model with PCI? I've actually
seen stuff for "Compact PCI" or "PC104" buses -- but to use those I'd
probably have to build te entire PC on this bus system which would cost
more than a high-performance DSP board in a consumer PC.

The board must be supported by Linux drivers. The actual DSP hardware on
the board is of no importance because I'm starting from zero anyway, as
long as the development tools are not prohibitively expensive for a
University project.

Thanks for any suggestions,

robert
~