Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 23, 20042004-06-23
Yes, me too... What a strange world this is sometimes... :-)

--smb

"Rob Vermeulen" <rpvermeulen@tiscali-antispam-.nl> wrote in message news:<40bcdb96$0$41747$5fc3050@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl>...
> Curious, > > > I like the artifacts of WMA. I haven't tried AACplus. > > You're one of few people who like artifacts, I make a living removing them. > :-) > > Cheers, > > Rob
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 7, 20042004-06-07
Tachyon <shifty@sidehack.sat.gweep.net> wrote:
> I meant > a signal, which when convolved with itself twice yields an > acceptable approximation of the target signal!
Hm, I still don't get it... what kind of signal is this supposed to be? --smb
Reply by Tachyon June 7, 20042004-06-07
On 2004-06-02, Stephan M. Bernsee <stephan.bernsee@web.de> wrote:
> Taking the cube root of the signal will not narrow its BW. > > --smb > > Tachyon <shifty@sidehack.sat.gweep.net> wrote: >> >> Personally, I'm really into the idea of encoding a signal using >> 1/3 the bandwidth as the cube root of itself. Then, to get the >> full signal, you just cube it!
You're right. I must have gone back and erased them....my first version of the post had quotes around cube root to indicate I don't mean pure cube root :) I meant a signal, which when convolved with itself twice yields an acceptable approximation of the target signal! -- different MP3 every day! http://gweep.net/~shifty/snackmaster . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . "Maybe if you ever picked up a goddamn keyboard | Niente and compiler, you'd know yourself." -Matthew 7:1 | shifty@gweep.net
Reply by Erik de Castro Lopo June 3, 20042004-06-03
Found this on Google Groups when I was looking for something
else. This never showed up on my news server (damn!)


> From: Rob Vermeulen (rvermeulen@arbor-audio-antispam-.com) > Subject: Re: Audio Artifacts: WAV vs. WMA > Newsgroups: comp.dsp > Date: 2004-06-02 07:38:55 PST > > Erik, > > Thanks for showing me this. Do you happen to know if there's > an original spec available for the WMA codec behaviour?
I don't beliebe that there is a publicly available spec for the codec. I think the the code in the URL I posted was generated by disassembling the windows DLL, but I don't know for sure. microsoft does have a specification for the ASF container format but last time I looked (about 2000) the spec was incorrect, incomplete and insufficient to write code from. I think most specs are like that. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ A good debugger is no substitute for a good test suite.
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 3, 20042004-06-03
Damn Google - gave me a timeout error when I pressed "submit" but
apparently the error was my believing I could trust these messages...
but even they appear to be unreliable... :-)

Sorry for that.

--smb

Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Stephan M. Bernsee wrote: > > > Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: > > > >>Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with > >>left-handed threads? > > > > > > No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller... > > > > --smb > > All right! All right! You made your point! > > Jerry
Reply by Jerry Avins June 3, 20042004-06-03
Stephan M. Bernsee wrote:

> Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: > >>Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with >>left-handed threads? > > > No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller... > > --smb
All right! All right! You made your point! Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;&#2013266095;
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with > left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller... --smb
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with > left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller... --smb
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with > left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller... --smb
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with > left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller... --smb