Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 23, 20042004-06-23
Yes, me too... What a strange world this is sometimes... :-)
--smb
"Rob Vermeulen" <rpvermeulen@tiscali-antispam-.nl> wrote in message news:<40bcdb96$0$41747$5fc3050@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl>...
> Curious,
>
> > I like the artifacts of WMA. I haven't tried AACplus.
>
> You're one of few people who like artifacts, I make a living removing them.
> :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 7, 20042004-06-07
Tachyon <shifty@sidehack.sat.gweep.net> wrote:
> I meant
> a signal, which when convolved with itself twice yields an
> acceptable approximation of the target signal!
Hm, I still don't get it... what kind of signal is this supposed to be?
--smb
Reply by Tachyon●June 7, 20042004-06-07
On 2004-06-02, Stephan M. Bernsee <stephan.bernsee@web.de> wrote:
> Taking the cube root of the signal will not narrow its BW.
>
> --smb
>
> Tachyon <shifty@sidehack.sat.gweep.net> wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I'm really into the idea of encoding a signal using
>> 1/3 the bandwidth as the cube root of itself. Then, to get the
>> full signal, you just cube it!
You're right. I must have gone back and erased them....my first
version of the post had quotes around
cube root to indicate I don't mean pure cube root :) I meant
a signal, which when convolved with itself twice yields an
acceptable approximation of the target signal!
--
different MP3 every day! http://gweep.net/~shifty/snackmaster
. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .
"Maybe if you ever picked up a goddamn keyboard | Niente
and compiler, you'd know yourself." -Matthew 7:1 | shifty@gweep.net
Reply by Erik de Castro Lopo●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Found this on Google Groups when I was looking for something
else. This never showed up on my news server (damn!)
> From: Rob Vermeulen (rvermeulen@arbor-audio-antispam-.com)
> Subject: Re: Audio Artifacts: WAV vs. WMA
> Newsgroups: comp.dsp
> Date: 2004-06-02 07:38:55 PST
>
> Erik,
>
> Thanks for showing me this. Do you happen to know if there's
> an original spec available for the WMA codec behaviour?
I don't beliebe that there is a publicly available spec for the
codec. I think the the code in the URL I posted was generated
by disassembling the windows DLL, but I don't know for sure.
microsoft does have a specification for the ASF container format
but last time I looked (about 2000) the spec was incorrect,
incomplete and insufficient to write code from. I think most
specs are like that.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo nospam@mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
A good debugger is no substitute for a good test suite.
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Damn Google - gave me a timeout error when I pressed "submit" but
apparently the error was my believing I could trust these messages...
but even they appear to be unreliable... :-)
Sorry for that.
--smb
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Stephan M. Bernsee wrote:
>
> > Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with
> >>left-handed threads?
> >
> >
> > No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller...
> >
> > --smb
>
> All right! All right! You made your point!
>
> Jerry
Reply by Jerry Avins●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Stephan M. Bernsee wrote:
> Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>>Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with
>>left-handed threads?
>
>
> No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller...
>
> --smb
All right! All right! You made your point!
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with
> left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller...
--smb
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with
> left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller...
--smb
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with
> left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller...
--smb
Reply by Stephan M. Bernsee●June 3, 20042004-06-03
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote:
> Oh? You mean you don't need a left-handed wrench to turn nuts with
> left-handed threads?
No Jerry, I believe taking the nuts off doesn't make the machine any smaller...
--smb