Reply by Jerry Avins May 18, 20042004-05-18
Richard Owlett wrote:

> I started playing with some human perceptible audio questions. > > If I understand correctly, humans perceive audio levels on a log power > scale. > > I'm starting to look a spectrum analysis problem ( intentionally vague > as I'm not sure of what I want to look at ;) > > I wish to plot "data". > Linear in intensity has obvious problems. > > Log (intensity squared) has much history. > > BUT I wish to look at a a VERY wide dynamic range on a visual plot. > > I have reason to believe that plotting (log(log(intensity squared))) may > point out 'interesting' features. > > BUT, does it have any intrinsic significance?
Significance? Dunno. Realize, first of all, that log(I^2) = 2*log(I), so that by squaring, you simply change the log's scale. A linear plot gives equal increments equal sizes. A log plot gives equal relative changes equal sizes. I.e., a certain ratio corresponds to a certain distance on the axis. Logarithmic intensity is linear dB. Your question amounts to "Logarithmic dB is linear _____" Fill in the blank, and you answered your own question. (It's not hard to fit the entire dynamic range of hearing on a note-book size graph that you can read values from.) Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by Richard Owlett May 18, 20042004-05-18
I started playing with some human perceptible audio questions.

If I understand correctly, humans perceive audio levels on a log power 
scale.

I'm starting to look a spectrum analysis problem ( intentionally vague 
as I'm not sure of what I want to look at ;)

I wish to plot "data".
Linear in intensity has obvious problems.

Log (intensity squared) has much history.

BUT I wish to look at a a VERY wide dynamic range on a visual plot.

I have reason to believe that plotting (log(log(intensity squared))) 
may point out 'interesting' features.

BUT, does it have any intrinsic significance?