> I started playing with some human perceptible audio questions.
>
> If I understand correctly, humans perceive audio levels on a log power
> scale.
>
> I'm starting to look a spectrum analysis problem ( intentionally vague
> as I'm not sure of what I want to look at ;)
>
> I wish to plot "data".
> Linear in intensity has obvious problems.
>
> Log (intensity squared) has much history.
>
> BUT I wish to look at a a VERY wide dynamic range on a visual plot.
>
> I have reason to believe that plotting (log(log(intensity squared))) may
> point out 'interesting' features.
>
> BUT, does it have any intrinsic significance?
Significance? Dunno. Realize, first of all, that log(I^2) = 2*log(I), so
that by squaring, you simply change the log's scale. A linear plot gives
equal increments equal sizes. A log plot gives equal relative changes
equal sizes. I.e., a certain ratio corresponds to a certain distance
on the axis. Logarithmic intensity is linear dB. Your question amounts
to "Logarithmic dB is linear _____" Fill in the blank, and you answered
your own question. (It's not hard to fit the entire dynamic range of
hearing on a note-book size graph that you can read values from.)
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by Richard Owlett●May 18, 20042004-05-18
I started playing with some human perceptible audio questions.
If I understand correctly, humans perceive audio levels on a log power
scale.
I'm starting to look a spectrum analysis problem ( intentionally vague
as I'm not sure of what I want to look at ;)
I wish to plot "data".
Linear in intensity has obvious problems.
Log (intensity squared) has much history.
BUT I wish to look at a a VERY wide dynamic range on a visual plot.
I have reason to believe that plotting (log(log(intensity squared)))
may point out 'interesting' features.
BUT, does it have any intrinsic significance?