conceptually either by increasing symbol duration, or using a wider
bandwidth
Reply by ●January 3, 20082008-01-03
Sorry about my wrong concept on subcarriers. Thanks Richard and
Krishna for correcting me.
What i have done is about the same with the 2nd link provided by
Krishna. But, i do the equalization for data in the format of [Nx1].
That's the reason why i had misinterpreted the term subcarriers. I
wish to know whether my method is acceptable or not. As far as i know,
the first link is the one i thought i will be doing.
Sorry for any mistakes made. Thanks for ur patience.
Reply by Krishna●January 2, 20082008-01-02
On Jan 2, 10:14 pm, kelvi...@gmail.com wrote:
> So far, i have been doing
> equalization for one ofdm symbol. I wish to ask how could i add more
> subcarriers in by using Simulink?
Problem statement not clear enough (atleast for me).
One OFDM symbol should have multiple subcarriers. When you did
equalization for one symbol,
you might have defined multiple subcarriers, no?
> I am doing a project on OFDM equalization. So far, i have been doing
> equalization for one ofdm symbol. I wish to ask how could i add more
> subcarriers in by using Simulink? Is there any example that i can
> refer to?
>
> Thanks alot.
I am doing a project on OFDM equalization. So far, i have been doing
equalization for one ofdm symbol. I wish to ask how could i add more
subcarriers in by using Simulink? Is there any example that i can
refer to?
Thanks alot.