On Feb 26, 6:28&#4294967295;pm, c...@claysturner.com wrote:
> On Feb 25, 8:18&#4294967295;pm, "maxplanck" <erik.bo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > TheHilberttransformof a sine wave is an inverted cos wave, right?
>
> You will find all of the details here:
>
> http://www.claysturner.com/dsp/HilbertTransforms.pdf
>

Nice link :):)

Karthik Balaguru

So, the hilbert transform of a sin wave IS an inverted cos wave

Thanks!

>On Feb 26, 1:07=A0pm, "maxplanck" <erik.bo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Please can someone just tell me what the hilbert transform of a sine
wave
>> is?
>
>It is on the first page of the document I gave you a link to.
>
>Clay
>
>

On Feb 26, 1:07&#4294967295;pm, "maxplanck" <erik.bo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Please can someone just tell me what the hilbert transform of a sine wave
> is?

It is on the first page of the document I gave you a link to.

Clay

Please can someone just tell me what the hilbert transform of a sine wave
is?

On Feb 25, 8:18&#4294967295;pm, "maxplanck" <erik.bo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> The Hilbert transform of a sine wave is an inverted cos wave, right?

You will find all of the details here:

http://www.claysturner.com/dsp/HilbertTransforms.pdf


IHTH,

Clay

Al Clark wrote:
> "maxplanck" <erik.bowen@comcast.net> wrote in 
> news:2cWdnWMVW8B29V7anZ2dnUVZ_qCunZ2d@giganews.com:
> 
>> The Hilbert transform of a sine wave is an inverted cos wave, right?
>>
> 
> No.
> 
> sin(wt) is not the same as -cos(wt).

But Al, a Hilbert transform shifts phase 90 degrees. Depending on 
implementation, it can be either way. Maxboard wants to know which way.

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;

Al Clark wrote:
> "maxplanck" <erik.bowen@comcast.net> wrote in 
> news:2cWdnWMVW8B29V7anZ2dnUVZ_qCunZ2d@giganews.com:
> 
>> The Hilbert transform of a sine wave is an inverted cos wave, right?
>>
> 
> No.
> 
> sin(wt) is not the same as -cos(wt).

I would hope that is the case. If they were the same, a Hilbert 
transform would be rather a waste of time, wouldn't it? :-\

Steve

"maxplanck" <erik.bowen@comcast.net> wrote in 
news:2cWdnWMVW8B29V7anZ2dnUVZ_qCunZ2d@giganews.com:

> The Hilbert transform of a sine wave is an inverted cos wave, right?
> 

No.

sin(wt) is not the same as -cos(wt).

Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.