|
Hi, I have been wondering if is it possible to do SHARC and 218X-219x development on the same computer, I mean, VisualDSP++ 1.0 SP1 and VisualDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx on the same hard disk? Any pointer on how to do it is ver, very welcomed. Best regards, |
|
|
VDSP++ for SHARC and 21xx on the same hard disk
Started by ●October 21, 2001
Reply by ●October 22, 20012001-10-22
|
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 18:57:08 -0000, wrote: > I have been wondering if is it possible to do SHARC and 218X-219x > development on the same computer, I mean, VisualDSP++ 1.0 SP1 and > VisualDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx on the same hard disk? I haven't used that combination, but I've used VDSP 1SP1 together with the motor controls development system for the ADMC401. The latter installs the command line tools for the 21xx core into the VDSP directories. |
Reply by ●October 23, 20012001-10-23
|
The motor controls tools don't use the VDSP IDE right now, so
there's no conflict. MCD (at least for the 401) uses a separate debugger. On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:10:24 -0700 (PDT), Jaime Andres Aranguren Cardona wrote: > Hi Kenneth, > Any problems with the IDE? > > Kenneth Porter <> wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 18:57:08 -0000, wrote: > > > I have been wondering if is it possible to do SHARC and 218X-219x > > development on the same computer, I mean, VisualDSP++ 1.0 SP1 and > > VisualDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx on the same hard disk? > > I haven't used that combination, but I've used VDSP 1SP1 together with > the motor controls development system for the ADMC401. The latter > installs the command line tools for the 21xx core into the VDSP > directories. |
Reply by ●October 23, 20012001-10-23
|
Hi, The sharc version of VisualDSP++ will NOT co-exist with the 21xx VisualDSP++. This is what Tech Support told me last march: Chuck, You can install as many different versions as you want, but unfortunately they're just not going to work (and will probably give windows a heart-attack). Our tools weren't designed to co-exist with one another, so the only way you would really be able to get both versions on one machine would be to totally isolate each of them by dual-booting your machine with dual partitions. Of course the sharc VisualDSP++ 2.0 will be able to co-exist with the 21xx stuff. Unfortunately for me, I've got products in the field using VDSP 4.x.x, so I'll never be able to take advantage of that wonderful future co-existence. hope this helps... "Kenneth Porter" <> on 10/22/2001 17:38:59 Please respond to "Kenneth Porter" <> To: "SHARC list" <> cc: "" <> (bcc: Chuck Petras/SEL) Subject: Re: [adsp] VDSP++ for SHARC and 21xx on the same hard disk The motor controls tools don't use the VDSP IDE right now, so there's no conflict. MCD (at least for the 401) uses a separate debugger. On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:10:24 -0700 (PDT), Jaime Andres Aranguren Cardona wrote: > Hi Kenneth, > Any problems with the IDE? > > Kenneth Porter <> wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 18:57:08 -0000, wrote: > > > I have been wondering if is it possible to do SHARC and 218X-219x > > development on the same computer, I mean, VisualDSP++ 1.0 SP1 and > > VisualDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx on the same hard disk? > > I haven't used that combination, but I've used VDSP 1SP1 together with > the motor controls development system for the ADMC401. The latter > installs the command line tools for the 21xx core into the VDSP > directories. _____________________________________ Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. _____________________________________ About this discussion group: To Join: Send an email to To Post: Send an email to To Leave: Send an email to Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adsp Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com/groups.php3 ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
Reply by ●October 23, 20012001-10-23
|
Hi, Actually the current SHARC version of VisualDSP++ (1.0) WILL co-exist with the current version of VisualDSP++ for 21xx (2.0) I have both running on my laptop, installed into the same directory, and are not having any problems. But the older tools of 21xx (6.1, 7.0) will not co-exist with anything that isn't 2.0. Regards, Eirik At 05:52 PM 10/22/2001 -0700, you wrote: >Hi, > >The sharc version of VisualDSP++ will NOT co-exist with the 21xx VisualDSP++. > >This is what Tech Support told me last march: > >Chuck, > You can install as many different versions as you want, but >unfortunately they're just not going to work (and will probably give windows >a heart-attack). Our tools weren't designed to co-exist with one another, >so the only way you would really be able to get both versions on one machine >would be to totally isolate each of them by dual-booting your machine with >dual partitions. > >Of course the sharc VisualDSP++ 2.0 will be able to co-exist with the 21xx >stuff. Unfortunately for me, >I've got products in the field using VDSP 4.x.x, so I'll never be able to take >advantage of that wonderful >future co-existence. > >hope this helps... >"Kenneth Porter" <> on 10/22/2001 17:38:59 > >Please respond to "Kenneth Porter" <> > >To: "SHARC list" <> >cc: "" <> (bcc: >Chuck > Petras/SEL) >Subject: Re: [adsp] VDSP++ for SHARC and 21xx on the same hard disk > >The motor controls tools don't use the VDSP IDE right now, so there's >no conflict. MCD (at least for the 401) uses a separate debugger. > >On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:10:24 -0700 (PDT), Jaime Andres Aranguren >Cardona wrote: > > > Hi Kenneth, > > Any problems with the IDE? > > > > Kenneth Porter <> wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct >2001 18:57:08 -0000, wrote: > > > > > I have been wondering if is it possible to do SHARC and 218X-219x > > > development on the same computer, I mean, VisualDSP++ 1.0 SP1 and > > > VisualDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx on the same hard disk? > > > > I haven't used that combination, but I've used VDSP 1SP1 together with > > the motor controls development system for the ADMC401. The latter > > installs the command line tools for the 21xx core into the VDSP > > directories. > >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author >of this >message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you >want your >answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adsp > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com/groups.php3 >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adsp > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com/groups.php3 >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >_____________________________________________________________________ >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the >MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit >http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp ---- Eirik Jensen FAE DSP/Digital Impact Norway, a part of former Bit Elektronikk Smedsvingen 4, Pobox 194, N-1378 Nesbru, Norway Tel: +47 66776500 Fax: +47 66776501 Dir. line: +47 66776515 ---- |
|
|
Reply by ●October 23, 20012001-10-23
|
Hi, guys. I don't know who should I trust to. I would like Eirik, but certeinly, I don't want to become unuseful my actual installation of VDSP 1.0 for SHARC. So, should I first install VDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx and over it, install VDSP 1.0 SP1 for SHARC? Or viceversa? What about the installation messages that appear standing that the new installation will "upgrade" the actual one? Does it mean it will replace the IDE, compiler, debugger and so on? In such a case, it is abolutely worthless. Best regards, Jaime.
Eirik Jensen <e...@bit.no> wrote: Hi, Jaime Andr Aranguren Cardona
|
Reply by ●October 23, 20012001-10-23
|
Hi, I had the VDSP++ 1.0 already installed, and just installed the ++2.0 over. Actually I have them both running now.... It will not replace the IDE, and the ++2.0 has a "new" IDE called IDDE (they have added a Debug..:), and the compiler, linker, assembler will put itself nicely in together with the SHARC tools. The debugger also will not be touched, as it now is integrated into the IDDE. Of course you can call this an upgrade, as you now also have the new compiler, asm, and linker. ADI does not recommend putting the two tools on the same computer, and that you should wait for the ++2.0 release of the SHARC tools (sometime at the end of the month, I believe). The 2.0 versions of tools (SHARC, 21xx, BlackFIN, TS) are supposed to be able to live happily together. But if you are in a hurry, and need the two tools on the same computer, there isn't much stopping you.... at least in my experience. Regards, Eirik At 07:29 AM 10/23/2001 -0700, Jaime Andres Aranguren Cardona wrote: >Hi, guys. > >I don't know who should I trust to. I would like Eirik, but certeinly, I >don't want to become unuseful my actual installation of VDSP 1.0 for >SHARC. So, should I first install VDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx and over it, install >VDSP 1.0 SP1 for SHARC? Or viceversa? > >What about the installation messages that appear standing that the new >installation will "upgrade" the actual one? Does it mean it will replace >the IDE, compiler, debugger and so on? In such a case, it is abolutely >worthless. > >Best regards, > >Jaime. > > Eirik Jensen <> wrote: >Hi, > >Actually the current SHARC version of VisualDSP++ (1.0) WILL co-exist with >the current version of VisualDSP++ for 21xx (2.0) >I have both running on my laptop, installed into the same directory, and >are not having any problems. >But the older tools of 21xx (6.1, 7.0) will not co-exist with anything that >isn't 2.0. > >Regards, >Eirik > >At 05:52 PM 10/22/2001 -0700, you wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >The sharc version of VisualDSP++ will NOT co-exist with the 21xx > VisualDSP++. > > > >This is what Tech Support told me last march: > > > >Chuck, > > You can install as many different versions as you want, but > >unfortunately they're just not going to work (and will probably give > windows > >a heart-attack). Our tools weren't designed to co-exist with one another, > >so the only way you would really be able to get ! both versions on one > machine > >would be to totally isolate each of them by dual-booting your machine with > >dual partitions. > > > >Of course the sharc VisualDSP++ 2.0 will be able to co-exist with the 21xx > >stuff. Unfortunately for me, > >I've got products in the field using VDSP 4.x.x, so I'll never be able > to take > >advantage of that wonderful > >future co-existence. > > > >hope this helps... > > > > > > > > > > > >"Kenneth Porter" on 10/22/2001 17:38:59 > > > >Please respond to "Kenneth Porter" > > > >To: "SHARC list" > >cc: "" (bcc: > >Chuck > > Petras/SEL) > >Subject: Re: [adsp] VDSP++ for SHARC and 21xx on the same hard disk > > > > > > > >The motor controls tools don't use the VDSP IDE right now, so ther! e's > >no conflict. MCD (at least for the 401) uses a separate debugger. > > > >On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:10:24 -0700 (PDT), Jaime Andres Aranguren > >Cardona wrote: > > > > > Hi Kenneth, > > > Any problems with the IDE? > > > > > > Kenneth Porter wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct > >2001 18:57:08 -0000, wrote: > > > > > > > I have been wondering if is it possible to do SHARC and 218X-219x > > > > development on the same computer, I mean, VisualDSP++ 1.0 SP1 and > > > > VisualDSP++ 2.0 for 21xx on the same hard disk? > > > > > > I haven't used that combination, but I've used VDSP 1SP1 together with > > > the motor controls development system for the ADMC401. The latter > > > installs the command line tools for the 21xx core into the VDSP > > > directories. > > > > > > > >________________________! _____________ > >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author > >of this > >message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you > >want your > >answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > > >_____________________________________ > >About this discussion group: > > > >To Join: Send an email to > > > >To Post: Send an email to > > > >To Leave: Send an email to > > > >Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adsp > > > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com/groups.php3 > > > > > >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_____________________________________ > >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author > >of thi! s message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if > >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > > >_____________________________________ > >About this discussion group: > > > >To Join: Send an email to > > > >To Post: Send an email to > > > >To Leave: Send an email to > > > >Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adsp > > > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com/groups.php3 > > > > > >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ > >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the > >MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit > >http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp > >------! >---------------------------------- >Eirik Jensen FAE DSP/Digital >Impact Norway, a part of former Bit Elektronikk >Smedsvingen 4, Pobox 194, N-1378 Nesbru, Norway >Tel: +47 66776500 Fax: +47 66776501 >Dir. line: +47 66776515 >---- >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adsp > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com/groups.php3 > >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >Jaime Andr Aranguren Cardona ><mailto:@computer.org>jaime.aranguren@ie\ ee.org ><mailto:@computer.org>jaime.aranguren@co\ mputer.org > >_____________________________________________________________________ >This message has been checked for all known viruses by the >MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit >http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp ---- Eirik Jensen FAE DSP/Digital Impact Norway, a part of former Bit Elektronikk Smedsvingen 4, Pobox 194, N-1378 Nesbru, Norway Tel: +47 66776500 Fax: +47 66776501 Dir. line: +47 66776515 ---- |
