DSPRelated.com
Forums

What is the modulation index?

Started by qoo October 19, 2008
I have a confusion here. So please help.

I have a message signal given as :

m(t) = 0.5 cos(wt) + 0.3 sin (2wt)

I also have  a carrier signal whose amplitude is known.

and now i want to calculate the modulation index. which is given as
amplitude of message signal divided by amplitude of carrier. (Remember
that i am doing AM.)

The confusion is that:

Does the amplitude of message signal be 0.5+0.3=0.8  ???
or what else??...I am unable to calculate the amplitude of message
signal which I need to calculate modulation index.

Waiting for your positive reply.
qoo wrote:
> I have a confusion here. So please help. > > I have a message signal given as : > > m(t) = 0.5 cos(wt) + 0.3 sin (2wt) > > I also have a carrier signal whose amplitude is known. > > and now i want to calculate the modulation index. which is given as > amplitude of message signal divided by amplitude of carrier. (Remember > that i am doing AM.) > > The confusion is that: > > Does the amplitude of message signal be 0.5+0.3=0.8 ??? > or what else??...I am unable to calculate the amplitude of message > signal which I need to calculate modulation index. > > Waiting for your positive reply.
Modulation index is a property of an FM signal. The property you want is modulation percentage. Most circumstances that make the modulation percentage useful call for peak values. A quick bit of calculus will reveal the peak value of m(t). You probably should know how to do that. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
On Oct 19, 3:13&#4294967295;pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote:
> qoo wrote: > > I have a confusion here. So please help. > > > I have a message signal given as : > > > m(t) = 0.5 cos(wt) + 0.3 sin (2wt) > > > I also have &#4294967295;a carrier signal whose amplitude is known. > > > and now i want to calculate the modulation index. which is given as > > amplitude of message signal divided by amplitude of carrier. (Remember > > that i am doing AM.) > > > The confusion is that: > > > Does the amplitude of message signal be 0.5+0.3=0.8 &#4294967295;??? > > or what else??...I am unable to calculate the amplitude of message > > signal which I need to calculate modulation index. > > > Waiting for your positive reply. > > Modulation index is a property of an FM signal. The property you want is > modulation percentage. Most circumstances that make the modulation > percentage useful call for peak values. A quick bit of calculus will > reveal the peak value of m(t). You probably should know how to do that. > > Jerry > -- > Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. > &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
Thanks jerry :)
On Oct 19, 3:13&#4294967295;pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote:
> qoo wrote: > > I have a confusion here. So please help. > > > I have a message signal given as : > > > m(t) = 0.5 cos(wt) + 0.3 sin (2wt) > > > I also have &#4294967295;a carrier signal whose amplitude is known. > > > and now i want to calculate the modulation index. which is given as > > amplitude of message signal divided by amplitude of carrier. (Remember > > that i am doing AM.) > > > The confusion is that: > > > Does the amplitude of message signal be 0.5+0.3=0.8 &#4294967295;??? > > or what else??...I am unable to calculate the amplitude of message > > signal which I need to calculate modulation index. > > > Waiting for your positive reply. > > Modulation index is a property of an FM signal. The property you want is > modulation percentage. Most circumstances that make the modulation > percentage useful call for peak values. A quick bit of calculus will > reveal the peak value of m(t). You probably should know how to do that. > > Jerry > -- > Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. > &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
Thanks Jerry :) :) :)
qoo wrote:

   ...

> Thanks Jerry :) :) :)
:) :) :) You're welcome! :) :) :) Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;