DSPRelated.com
Forums

MUSIC and DOA Estimation

Started by junoexpress June 13, 2009
On Jun 15, 4:35 pm, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 14, 6:23 am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote:
...
> > ... If you don't > > believe me, just look around for yourself and try and find > > out how many real-world applications actually use these > > sorts of methods. > > > There aren't too many - I'm not aware of a single one. > > > Rune > > Good to hear: that's what keeps me in business. ;>) > > M
Are there any such systems that have been tested in use by the actual practitioners and remained in use after test? Or are you saying that it is your business to protect practitioners from such systems? Dale B. Dalrymple
On Jun 16, 4:44&#4294967295;pm, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On 16 Jun, 22:22, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 16, 4:32&#4294967295;am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > > > > If you consider this from a math point of view, the basic fact is that > > > > the notion of a "signal subspace" and a "noise subspace" are fiction. > > > > There is a lot about this simple picture that from a mathematical > > > > point of view is not well understood, and probably should be > > > > investigated more. > > > > No, there isn't. The terms are well-defined, the maths simple. > > > As long as one is comfortable with N-dimensional complex-valued > > > vector spaces. But those are just a matter of familiarization, > > > like i = sqrt(-1). A big hurdle for the newbie, second nature > > > to the somewhat more experienced. > > > I doubt it. I'm a PhD in math and I know from my experience that there > > is a fair amount of algebraic geometry involved in understanding array > > manifolds. I've corrected the errors of many engineers who don't > > understand what a complex Steifel manifolds (or even a manifold for > > that matter), let alone its topology, so I know this from experience > > to be the case. > > Still, you don't undrestand the trivial basics of vector spaces. > > > > If your clients hire me to review your system after a > > > failure, I will waste no time in suggest you might be > > > guilty of professional misconduct or fraud, if I find > > > you used MUSIC and only assumed (as opposed to ensured) > > > that the D < P. > > > You have to be very clear what the limitations of your method are. I > > don't know your background, but I don't know any professionals who > > don't spell these type of things out up front. > > You claim to be a professional. You actively disregard > precise and clear warnings about trivial pathologies > of the method you claim to build a business on. > > That's gross professional misconduct at the best of times, > and pretty close to fraud. > > Rune
I've made no "claims", as my standard disclaimer clearly shows: STANDARD DISCLAIMER This product is meant for educational purposes only. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental. This is work in progress and subject to change. Void where prohibited. Some assembly required. List each check separately by bank number. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during shipment. Use only as directed. COUNT YOUR CHANGE. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Postage will be paid by addressee. Subject to regulatory approval. This is not an offer to sell securities. Apply only to affected area. May be too intense for some viewers. Do not stamp. Use other side for additional listings. For recreational use only. Do not disturb. All models over 18 years of age. Not recommended for children. Prerecorded for this time zone. Reproduction strictly prohibited. No solicitors. Shake well before using. No user-serviceable parts inside. For external use only. If condition worsens, discontinue use and consult a physician. Freshest if eaten before date on carton. Subject to change without notice. Times approximate. No substitutions. Simulated picture. Use for the prevention of disease only. No postage necessary if mailed in the United States. Please remain seated until the ride has come to a complete stop. Breaking seal constitutes acceptance of agreement. For off-road use only. As seen on TV. One size fits all. Many suitcases look alike. Contains a substantial amount of non-tobacco ingredients. Colors may, in time, fade. We have sent the forms which seem right for you. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Not affiliated with the American Red Cross. Drop in any mailbox. Edited for television. Keep cool; process promptly. No breakfast after 10 am. Post office will not deliver without postage. List was current at time of printing. Return to sender, no forwarding order on file, unable to forward. Not responsible for direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from any defect, error, or failure to perform. At participating locations only. Not the Beatles. Penalty for private use. See label for sequence. Substantial penalty for early withdrawal. Do not write below this line. Falling rock. Lost ticket pays maximum rate. Your canceled check is your receipt. Add toner. Place stamp here. Avoid contact with skin. Sanitized for your protection. Be sure each item is properly endorsed. Sign here without admitting guilt. Slightly higher west of the Mississippi. Employees and their families are not eligible. Beware of dog. Contestants have been briefed on some questions before the show. You must be present to win. No passes accepted for this engagement. No purchase necessary. Some restrictions apply. Limited time offer, call now to ensure prompt delivery. Celebrity voices impersonated. Processed at location stamped in code at top of carton. Shading within a garment may occur. Use only in a well-ventilated area. Keep away from fire or flames. Replace with same type. Approved for veterans. Keep out of reach of children. Booths for two or more. Check here if tax deductible. Some equipment shown is optional. Price does not include taxes. No Canadian coins. No alcohol, dogs, or horses. No anchovies unless otherwise specified. Restaurant package, not for resale. List at least two alternate dates. First pull up, then pull down. Call toll free number before digging. Take only as directed. Driver does not carry cash. Some of the trademarks mentioned in this product appear for identification purposes only. Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear. Record additional transactions on back of previous stub. Unix is a registered trademark of AT&T. Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate. No transfers issued until the bus comes to a complete stop. Package sold by weight, not volume. This page left intentionally blank. I just work here. Your mileage may vary. These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Use at your own risk. All rights reserved. Close cover before striking. No bills over $20 after dark. Additional charges may apply. Customer voluntarily assumes all risks, known and unknown, of any injury, however caused, even if caused in whole or in part by the action, inaction, or negligence of any party, to the full extent allowed by California law. This supersedes all previous notices. The information contained in this transmission is attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. " OK Rune, it's been a whole lotta fun, but I've had enough cloak and dagger bullshit for a while. Best Regards, M
On Jun 16, 5:49&#4294967295;pm, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 4:35 pm, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 14, 6:23 am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > ... > > > ... &#4294967295; &#4294967295;If you don't > > > believe me, just look around for yourself and try and find > > > out how many real-world applications actually use these > > > sorts of methods. > > > > There aren't too many - I'm not aware of a single one. > > > > Rune > > > Good to hear: that's what keeps me in business. ;>) > > > M > > Are there any such systems that have been tested in use by the actual > practitioners and remained in use after test? Or are you saying that > it is your business to protect practitioners from such systems? > > Dale B. Dalrymple
I don't do "systems" (which is why I am so amused by this thread). I solve math problems that scientists and engineers can't solve. Some of my work has been the basis for entire new fields, some of it has remained a curiosity. But to tell the truth, I could care less either way and I've enjoyed doing both equally well. I do what I do, because I enjoy it, and I enjoy the challenge. Regards, Matt Matt
On Jun 16, 5:27 pm, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 16, 5:49 pm, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 15, 4:35 pm, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 14, 6:23 am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > > ... > > > > ... If you don't > > > > believe me, just look around for yourself and try and find > > > > out how many real-world applications actually use these > > > > sorts of methods. > > > > > There aren't too many - I'm not aware of a single one. > > > > > Rune > > > > Good to hear: that's what keeps me in business. ;>) > > > > M > > > Are there any such systems that have been tested in use by the actual > > practitioners and remained in use after test? Or are you saying that > > it is your business to protect practitioners from such systems? > > > Dale B. Dalrymple > > I don't do "systems" (which is why I am so amused by this thread). I > solve math problems that scientists and engineers can't solve. > > Some of my work has been the basis for entire new fields, some of it > has remained a curiosity. But to tell the truth, I could care less > either way and I've enjoyed doing both equally well. I do what I do, > because I enjoy it, and I enjoy the challenge. > > Regards, > > Matt > > Matt
Ok, so you are a mathematician without applications experience. Dale B. Dalrymple
On Jun 16, 9:33&#4294967295;pm, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Jun 16, 5:27 pm, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, so you are a mathematician without applications experience. > > Dale B. Dalrymple
I develop the theory you apply. ;>)
On 17 Jun, 07:56, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 16, 9:33&#4294967295;pm, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 16, 5:27 pm, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok, so you are a mathematician without applications experience. > > > Dale B. Dalrymple > > I develop the theory you apply. &#4294967295; ;>)
You might think so, but the fact of the matter is that you don't understand the theory that has been standard in the DSP community for 35 years (It is common to trace MUSIC-type methods to Pisarenko's 1973 paper.) Not only have this theory been around for decades, it is so simple that it can be explained to a reasonably bright 12-year-old without much difficulty, using only a piece of paper and a couple of sticks. Rune
On 17 Jun, 00:35, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 16, 4:44&#4294967295;pm, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > > > > > > > On 16 Jun, 22:22, Junoexpress <MTBrenne...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 16, 4:32&#4294967295;am, Rune Allnor <all...@tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > > > > > If you consider this from a math point of view, the basic fact is that > > > > > the notion of a "signal subspace" and a "noise subspace" are fiction. > > > > > There is a lot about this simple picture that from a mathematical > > > > > point of view is not well understood, and probably should be > > > > > investigated more. > > > > > No, there isn't. The terms are well-defined, the maths simple. > > > > As long as one is comfortable with N-dimensional complex-valued > > > > vector spaces. But those are just a matter of familiarization, > > > > like i = sqrt(-1). A big hurdle for the newbie, second nature > > > > to the somewhat more experienced. > > > > I doubt it. I'm a PhD in math and I know from my experience that there > > > is a fair amount of algebraic geometry involved in understanding array > > > manifolds. I've corrected the errors of many engineers who don't > > > understand what a complex Steifel manifolds (or even a manifold for > > > that matter), let alone its topology, so I know this from experience > > > to be the case. > > > Still, you don't undrestand the trivial basics of vector spaces. > > > > > If your clients hire me to review your system after a > > > > failure, I will waste no time in suggest you might be > > > > guilty of professional misconduct or fraud, if I find > > > > you used MUSIC and only assumed (as opposed to ensured) > > > > that the D < P. > > > > You have to be very clear what the limitations of your method are. I > > > don't know your background, but I don't know any professionals who > > > don't spell these type of things out up front. > > > You claim to be a professional. You actively disregard > > precise and clear warnings about trivial pathologies > > of the method you claim to build a business on. > > > That's gross professional misconduct at the best of times, > > and pretty close to fraud. > > > Rune > > I've made no "claims", as my standard disclaimer clearly shows: > > STANDARD DISCLAIMER
You might want to be very careful about how you apporach the business side of your activities. Legal details probably differ from location to location, but at least in my neck of the woods, you approach 'fraud' in the legal sense when 1) Money change hands. 2) There is a certain discrepancy between what the user/buyer *thinks* he gets and what he *actually* gets. There are also quite strict damage compensation clauses, where the manufacturer (or a representative, such as importer or retail outlet) of a product is held legally responsible for damages that are caused by the product. Do note that this has nothing to do with unsafe or uncorrect use of a product: The manufacurer or his representative is held responsible for damages, no matter what. A disclaimer doesn't change any of this, as local banks are in the process of finding out. Over the past few years they sold 'financial products' to customers, where the customers took up loans, at some interest rate, and placed the money in the market, at some other interst rate. Details in the press are a bit vague as to exactly what was sold, but problems arose when interest rates on the loans exceeded profits from the market. Lots of people lost hundreds of thousands of dollars on this, and sued the banks. There are several legal processes at work over these questions right now, so the end result remains to be seen. However, you might want to note that - The banks issue standard disclaimers no matter what product they sell their customers - The product in question was based on the *assumption* that the financial market would not collapse - The courts hold product brokers responsible for informing the users 'sufficiently well' about the products, their benefits, and particularly the risks. Again, the Norwegian legal system probably differs in the details from systems in other coutries. The main principles should be the same, throughout the western world. Rune