> In article<9vwXm.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> Eric Jacobsen<email@example.com> wrote:
> " Maintaining synchronization down in that mud is a whole 'nuther
> " issue, and satellite transponder bandwidth is expensive enough that
> " it's very rare to see codes lower than R = 1/2.
> Not everyone has to have lower codes at the same time; priority and
> conditions. Conditions can be automated; priority obviously has
> administration overhead that is untrivial but could be done. Start
> with conditions and see if excellent priority administration is still
> needed (beyond some rudimentary defaults).
It sounds to me like you're confusing link budget and QoS.
Minister of Algorithms