And email me. I dimly recall that someone suggested a software PLL paper, and that you were getting shoved forward as a co-author (or even volunteering). At any rate, I'm going to see if I have time to start on this; if you're interested in working with me on this let me know. tim at wescottdesign dot com (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). -- www.wescottdesign.com
Would Eric Jacobsen Please Pick Up a White Courtesy Telephone
Started by ●February 12, 2010
Reply by ●February 14, 20102010-02-14
On Feb 13, 1:50�pm, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com> wrote:> And email me. �I dimly recall that someone suggested a software PLL > paper, and that you were getting shoved forward as a co-author (or even > volunteering). > > At any rate, I'm going to see if I have time to start on this; if you're > interested in working with me on this let me know. > > tim at wescottdesign dot com > > (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). > > --www.wescottdesign.comBeen done....to death!
Reply by ●February 14, 20102010-02-14
On 13 Feb, 01:50, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com> wrote:> tim at wescottdesign dot com > > (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed).n | One might attempt a rephrasing: a | m | name with someplace point domain. e | @ | Ought to be decodeable by humans. s | o | Another possibility is to write top - down m | in the margin, as I attempted at the side here. e | Just make sure to have phrased and spell-checked l | the post first - if you need to edit any substantial a | amount of editing after having included the margin c | text, as I did with this post, there is a *lot* more work! e | . | Rune d | o | m |
Reply by ●February 14, 20102010-02-14
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:17:11 -0800, HardySpicer wrote:> On Feb 13, 1:50 pm, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com> wrote: >> And email me. I dimly recall that someone suggested a software PLL >> paper, and that you were getting shoved forward as a co-author (or even >> volunteering). >> >> At any rate, I'm going to see if I have time to start on this; if >> you're interested in working with me on this let me know. >> >> tim at wescottdesign dot com >> >> (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). >> >> --www.wescottdesign.com > > Been done....to death!References? I don't recall seeing articles, and the folks that mentioned it in the thread in which the mention is buried obviously hadn't either. I'll be doing a literature search at the local Uni library -- even if it's been published academically, there's always room for a new tutorial, as long as it has my name on it. -- www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●February 14, 20102010-02-14
Tim Wescott wrote:>>>I dimly recall that someone suggested a software PLL >>>paper, > I'll be doing a literature search at the local Uni library -- even if > it's been published academically, there's always room for a new tutorial, > as long as it has my name on it.It is no big deal to build an analog of continuous time PLL in the software. However, one of the good things about software PLL is that you can implement optimal control algorithm in the loop instead of classic linear filter. Once I tried to do that; and it worked just wondeful; since then I became the staunch supporter of the modern control theory. Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant http://www.abvolt.com
Reply by ●February 15, 20102010-02-15
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:00:15 -0600, Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:> Tim Wescott wrote: > >>>>I dimly recall that someone suggested a software PLL paper, >> I'll be doing a literature search at the local Uni library -- even if >> it's been published academically, there's always room for a new >> tutorial, as long as it has my name on it. > > It is no big deal to build an analog of continuous time PLL in the > software. However, one of the good things about software PLL is that you > can implement optimal control algorithm in the loop instead of classic > linear filter. Once I tried to do that; and it worked just wondeful; > since then I became the staunch supporter of the modern control theory. >It's certainly one place where the plant behavior stays predictable enough to have optimal control techniques do well. -- www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●February 15, 20102010-02-15
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:29:06 -0800 (PST) Rune Allnor <allnor@tele.ntnu.no> wrote:> On 13 Feb, 01:50, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com> wrote: > > > tim at wescottdesign dot com > > > > (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). > > n | One might attempt a rephrasing: > a | > m | name with someplace point domain. > e | > @ | Ought to be decodeable by humans. > s | > o | Another possibility is to write top - down > m | in the margin, as I attempted at the side here. > e | Just make sure to have phrased and spell-checked > l | the post first - if you need to edit any substantial > a | amount of editing after having included the margin > c | text, as I did with this post, there is a *lot* more work! > e | > . | Rune > d | > o | > m |Weak puns always help as well. -- Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology Email address is currently out of order
Reply by ●February 15, 20102010-02-15
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:29:06 -0800, Rune Allnor wrote:> On 13 Feb, 01:50, Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com> wrote: > >> tim at wescottdesign dot com >> >> (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). > > n | One might attempt a rephrasing: > a | > m | name with someplace point domain. e | > @ | Ought to be decodeable by humans. s | > o | Another possibility is to write top - down m | in the margin, as I > attempted at the side here. e | Just make sure to have phrased and > spell-checked l | the post first - if you need to edit any substantial a > | amount of editing after having included the margin c | text, as I did > with this post, there is a *lot* more work! e | > . | Rune > d | > o | > m |Unless it's confounded by the other guy's newsgroup reader (you _did_ put in line feeds on your side, yes?) -- www.wescottdesign.com
