On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Re: The inherent periodicity of the Discrete Fourier Transform
Started by ●February 6, 2011
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
Reply by ●February 6, 20112011-02-06
On Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Jacobsen wrote: ...> I personally find more merit in the windowed point of view for most > applications. It has served me very well for a very long time.Eric, I see three positions in this thread. A. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, and must always be accounted for. (r.b-j.) B. Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT, but can often be ignored. (You) C. . Periodic extension is inherent in the DFT under some circumstances but not others. (Nonsense) Did I leave anything out? Jerry
