if i have a new idea and the result of it so any one know the procedure of publishing IEEE paper
IEE papers
Started by ●February 15, 2011
Reply by ●February 15, 20112011-02-15
There are many IEEE publications. When you find one that you feel is most appropriate, try to contact its editor. It would be best if you had a brief summary to show him/her. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
Reply by ●February 15, 20112011-02-15
On Feb 14, 11:05�pm, sami <jehan...@yahoo.com> wrote:> �if i have a � new idea and the result of it so any one know the > procedure of publishing �IEEE paperIf you want to know how to publish a paper for the IEEE, where would be the first place to look? The IEEE web site has complete information for publishing papers, including all the templates needed.
Reply by ●February 15, 20112011-02-15
> > if i have a new idea and the result of it so any one know the >procedure of publishing IEEE paper >1. choose journal: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/periodicals.jsp?psf_t=&psf_isieee=1&psf_isiet=0&psf_isaip=0&psf_isibm=0&psf_istandj=1&psf_ismag=0&psf_isltr=1&psf_rpp=10&psf_isatv=1&psf_rngmin=null&psf_rngmax=null&psf_pn=1&psf_scid=&psf_scn=&psf_tarid=&psf_tarn= e.g Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=78 2. write paper 3. submit , usually through online system. If this is your first paper it will be probably rejected. So I would consider selecting other journal (not IEEE transactions or magazine) B.R. P.
Reply by ●February 15, 20112011-02-15
On Feb 15, 12:05�am, sami <jehan...@yahoo.com> wrote:> �if i have a � new idea and the result of it so any one know the > procedure of publishing �IEEE paper1) Find IEEE journal of interest to you or IEEE conference 2) Write your paper with all the nice figures and stuff 3) Develop a working software demo in e.g. Matlab, put it on your website so reviewers can download it and try it out (they won't) 4) Submit your paper via online submission system 5) Wait a few weeks (months ?) 6) Get an official rejection from IEEE journal or conference accompanied by some unbelievably stupid reviewer's comments (Did they read YOUR paper or someone else's paper ???) Rinse, repeat.... If you are really lucky, you migth catch a break after 3-4-5...10...100 cycles (depends on your luck...)
Reply by ●February 15, 20112011-02-15
On 2/14/2011 9:05 PM, sami wrote:> > if i have a new idea and the result of it so any one know the > procedure of publishing IEEE paperThe journals themselves generally give the rules for publishing as I recall. If not, then look on the web. Do understand that they will be looking for something "original" so if you really have a new idea then it shouldn't be too difficult as long as you can write in a reasonable style. Yet, there is a "community" and if you're way off base re: the community then the likelihood of publication is lower. You might tie up with someone who is known in the community - that could help you in a number of ways including preparing the paper as you'd have a built-in editor who knows the ropes. Just offer to give equal credit. That's also a good way to get *referenced* in the future. If nobody wants to partner with you then question the idea. Maybe someone will be frank enough to tell you why the idea itself isn't likely to be published. But, if you've done the research and know that it's a new idea then you're already well on your way. Good luck with it!! Fred
Reply by ●February 15, 20112011-02-15
On Feb 15, 1:56�pm, Fred Marshall <fmarshallxremove_th...@acm.org> wrote:> On 2/14/2011 9:05 PM, sami wrote: > > > > > � if i have a � new idea and the result of it so any one know the > > procedure of publishing �IEEE paper > > The journals themselves generally give the rules for publishing as I > recall. �If not, then look on the web. > > Do understand that they will be looking for something "original" so if > you really have a new idea then it shouldn't be too difficult as long as > you can write in a reasonable style. > > Yet, there is a "community" and if you're way off base re: the community > then the likelihood of publication is lower. �You might tie up with > someone who is known in the community - that could help you in a number > of ways including preparing the paper as you'd have a built-in editor > who knows the ropes. �Just offer to give equal credit. �That's also a > good way to get *referenced* in the future. > > If nobody wants to partner with you then question the idea. �Maybe > someone will be frank enough to tell you why the idea itself isn't > likely to be published. �But, if you've done the research and know that > it's a new idea then you're already well on your way. > > Good luck with it!! > > Fred@ the OP In addition to the other good and important advice already given by others, remember to proof-read your work thoroughly before submission to eliminate typographical errors, and be sure that you also use the electronic submission process with the utmost care. For example, if you wish to publish a paper in an IEEE journal or conference, format it in the style they demand, and submit it to that journal's (or conference's) web site. DO NOT submit your paper to an IEE journal site instead (cf. the subject used by the OP for this thread). The IEEE is not the same as the IEE....
Reply by ●February 16, 20112011-02-16
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:05:48 -0800 (PST), sami <jehanfit@yahoo.com> wrote:> > if i have a new idea and the result of it so any one know the >procedure of publishing IEEE paperHello sami, I might be able to offer you some advice. Why don't you tell us about your idea. (Don't assume we can read your mind, give details.) And when you describe your idea, please don't use that darned "texting gibberish lingo" that you used in your post here. Use proper English grammar, proper spelling, proper punctuation, proper capitalization. If you're too lazy to descibe your idea with proper writing, we'll be too lazy to give you advice. It's up to you now. [-Rick-]
Reply by ●February 16, 20112011-02-16
On Feb 15, 1:47�pm, fatalist <simfid...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 15, 12:05�am, sami <jehan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > �if i have a � new idea and the result of it so any one know the > > procedure of publishing �IEEE paper > > 1) Find IEEE journal of interest to you or IEEE conference > > 2) Write your paper with all the nice figures and stuff > > 3) Develop a working software demo in e.g. Matlab, put it on your > website so reviewers can download it and try it out (they won't) > > 4) Submit your paper via online submission system > > 5) Wait a few weeks (months ?) > > 6) Get an official rejection from IEEE journal or conference > accompanied by some unbelievably stupid reviewer's comments (Did they > read YOUR paper or someone else's paper ???) > > Rinse, repeat.... > > If you are really lucky, you migth catch a break after > 3-4-5...10...100 cycles (depends on your luck...)Just place your final PDF paper on arxiv.org and show so-called "community" a middle finger That's what Perelman did with his seminal proof and he was absolutely right Forget IEEE and other similar "non-profit" outfits - they exist solely to collect your money to support a few officials
Reply by ●February 16, 20112011-02-16
But Grisha is something of a nut. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/23/grigory-perelman-rejects-1m-dollars Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
