DSPRelated.com
Forums

A Few FFTs Short of MPC

Started by Bret Cahill April 15, 2012
On 4/15/2012 8:55 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:

Suddenly I'm seeing:

Subject: ...

First they were postings by Bret.
But now by r b-j ??????

Fred

On 4/16/2012 8:34 AM, Fred Marshall wrote:
> On 4/15/2012 8:55 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote: > > Suddenly I'm seeing: > > Subject: ... > > First they were postings by Bret. > But now by r b-j ?????? > > Fred >
er.... I should have said "Brent"
On 4/16/12 11:32 AM, Fred Marshall wrote:
> On 4/15/2012 8:25 PM, Jerry Avins wrote: >> On 4/15/2012 11:20 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> Mathematicians, however, aren't satisfied with "well it woOOorks" >>> jerry rigs. >> >> I resent that. The word is "jury rig". >> >> ... >> > > You are older than that! You reference the more recent usage. I'd never > even heard "jury rig" in this context before.
really? say, it's the Apollo 13 mission, and they need to get some more juice to restart the Orbiter than the batteries in the Orbiter have to give. what to do, what to do? i wouldn't have expected they had the spare cables lying around (since every gram of weight is accounted for), but they were able to hook up the power supply of the LEM to the Orbiter with cables that went right through the hatch so that they had the extra one or two amps needed to restart all of the electronics in the Orbiter that were necessarily shut down (since they lost their fuel cells in the explosion). i cannot think of another term for that. what would be a better term?
> Not to be confused with "rigged jury".
as in Bush v. Gore, December 12th, 2000 ? -- r b-j rbj@audioimagination.com "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
On 4/16/2012 8:47 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> really? say, it's the Apollo 13 mission,
Sorry Robert. I was using shorthand for Jerry Avins benefit. In my language the term is jerry-rigged. That's what I meant. I suppose it could now take on a new meaning and we could call it Jerry-rigged (referring to Avins) because I'll bet he has some kind of record doing this sort of thing .. a very clever guy. Fred
On 4/16/12 11:35 AM, Fred Marshall wrote:
> On 4/16/2012 8:34 AM, Fred Marshall wrote: >> On 4/15/2012 8:55 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote: >> >> Suddenly I'm seeing: >> >> Subject: ... >> >> First they were postings by Bret. >> But now by r b-j ?????? >> >> Fred >> > > er.... I should have said "Brent"
it was Brent's idea, and it makes a bigger difference if you're viewing the thread in Google Groups. i did adopt it. but i'm sorta hypocritical, since i was advocating starving the troll. Fred, there was something else you said in another thread that i was gonna respond to, but i didn't have time at the moment and now i can't find it. might you know what it was? -- r b-j rbj@audioimagination.com "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
On 4/16/2012 1:29 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> Fred, there was something else you said in another thread that i was > gonna respond to, but i didn't have time at the moment and now i can't > find it. might you know what it was?
Wow. What a question!! Implying that I would know what you were thinking at some time in the past..... THE OBVIOUSLY OMNISCIENT ONE RESPONDS: jerry-rigged :-)
On 4/15/2012 11:55 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> On 4/15/12 11:28 PM, Eric Jacobsen wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:25:37 -0400, Jerry Avins<jya@ieee.org> wrote: >> >>> On 4/15/2012 11:20 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> Mathematicians, however, aren't satisfied with "well it woOOorks" >>>> jerry rigs. >>> >>> I resent that. The word is "jury rig". > > who knows what this person meant? the word could be anything. > > now someone named Jury Avins is gonna resent it. > > there's always someone who'll resent some term. > > at the expense of offending threaded parts, i now say "we got screwed". > when i was a kid, the word was "gypped" or even "jewed". i can't imagine > anyone would take offense at that. > >>> ... >>> >>> Jerry >> >> Dangit. After the story about doing the field weld with an in-place >> car battery and multiple pairs of sunglasses I was pretty certain it >> was named after you. ;)
"Jerry built", a disparagement dating from WWI. "Jury rig" A temporary repair, often to a mast, at sea.
> plausible. but i never heard the story about arc-welding using a car > battery. i'd like to hear that.
Lay the bell crank on one battery terminal, and weld it with a piece of hangar wire held in the clamp of a jumper cable wrapped a few times through the center hole in the spare tire. The inductance gives the arc a smidgeon of stability.
> i can only tell the story of a -35 F January day in Grand Forks North > Dakota in the 70s (during a 2 week period that never got in the + > territory) and (since lead-acid batteries do better if they get a little > warmer than -35F) a method i used to use the batteries own stored energy > to warm it up so this dumb car would start. i guess i just told it.
A pair of slip-joint pliers is an ideal tool for doing that. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
On 4/16/2012 12:15 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>> Mathematicians, however, aren't satisfied with "well it woOOorks" >>> jerry rigs. >> >> I resent that. The word is "jury rig". >> >> ... >> >> Jerry > > http://jerryrig.com/
So? Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
On 4/16/2012 5:08 AM, Androcles wrote:
> "Jerry Avins"<jya@ieee.org> wrote in message > news:IiMir.1281$M37.859@newsfe01.iad... >> On 4/15/2012 11:20 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> Mathematicians, however, aren't satisfied with "well it woOOorks" >>> jerry rigs. >> >> I resent that. The word is "jury rig". >> >> ... >> >> Jerry > > As a lurker trying to decide who is correct I see myself as > a juror. I have not been rigged, it seems more like a jerry > rig to me.
It takes a long time for a frequent error to become accepted as correct: Aks me no questions and I'll tell you no lies. That's the nuculus of the problem. Irregardless? Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
> >>> Mathematicians, however, aren't satisfied with "well it woOOorks" > >>> jerry rigs. > > >> I resent that. The word is "jury rig". > > >> &#4294967295; &#4294967295;... > > >> Jerry > > > As a lurker trying to decide who is correct I see myself as > > a juror. I have not been rigged, it seems more like a jerry > > rig to me. > > It takes a long time for a frequent error to become accepted as correct
"A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason." -- Thomas Paine (1776) Still, tumults are rare in math and there isn't much of one here either. Everyone with a Ph.D. in math has already or will soon readily admit that "matched filtering" isn't the best term. North would have been better off just calling it a "partial matched filter" or just the "North filter." Now we are stuck with calling the deconvolution of a matched filter output "the pure match filter" or the "complete match filter" or "matching only" filter. Bret Cahill "All is number." "The name giver . . ." -- some ancient Greeks