Hi everyone, I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is what I am trying to do: I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain probability that it belongs to a certain type. I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would like to have some good references with me. Thanks, Nish
Feature extraction
Started by ●September 28, 2004
Reply by ●September 28, 20042004-09-28
"Pankaj Daga" <pankajdaga@excite.com> wrote in message news:1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com...> Hi everyone, > > I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is > what I am trying to do: > > I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > probability that it belongs to a certain type. > > I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. > > What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference > or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature > extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one > would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that > is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not > have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would > like to have some good references with me.Nish, I don't know of any approach that doesn't require learning - be it machine learning or programmer learning. If you're going to use feature analysis then you have to identify the "features" first and extract them from the signatures. That's difficult to do. If you use a neural net driven by short-term spectral analysis that might be better - then train on collision types. I don't know how you use genetic learning in this case but maybe that would work. I'm unclear on the system implementation you might have in mind. I guess you'd tweak the classifier coefficients using the genetic algorithm until you get the best results? But, what is the "classifier" and what are the "coefficients"? You may want to rethink the problem. There is a huge variety of vehicle structures. These structures are the acoustic generators. So, what hope is there of differentiating crash *type* from vehicle types? Ditto speeds. So, I envision a multidimensional space of automobile make, model and year, and vehicle speed and direction. It seems to me naive to attempt to classify a crash sound as "rear end collision", "headon collision", "front to side collision" because these geometries may not be the driving factor in determining the acoustic signatures. If the situation isn't more limited than I've described then I'd be very skeptical. Fred
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
pankajdaga@excite.com (Pankaj Daga) wrote in message news:<1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com>...> Hi everyone, > > I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is > what I am trying to do: > > I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > probability that it belongs to a certain type.This would probably amount to use some sort of signal characteristica, and feed them into some sort of classifyer, right?> I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem.Most classifiers I know of, tend to classify signals in terms of what they already know. It would be very interesting to learn of a classifier that actually gets able to classify a feature as "this is new, I've never encounetered this before". Make sure you post here if you find a way of doing that.> What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference > or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature > extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one > would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that > is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not > have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would > like to have some good references with me.I like that! Buying non-curricular books from your own money (as opposed to project money) indicates a certain enthusiasm for the subject. And yes, I completely agree with you in getting the good books first. I've been buying 'unnecessary' books for the last 15 years, and now I have some 10 to 12 shelf-meters with books, reports and journals. I think there's somwhere on the order of 130 - 150 volumes of books now (I have never had the guts to actually add up how much money I've spent...), and almost everybody who visit me in my office find some book they recognize from their own fields. Rune
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
In article <f56893ae.0409282153.359a246d@posting.google.com>, Rune Allnor <allnor@tele.ntnu.no> wrote:>pankajdaga@excite.com (Pankaj Daga) wrote in message news:<1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com>... >> I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. >> What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on >> these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. >> Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain >> probability that it belongs to a certain type. > >This would probably amount to use some sort of signal characteristica, >and feed them into some sort of classifyer, right? > >> I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would >> be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps >> (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem.Multi-layer perceptrons or SVMs may also be worth checking out. You may find the Torch library (http://www.torch.ch/) useful. It implements several different classification and clustering techniques.>Most classifiers I know of, tend to classify signals in terms of what >they already know. It would be very interesting to learn of a classifier >that actually gets able to classify a feature as "this is new, I've >never encounetered this before". Make sure you post here if you find >a way of doing that.When Pankaj Daga wrote "identify a new crash", I think he meant a crash that was not present in the classifier training data, but belongs to one of the types that were present in the training data. However, the problem Rune described of having a classifier says "this is new, I've never encountered this before" (in other words, an unseen type) is also very interesting. One term for this is "novelty detection" (try that on Google -- and judging just from the title, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/658958.html seems like a useful hit). I guess the idea is to have the classifier report when a feature vector is different from the feature vectors typically seen in training. For example, you could estimate a probability distribution (such as a mixture of Gaussians) for feature vectors using the training data. Then, given a fresh feature vector, calculate its probability according to that distribution, and if the probability is low then say "this is new".
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
Hi Fred, I do not have acousic data but acceleration and pressure signals from the sensors. Nish "Fred Marshall" <fmarshallx@remove_the_x.acm.org> wrote in message news:<c-qdnWJcdoMwJcTcRVn-iA@centurytel.net>...> "Pankaj Daga" <pankajdaga@excite.com> wrote in message > news:1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com... > > Hi everyone, > > > > I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is > > what I am trying to do: > > > > I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > > What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > > these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > > Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > > probability that it belongs to a certain type. > > > > I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > > be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > > (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. > > > > What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference > > or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature > > extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one > > would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that > > is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not > > have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would > > like to have some good references with me. > > Nish, > > I don't know of any approach that doesn't require learning - be it machine > learning or programmer learning. > > If you're going to use feature analysis then you have to identify the > "features" first and extract them from the signatures. That's difficult to > do. > > If you use a neural net driven by short-term spectral analysis that might be > better - then train on collision types. > > I don't know how you use genetic learning in this case but maybe that would > work. I'm unclear on the system implementation you might have in mind. I > guess you'd tweak the classifier coefficients using the genetic algorithm > until you get the best results? But, what is the "classifier" and what are > the "coefficients"? > > You may want to rethink the problem. There is a huge variety of vehicle > structures. These structures are the acoustic generators. So, what hope is > there of differentiating crash *type* from vehicle types? Ditto speeds. > So, I envision a multidimensional space of automobile make, model and year, > and vehicle speed and direction. It seems to me naive to attempt to > classify a crash sound as "rear end collision", "headon collision", "front > to side collision" because these geometries may not be the driving factor in > determining the acoustic signatures. If the situation isn't more limited > than I've described then I'd be very skeptical. > > Fred
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
pankajdaga@excite.com (Pankaj Daga) wrote in message news:<1a4b2aef.0409282307.228ec26e@posting.google.com>...> Hi Fred, > > I do not have acousic data but acceleration and pressure signals from the sensors. > > NishOK... this makes me think of crash tests, with crash test dummies and the whole package. If so, you would know what cars are involved, where the cars are hit and what object hits the car (or vice versa). What could the 'features' you are looking for be, then... I speculate further, along the lines that you might be interested in identifying the 'bumps' and 'thumps' of, say, the bumber hitting the forward panel of the car body, the panel hitting the radiator, the radiator hitting the engine block, etc. Could it be that what you really want, is some black box that can take the seismo-acoustic signature as input and tell you the chain of events when all those objects smash into each other, at output...? If I'm right in my speculations about your application, I wouldn't be too optimistic. I have yet to see any piece of data that comes with 'tags' of the sorts I suspect you are after. In the applications I know of, it's a task for a human operator (and a difficult one, at that) to sort out such questions. Rune
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
In response to Rune's request for information regarding classifiers that detect the presence of data that has not been encountered previously by the system; this is type of classifier is referred to as a novelty detector. See link below. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/658958.html Luca "Pankaj Daga" <pankajdaga@excite.com> wrote in message news:1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com...> Hi everyone, > > I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is > what I am trying to do: > > I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > probability that it belongs to a certain type. > > I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. > > What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference > or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature > extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one > would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that > is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not > have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would > like to have some good references with me. > > Thanks, > > Nish
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
Hi Rune, As David pointed in the thread below, I am mostly interested ina new signal being classified according to the knowledge existing in the system. However, classification of totally novel signals would also be very interesting. I have a lot of enthusiasm! However, the topic can get so overwhelming, it is difficult to know where to start. Best, Nish allnor@tele.ntnu.no (Rune Allnor) wrote in message news:<f56893ae.0409282153.359a246d@posting.google.com>...> pankajdaga@excite.com (Pankaj Daga) wrote in message news:<1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com>... > > Hi everyone, > > > > I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is > > what I am trying to do: > > > > I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > > What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > > these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > > Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > > probability that it belongs to a certain type. > > This would probably amount to use some sort of signal characteristica, > and feed them into some sort of classifyer, right? > > > I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > > be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > > (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. > > Most classifiers I know of, tend to classify signals in terms of what > they already know. It would be very interesting to learn of a classifier > that actually gets able to classify a feature as "this is new, I've > never encounetered this before". Make sure you post here if you find > a way of doing that. > > > What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference > > or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature > > extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one > > would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that > > is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not > > have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would > > like to have some good references with me. > > I like that! Buying non-curricular books from your own money (as opposed > to project money) indicates a certain enthusiasm for the subject. And yes, > I completely agree with you in getting the good books first. I've been > buying 'unnecessary' books for the last 15 years, and now I have some 10 > to 12 shelf-meters with books, reports and journals. I think there's > somwhere on the order of 130 - 150 volumes of books now (I have never > had the guts to actually add up how much money I've spent...), and > almost everybody who visit me in my office find some book they recognize > from their own fields. > > Rune
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
Thanks David! I will check out the torch library. Best, Nish gelbart@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (David Gelbart) wrote in message news:<cjdju0$1c56$1@agate.berkeley.edu>...> In article <f56893ae.0409282153.359a246d@posting.google.com>, > Rune Allnor <allnor@tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > >pankajdaga@excite.com (Pankaj Daga) wrote in message news:<1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com>... > >> I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > >> What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > >> these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > >> Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > >> probability that it belongs to a certain type. > > > >This would probably amount to use some sort of signal characteristica, > >and feed them into some sort of classifyer, right? > > > >> I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > >> be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > >> (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. > > Multi-layer perceptrons or SVMs may also be worth checking out. > You may find the Torch library (http://www.torch.ch/) useful. It > implements several different classification and clustering techniques. > > >Most classifiers I know of, tend to classify signals in terms of what > >they already know. It would be very interesting to learn of a classifier > >that actually gets able to classify a feature as "this is new, I've > >never encounetered this before". Make sure you post here if you find > >a way of doing that. > > When Pankaj Daga wrote "identify a new crash", I think he meant a crash > that was not present in the classifier training data, but belongs to one > of the types that were present in the training data. > > However, the problem Rune described of having a classifier says > "this is new, I've never encountered this before" (in other words, > an unseen type) is also very interesting. One term for this > is "novelty detection" (try that on Google -- and judging just from > the title, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/658958.html seems like a useful > hit). I guess the idea is to have the classifier report when a feature > vector is different from the feature vectors typically seen in training. > For example, you could estimate a probability distribution (such as a > mixture of Gaussians) for feature vectors using the training data. Then, > given a fresh feature vector, calculate its probability according to that > distribution, and if the probability is low then say "this is new".
Reply by ●September 29, 20042004-09-29
Hi Luca, This adds another interesting dimension to the problem. Thanks, Nish "Luca Notini" <L.notini@lboro.ac.uk> wrote in message news:<cjefu7$r5m$1@sun-cc204.lut.ac.uk>...> In response to Rune's request for information regarding classifiers that > detect the presence of data that has not been encountered previously by the > system; this is type of classifier is referred to as a novelty detector. See > link below. > > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/658958.html > > > Luca > > "Pankaj Daga" <pankajdaga@excite.com> wrote in message > news:1a4b2aef.0409280835.2555e108@posting.google.com... > > Hi everyone, > > > > I need some advise regarding a college project that I have. Here is > > what I am trying to do: > > > > I have a bunch of automobile crash signals of various collision types. > > What I would like to do is do some sort of a feature analysis based on > > these signals and classify each kind of crash based on these features. > > Ultimately, I want the system to identify a new crash with a certain > > probability that it belongs to a certain type. > > > > I was thinking also that some kind of genetic learning algorithm would > > be nice for such a system. Someone even mentioned self organizing maps > > (SOM) as a good tool for tackling such a problem. > > > > What I would like to know is if someone can recommend some reference > > or books that deals with techniques for such kind of feature > > extraction. There are a lot of books, but I do not know which one > > would be useful for me. They also tend to be a bit expensive and that > > is why I need to choose them carefully on my student budget. I do not > > have much experience with such kind of adaptive algorithms and I would > > like to have some good references with me. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nish






