On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:00:45 GMT, eric.jacobsen@ieee.org (Eric Jacobsen) wrote:>On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:03:12 -0700 (PDT), Mauritz Jameson ><mjames2393@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>If all you need is a low-pass filter, why do you need Faust and why are >>>you looking at code for it that appears to implement an all-pass filter? >> >>Are you serious? > >It's a serious question that would help anyone who really wants to >help you to do so. If you're serious about getting help, you might >consider that. > >>It you bother to respond to my posts, and you're able to provide some insight, why not help a fellow DSP guy instead of wasting time on detours with irrelevant questions. > >If you really want some help from people who can help you, don't waste >their time with attitude and irrelevant information. Answer their >questions so that they can help you. > >Assuming you're serious about getting help. > >>I really don't get the attitude in this newsgroup. If somebody asked a DSP question and I was able to help, I would provide that help regardless of whether or not the posed question had to do with homework, personal interest or professional work. > >I really don't get the attitude of people who complain about the >people trying to help them in this newsgroup. They ask a DSP >question in a way that makes it difficult to answer the question in a >useful way or makes it unclear what they're really asking, and they >expect others to read their mind and drop all of their own homework, >personal interests, or professional obligations on their behalf. > >So far your behavior appears to be seeking spoonfeeding, which >generally doesn't go over well here since dsp is a pretty deep topic >with a lot of nuances. If you appear unwilling to do the background >work, then the likelihood of any provided help actually doing any good >is low, so many who could help don't bother or keep asking questions >until > >a) the OP clarifies the question in a way that people can provide >useful answers > >and/or b) it becomes clear whether the OP can actually put any >provided help to productive use. > >I think some people are still evaluating a and b in this case. > >>And a link to the Faust tutorial? Really? Been there - done that. > >Then focus your questions to what you don't yet understand. You >asked several times for help with "Faust" but with no specifics. >Don't be surprised that somebody points you to a Faust tutorial. > >>Anyway - thanks... > >Eric JacobsenHi Eric, Well done! [-Rick-]
Question regarding Faust for DSP
Started by ●July 26, 2014
Reply by ●July 28, 20142014-07-28
Reply by ●July 29, 20142014-07-29
Tim Wescott wrote:> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:18:42 -0700, Mauritz Jameson wrote: > >> [ *SNIP* ] > > I really think that if you need to stick with Faust (which you have said > you don't), that this is not the right group for it. If someone here was > facile with finding filters in Faust, they would have come forward. The > resounding silence on the Faustian aspects of your question is telling me > that it's not a tool you should use with any expectation of getting help > -- and it's not like the regulars here aren't good with DSP-related > design. >I wonder why he hasn't asked on the Faust mailing list? http://faust.grame.fr/index.php/support/mailing-lists/faudiostream-users
Reply by ●July 29, 20142014-07-29
Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.please> writes:> [...] > If someone here was facile with finding filters in Faust, ...That's the funniest thing I've read here all year! LOL! -- Randy Yates Digital Signal Labs http://www.digitalsignallabs.com
Reply by ●July 29, 20142014-07-29
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:21:52 -0400, Randy Yates wrote:> Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.please> writes: >> [...] >> If someone here was facile with finding filters in Faust, ... > > That's the funniest thing I've read here all year! LOL!I tend to fall into alliteration if I'm presented with a statement that has a little bit of it. "p", "t" and "f" are the worst letters for me, and bring out an almost compulsive urge to make the longest tongue- twister I can compose. I'm glad someone noticed: "filters in Faust" was the starting point, then I just HAD to go on a search for more words that fit. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●July 30, 20142014-07-30
On 07/30/2014 02:42 AM, Tim Wescott wrote:> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:21:52 -0400, Randy Yates wrote: > >> Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.please> writes: >>> [...] >>> If someone here was facile with finding filters in Faust, ... >> >> That's the funniest thing I've read here all year! LOL! > > I tend to fall into alliteration if I'm presented with a statement that > has a little bit of it. "p", "t" and "f" are the worst letters for me, > and bring out an almost compulsive urge to make the longest tongue- > twister I can compose. > > I'm glad someone noticed: "filters in Faust" was the starting point, then > I just HAD to go on a search for more words that fit."filters in Faust" was the easy part, but the devil is in the details. Steve
Reply by ●July 30, 20142014-07-30
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:41:40 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:> On 07/30/2014 02:42 AM, Tim Wescott wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:21:52 -0400, Randy Yates wrote: >> >>> Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.please> writes: >>>> [...] >>>> If someone here was facile with finding filters in Faust, ... >>> >>> That's the funniest thing I've read here all year! LOL! >> >> I tend to fall into alliteration if I'm presented with a statement that >> has a little bit of it. "p", "t" and "f" are the worst letters for me, >> and bring out an almost compulsive urge to make the longest tongue- >> twister I can compose. >> >> I'm glad someone noticed: "filters in Faust" was the starting point, >> then I just HAD to go on a search for more words that fit. > > "filters in Faust" was the easy part, but the devil is in the details.Yes, the damned detail devil does drive drivel, doesn't he? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●July 31, 20142014-07-31
On 07/31/2014 12:31 AM, Tim Wescott wrote:> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:41:40 +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: > >> On 07/30/2014 02:42 AM, Tim Wescott wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:21:52 -0400, Randy Yates wrote: >>> >>>> Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.please> writes: >>>>> [...] >>>>> If someone here was facile with finding filters in Faust, ... >>>> >>>> That's the funniest thing I've read here all year! LOL! >>> >>> I tend to fall into alliteration if I'm presented with a statement that >>> has a little bit of it. "p", "t" and "f" are the worst letters for me, >>> and bring out an almost compulsive urge to make the longest tongue- >>> twister I can compose. >>> >>> I'm glad someone noticed: "filters in Faust" was the starting point, >>> then I just HAD to go on a search for more words that fit. >> >> "filters in Faust" was the easy part, but the devil is in the details. > > Yes, the damned detail devil does drive drivel, doesn't he?Was your deal four and twenty anni of awful alliterations, anteceding an awful <insert something meaning eternity, beginning with A>? Steve
